Medical Law Review

Papers
(The TQCC of Medical Law Review is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Safeguarding Vulnerable Autonomy? Situational Vulnerability, the Inherent Jurisdiction, and Insights from Feminist Philosophy10
Monitoring Female Fertility Through ‘Femtech’: The Need for a Whole-System Approach to Regulation7
Mental capacity—why look for a paradigm shift?5
RELATIONSHIPS, RIGHTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES: (RE)VIEWING THE NHS CONSTITUTION FOR THE POST-PANDEMIC ‘NEW NORMAL’5
Legal Determinants of Health5
Is there a New Duty to Warn Family Members in English Medical Law? ABC V ST George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and Others [2020] EWHC 4554
ON GESTATION AND MOTHERHOOD4
The legal determinants of health (in)justice4
Parsing human rights, promoting health equity: reflections on Colombia’s response to Venezuelan migration4
The Warnock report and partial ectogestation: retracing the past to step into the future3
Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?3
Judicial Discomfort over ‘Innovative’ Treatment for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria3
Plaintiff aims in medical negligence disputes: limitations of an adversarial system3
The Challenge of Bioinequality: Addressing the Health Impact of Unequal Treatment Through Law2
Inequality by design: The politics behind forced migrants’ access to healthcare2
DNACPR Decisions: Aligning Law, Guidance, and Practice2
The Health and Care Act 2022: inserting telemedicine into the Abortion Act 19672
Lucy Series, Deprivation of Liberty in the Shadows of the Institution2
The social determinants of health, law, and urban development: using human rights to address structural health inequalities in our cities2
Responsible Practice or Restricted Practice? an Empirical Study of the Use of Clinical Guidelines in Medical Negligence Litigation2
The publication of impaired doctors’ identity by Australian and New Zealand tribunals: law, practice, and reform2
WHERE DOES RESPONSIBILITY LIE? ANALYSING LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESPONSES TO FLAWED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS WHEN PATIENTS SUFFER HARM2
Vaccination as an Equaliser? Evaluating COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritisation and Compensation1
‘THIS IS NO COUNTRY FOR OLD (WO)MEN’? AN EXAMINATION OF THE APPROACH TAKEN TO CARE HOME RESIDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC1
Dutifully Defying Death: A Right to Life-saving Emergency Treatment1
Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?1
THE REQUIREMENT FOR TRANS AND GENDER DIVERSE YOUTH TO SEEK COURT APPROVAL FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF HORMONE TREATMENT: A COMPARISON OF AUSTRALIAN JURISPRUDENCE WITH THE ENGLISH DECISION IN BELL1
When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data pro1
The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights1
Charles Byrne, Last Victim of the Bodysnatchers: the Legal Case for Burial1
Looking back to look forward—the history of VAD laws in Australia and future law reform in the Australian territories1
Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework1
0.027309894561768