Medical Law Review

Publisher: Oxford University Press
Founded in: 1997
Homepage: https://academic.oup.com/medla...
Rank:
• Rank 63/151 in Law (Web of Science 2017)
Category: Law

Authors per paper:
     Average: 1
     Median: 1
References per paper:
     Average:
     Median:

• Challenging the ‘Born Alive’ Threshold: Fetal Surgery, Artificial Wombs, and the English Approach to Legal Personhood
Medical Law Review 2019-06-03

• Ian Freckelton, Scholarly Misconduct: Law, Regulation and Practice
Medical Law Review 2019-05-06

• Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Disclosure of Health Data
Medical Law Review 2019-04-26

• The Discriminatory Legal Barrier of Partner Consent in Victorian ART Law: EHT18 v Melbourne IVF
Medical Law Review 2019-04-21

• Adolescents and Body Modification for Gender Identity Expression
Medical Law Review 2019-04-20

• Did Bioethics Matter? A History of Autonomy, Consent, and Intersex Genital Surgery
Medical Law Review 2019-04-20

• The Abolition or Reform of Mental Health Law: How Should the Law Recognise and Respond to the Vulnerability of Persons with Mental Impairment?
Medical Law Review 2019-04-13

• Regulating Child Sex Robots: Restriction or Experimentation?
Medical Law Review 2019-04-02

• Who Should We Blame for Healthcare Failings? Lessons from the French Tainted Blood Scandal
Medical Law Review 2019-03-06

• Competing Professional Knowledge Claims About Mental Capacity in the Court of Protection
Medical Law Review 2019-02-12

• Hii Chii Kok v (1) Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien; (2) National Cancer Centre: Modifying Montgomery
Medical Law Review 2019-01-29

• What is the Responsibility of Australian Medical Professionals Whose Patients Travel Abroad for Assisted Reproduction?
Medical Law Review 2019-01-28

• Walking the line: Balancing access to research and protecting prisoners
Medical Law Review 2019-01-21

• An NHS Trust and others v Y and another [2018] UKSC 46: Reducing the Role of the Courts in Treatment Withdrawal
Medical Law Review 2019-01-16

• The Impatient Patient and the Unreceptive Receptionist: Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50
Medical Law Review 2018-12-28

• Parental Rights, Best Interests And Significant Harms: Who Should Have The Final Say Over A Child's Medical Care?
Cambridge Law Journal 2019-04-22

• When the judge met P: the rules of engagement in the Court of Protection and the parallel universe of children meeting judges in the Family Court
Legal Studies 2019-03-27

• What’s Law got to do with Good Science?
Social & Legal Studies 2019-03-14

• When a Single Man Wants to Be a Father: Revealing the Invisible Subjects in the Law Regulating Fertility Treatment
Social & Legal Studies 2019-02-20

• Jesus is in Favor: Catholicism and Assisted Reproduction in Italy
Medical Anthropology 2019-02-06

Cited publication years:

Cited median publication year:
2015