Medical Law Review

Papers
(The median citation count of Medical Law Review is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Safeguarding Vulnerable Autonomy? Situational Vulnerability, the Inherent Jurisdiction, and Insights from Feminist Philosophy7
Monitoring Female Fertility Through ‘Femtech’: The Need for a Whole-System Approach to Regulation6
Mental capacity—why look for a paradigm shift?5
Legal Determinants of Health4
Parsing human rights, promoting health equity: reflections on Colombia’s response to Venezuelan migration4
The legal determinants of health (in)justice3
RELATIONSHIPS, RIGHTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES: (RE)VIEWING THE NHS CONSTITUTION FOR THE POST-PANDEMIC ‘NEW NORMAL’3
DNACPR Decisions: Aligning Law, Guidance, and Practice2
Responsible Practice or Restricted Practice? an Empirical Study of the Use of Clinical Guidelines in Medical Negligence Litigation2
ON GESTATION AND MOTHERHOOD2
WHERE DOES RESPONSIBILITY LIE? ANALYSING LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESPONSES TO FLAWED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS WHEN PATIENTS SUFFER HARM2
The Health and Care Act 2022: inserting telemedicine into the Abortion Act 19672
The publication of impaired doctors’ identity by Australian and New Zealand tribunals: law, practice, and reform2
The Warnock report and partial ectogestation: retracing the past to step into the future2
Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?2
Is there a New Duty to Warn Family Members in English Medical Law? ABC V ST George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and Others [2020] EWHC 4552
The Challenge of Bioinequality: Addressing the Health Impact of Unequal Treatment Through Law1
THE REQUIREMENT FOR TRANS AND GENDER DIVERSE YOUTH TO SEEK COURT APPROVAL FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF HORMONE TREATMENT: A COMPARISON OF AUSTRALIAN JURISPRUDENCE WITH THE ENGLISH DECISION IN BELL1
Looking back to look forward—the history of VAD laws in Australia and future law reform in the Australian territories1
When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data pro1
Dutifully Defying Death: A Right to Life-saving Emergency Treatment1
Judicial Discomfort over ‘Innovative’ Treatment for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria1
Plaintiff aims in medical negligence disputes: limitations of an adversarial system1
The role of non-genetic parents in a surrogate-born child’s identity: an argument for removal of the genetic link requirement1
Inequality by design: The politics behind forced migrants’ access to healthcare1
Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework1
Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?1
Vaccination as an Equaliser? Evaluating COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritisation and Compensation1
The social determinants of health, law, and urban development: using human rights to address structural health inequalities in our cities1
‘THIS IS NO COUNTRY FOR OLD (WO)MEN’? AN EXAMINATION OF THE APPROACH TAKEN TO CARE HOME RESIDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC1
Lucy Series, Deprivation of Liberty in the Shadows of the Institution1
The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights1
Charles Byrne, Last Victim of the Bodysnatchers: the Legal Case for Burial1
Jo Samanta and Ash Samanta (eds), Clinical Guidelines and the Law of Medical Negligence—Multidisciplinary and International Perspectives0
Books Received0
Bo Chen, Mental Health Law in China: A Socio-Legal Analysis, Routledge, 2022, Hardback/ebook, 176 pp, £120/£33.29, ISBN 97810320790660
Healthcare Services for Asylum-Seekers: Untangling the European Social Charter0
Anna Nilsson, Compulsory Mental Health Interventions and the CRPD: Minding Equality0
Jennings v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2022] EWHC 1619 (Fam): confirming the paradigm of inferred consent for posthumous conception0
Jeremy Hunt, Zero: Eliminating Unnecessary Deaths in a Post-pandemic NHS0
Jonathan Herring, The Right to Be Protected from Committing Suicide0
Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022): consequences one year on0
Books Received0
Editorial0
SELF-ADMINISTRATION OR PRACTITIONER ADMINISTRATION? THE SCOPE OF FUTURE GERMAN ASSISTED DYING LEGISLATION0
