Earthquake Spectra

Papers
(The TQCC of Earthquake Spectra is 9. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
City‐scale buildings damage estimation based on broadband physics‐based ground motion simulation of 2021 M s 6.4 Yangbi, China, earthquake141
Modeling future economic costs and interdependent industry recovery after earthquakes125
Damped rigid substructure system for seismic protection of structures86
Shear wave velocity and site period measurements for the western portion of the Mexico City Basin following the Mw7.1 2017 Puebla–Morelos, Mexico, earthquake81
An algorithm for spectrally matching bi‐directional ground motions to a target RotD100 spectrum while maintaining the radial spectral acceleration pattern77
Front Matter66
An algorithm to calibrate analytical models of multi‐story buildings from vibration records61
Site characterization at Treasure Island and Delaney Park downhole arrays by heterogeneous data assimilation60
ReddyElizabeth. ¡Alerta!: Engineering on Shaky Ground. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2023, xii + 214 pp., $40.00 (soft‐cover, digital version available open access). ISBN: 978‐0‐262‐54551‐8.54
Front Matter42
From information to public preparedness in the Cascadia Subduction Zone: Examining risk communication outcomes in Metropolitan Portland, OR40
Shake table testing of a full‐scale three‐story seismically resilient steel‐framed building with reconfigurable lateral force‐resisting systems38
Damage in Rio Dell From 2022 Ferndale M6.4 Earthquake37
Data set from quasi‐static cyclic tests of scoured 2 × 3 pile‐group foundations for bridge structures34
Host‐region parameters for an adjustable model for crustal earthquakes to facilitate the implementation of the backbone approach to building ground‐motion logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard a33
Empirical ground‐motion basin response in the California Great Valley, Reno, Nevada, and Portland, Oregon31
Characterizing uncertainty of general building stock exposure data31
Seismic fragility assessment of reinforced concrete wall buildings in Colombia: Insights and implications for earthquake‐resistant design30
Assessment of urban seismic resilience of a town in Eastern Turkiye: Turkoglu, Kahramanmaras before and after 6 February 2023 M 7.8 Kahramanmaras earthquake30
National‐scale Mapping of the Expected Earthquake Magnitude for Soil Liquefaction Triggering Analyses in Italy29
Characteristics of effective California earthquake scenarios27
Probabilistic approach for seismic microzonation integrating 3D geological and geotechnical uncertainty27
Data‐Driven Insights Into Post‐Earthquake Reconnaissance Findings: 2023 Türkiye Earthquake Sequence26
An updated strong‐motion database of Türkiye (SMD‐TR)25
Seismic performance and damage assessment of bridges during the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Türkiye earthquakes ( M w = 7.8, M 24
National liquefaction loss database and event‐level fragility functions24
Geotechnical reconnaissance of an extensive cover‐collapse sinkhole phenomena of 2020–2021 Petrinja earthquake sequence (Central Croatia)24
An equivalent point‐source stochastic model of the NGA‐East ground‐motion models24
WITHDRAWAL – Administrative Duplicate Publication: Vs‐0 Correction Factors for Input Ground Motions used in Seismic Site Response Analyses24
Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulation validation of small-magnitude subduction earthquakes in New Zealand23
Damping capability enhancement of the polyurethane seismic isolation device for HV post insulators and its numerical evaluation with the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye Earthquake Sequence23
A closer look at hazard‐consistent ground motion record selection for building‐specific risk assessment: Effect of soil characteristics and accelerograms’ scaling23
Spectral matching RotD100: Effects on bidirectional lateral demand of reinforced concrete frame buildings23
Motivators and impediments to seismic retrofit implementation for wood‐frame soft‐story buildings: A case study in California22
A database of ground motion recordings, site profiles, and amplification factors from the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands22
Performance of water systems during the February 6th Kahramanmaras earthquakes21
Effect of soft sediments modeling on the seismic response of a 3D mid‐rise RC building: high‐resolution physics‐based ground‐motion simulations and empirical factors21
Predicting Seismic Debris Distributions of Collapsed Unreinforced Masonry Structures Through Physics Engines and Machine Learning Algorithms20
Methodology for determination of seismic force modification factors in Canada: Performance‐based unified procedure20
Database and Geometrical Characterization of 3D Stone Masonry Wall Microstructures20