Bangladesh’s Mental Health Act 2018: A Critical Analysis0
Legal horizons and new challenges0
London Borough of Islington v EF [2022] EWHC 803 (FAM): falling through the great safety net of the inherent jurisdiction0
Swati Jha and Eloise Power (eds), Lessons from Medicolegal Cases in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Improving Clinical Practice0
Books Received0
Is the Unequal Treatment of Maternal and Paternal Liability Under the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976 Justified?0
HIV Disclosure—Professional Body Guidelines, the Law and the Boundaries of Medical Advice0
Fixed Buffer Zone Legislation: A Proportionate Response to Demonstrations Outside Abortion Clinics in England and Wales?0
Case Comment—JJ v Spectrum Community Health: When Medical Paternalism Meets Prisoners’ Dignity0
Camilla Pickles and Jonathan Herring (eds), Women’s Birthing Bodies: Unauthorised Intimate Examinations, Power and Vulnerability0
Xavier Symons, Why Conscience Matters: A Defence of Conscientious Objection in Healthcare0
Margaret Brazier, Law and Healing: A History of a Stormy Marriage0
An Emerging Pattern? A Further Case of Anticipated Capacity Loss in Pregnancy: North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust V SR [2021] EWCOP 580
Jordan A Parsons and Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Early Medical Abortion, Equality of Access, and the Telemedical Imperative0
The role of the right to life in respect of deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context0
Mary Donnelly, Rosie Harding and Ezgi Taşcıoğlu, Supporting Legal Capacity in Socio-Legal Context0
Jaime Lindsey, Reimagining the Court of Protection: Access to Justice in Mental Capacity Law0
Sally Sheldon, Gayle Davis, Jane O’Neill and Clare Parker, The Abortion Act 1967: A Biography of a UK Law0
The Scope of a Doctor’s Duty of Care to Their Patient0
B v University of Aberdeen [2020] CSIH 62: Where there’s a will, there’s a way0
Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v MSP [2020] EWCOP 26: The Need for Caution When Establishing the Wishes of Incapacitated Patients0
Puzzles of the Liminal Dead: St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Casey0
Friso Johannes Jansen, Professional Regulation and Medical Guidelines: The Real Forces Behind the Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines0
Books Received0
Record linkage of routine and cohort data of children in Portugal: challenges and opportunities when using record linkage as a tool for scientific research0
Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn (eds), Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis0
R (Gardner and Harris) v Secretary of State for Health and Social care and Others [2022] EWHC 967: Scant regard for Covid-19 risk to care homes0
Books Received0
Govert den Hartogh, What Kind of Death: The Ethics of Determining One’s Own Death0
Robert Klitzman, Designing Babies: How Technology Is Changing the Ways We Create Children0
Carolyn Adams, Judy Allen, and Felicity Flack, Sharing Linked Data for Health Research: Toward Better Decision Making0
Books Received0
Jonathan Herring, Law and the Relational Self0
Sue Westwood, Regulating the End of Life—Death Rights0
Daniel Wei Liang Wang, ‘Health Technology Assessment, Courts and the Right to Healthcare’0
A NHS Foundation Trust v MC [2020] EWCOP 33: Revisiting Best Interests and ‘Altruistic’ Incapacitous Stem Cell Donation0
A fine balance: Best interests in the context of invasive treatment and autism: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v William Verden [2022] EWCOP 90
How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement0
Heritable human genome editing: correction, selection and treatment0
Books Received0
Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights0
Terminating abortion demonstrations0
Parental orders for deceased intended parents: Re X (Foreign Surrogacy: Death of Intended Parent) [2022] EWFC 340
David Orentlicher and Tamara K.Hervey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Health Law0
Confirmation of the High Court’s Power to Override a Child’s Treatment Decision: A NHS Trust v X (In the matter of X (A Child) (No 2)) [2021] EWHC 65 (Fam)0
0.076694965362549