Tsunami hazard evaluation of river embankment structures incorporating their vulnerability to seismic strong motion20
Performance evaluation of the USGS velocity model for the San Francisco Bay Area20
A model for partially dependent component damage fragilities in seismic risk analysis20
19
Probabilistic seismic damage and loss assessment methodology for wastewater network incorporating modeling uncertainty and damage correlations19
Analytical seismic fragility and vulnerability curves for Colombian informal unreinforced masonry buildings19
Erratum19
An improved ground motion model considering the seismological characteristics of the Korean Peninsula18
Quantifying the potential benefits of risk‐mitigation strategies on present and future seismic losses in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal18
Spectral scaling method using transfer functions for site-specific ground motion simulations18
Next‐Generation Probabilistic Liquefaction Model Building at the Regional Scale17
Experimental Evaluation of Prototype Seismic Retrofits for Precast Concrete Hollow‐Core Floors17
An equivalent damping ratio that accounts for ground‐motion spectral shape for displacement‐based design of flag‐shaped hysteresis systems17
An analytical model for 2D seismic tunnel‐aboveground structure interaction with considering the influence of tunnel longitudinal shear deformation16
Liquefaction‐induced ground and building interactions in İskenderun from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence16
Optimized derivation of hazard-consistent seismic fragility curves using Bayesian approach and multiple stripe analysis16
Peculiar characteristics of ground motions in Southern Italy: Insights from global and regional ground motion models16
Priority analysis framework for equitable seismic and energy‐efficiency renovation of residential buildings applied to mainland Portugal16
Seismic performance assessment of medical equipment using experimentally validated rolling and toppling nonlinear models16
Empirical ground‐motion models for horizontal Fourier amplitude spectra from fixed‐effects and mixed‐effects analyses of the NGA‐West2 database16
Suitability of Ground‐Motion Models for Seismic Hazard Assessments in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands16
Data‐driven seismic response prediction of structural components16
Site‐specific adjustment framework for incremental dynamic analysis (SAF‐IDA)16
Machine learning–based ground motion models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions16
Seismic loss assessment of existing hotel building in Ecuador16
Comprehensive numerical analyses of the seismic performance of natural gas pipelines crossing earthquake faults15
Rethinking resilience policy and practice15
15
Steven LKramer, Jonathan PStewart. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2025, 1060 pp., 140.00 (USD). ISBN: 978‐1‐03284‐274‐5 (hbk).15
Corrigendum15
Ground failures and foundation performances in Adıyaman–Gölbaşı following the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş–Türkiye Earthquake Sequence15
Parametric study on the collapse probability of modern reinforced concrete frames with infills15
Identifying viable financing mechanisms for post‐earthquake housing reconstruction in Canada: Case study of a M7 earthquake in British Columbia15
Semiempirical model for the estimation of site amplification in Northern South America15
Predicting the seismic ground‐motion parameters: 3D physics‐based numerical simulations combined with artificial neural networks15
Ground‐Motion Characterization for the 2025 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands14
Effects of source, path, and site conditions on damping modification factor for the horizontal response spectrum using offshore ground motions in the Japan Trench area14
The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground‐motion characterization for the conterminous United States14
Assessment of the prediction of ground motion parameters in 1D ground response analysis using data from seismic arrays and centrifuge experiments14
Seismic capacity models for earth dams and their use in developing fragility curves14
2021 US National Seismic Hazard Model for the State of Hawaii14
Seismic performance of UHV composite post electrical equipment interconnected using a rigid bus with a sliding fitting14
Erratum to “Conditional probability of surface rupture: a numerical approach for principal faulting”13
Conditional probability of surface rupture: A numerical approach for principal faulting13
From Warnings to Actions: Factors Influencing Response to Earthquake Early Warning—A Systematic Literature Review13
Seismic fragility functions for a pervasive unique form of construction with very high potential for social losses in Trinidad and Tobago: Two‐story houses13
Evaluation of directionality in physics‐based ground motion simulations of strike‐slip earthquakes13
V-FAST: A story-based vulnerability and fragility assessment toolkit for advancing PBEE13
Component Models for Steel Beam‐Columns With Hollow Structural Sections to Support the Practical Seismic Assessment of New and Existing Buildings13
A simplified replacement cost model for residential buildings located in developing countries: The case study of Colombia12
A latent Gaussian process model for the spatial distribution of liquefaction manifestation12
Validating V S 30 ‐Based Site Amplification Facto12
Seismic performance assessment of structural systems in the aftermath of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: Observations and fragility analyses12
A rupture directivity adjustment model and its application in seismic hazard12
Seismic loss comparison for buildings designed with ductile steel seismic force‐resisting systems and with controlled rocking braced frames12
Simulated site amplification for Central and Eastern North America: Data set development and amplification models12
Adjustment for the Gulf Coast and Atlantic Coastal Plain Region Considering Path Terms and Site Terms With Respect to Rupture Distance and Sediment Thickness for the Median NGA‐East Ground‐Motion Char12
Deep‐neural‐network model for predicting ground motion parameters using earthquake horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratios12
Three‐dimensional 0–10 Hz physics‐based simulations of the 2020 Magna, Utah, earthquake sequence11
11
Comparing subduction ground‐motion models to observations for Cascadia11
A numerical study on the seismic retrofit of Haitian reinforced concrete building frames11
A framework for the rapid assessment of seismic upgrade viability using performance‐based earthquake engineering11
Earthquake‐induced building damage recognition from unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing using scale‐invariant feature transform characteristics and support vector machine classification11
Discussion of “ASCE/SEI 41 assessment of reinforced concrete buildings: Benchmarking nonlinear dynamic procedures with empirical damage observations”11
11
Effective Seismic Retrofit of URM Parapets Using Mechanical Anchors as Vertical Reinforcement11
Updating proxy‐based site amplification map with in‐situ data in Osaka, Japan: A Bayesian scheme based on uncertainty projected mapping10
A refined simulation method of building earthquake evacuation processes considering multi‐exits and time‐variant velocities10
Vertical‐Component Seismic Response and System Identification of a 52‐Story High‐Rise Building Using Earthquake Data10
A building imagery database for the calibration of machine learning algorithms10
Bayesian parameter estimation of duration‐based variables used in post‐earthquake building recovery modeling10
Fragility modeling practices and their implications on risk and resilience analysis: From the structure to the network scale10
Empirical Ground‐Motion Model With Spatially Varying Coefficients for Improved Ground‐Motion Prediction Accuracy at Seismic Observation Stations in Japan10
Soil–structure interaction effects estimated with recursive subspace estimation methods10
Lessons in business recovery following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence, Türkiye informed by women entrepreneurs10
WITHDRAWAL – Administrative Duplicate Publication: Statistical Analysis of Japan Wood Frame Building Earthquake Debris Extent and Its Use in Road Networks in Japan10
Regional seismic velocity model for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains based on measured shear wave velocity, sediment thickness, and surface geology10
Front Matter10
“We ran outside and waited for it to come”: Resident experiences in response to a false earthquake early warning10
Damage to monumental masonry buildings in Hatay and Osmaniye following the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence: The role of wall geometry, construction quality, and material properties10
Scaling, Matching, and Variability: Effects of Time Series Selection in Performance of Code‐Compliant Bridges10
Predictive kappa ( κ ) models for Turkey: Regional effects and uncertainty analysis10
Use of scenario earthquakes for seismic hazard assessment in low‐seismicity, stable continental regions: A case study from Indiana, USA9
Directionality of FIV3 ground‐motion intensities during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquake doublet9
An open‐access simulated earthquake ground‐motion database for an M7 Hayward Fault earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Region9
Investment planning for earthquake‐resilient electric power systems considering cascading outages9
Field characterization of areas in İskenderun affected by liquefaction during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake9
Sharing data and code facilitates reproducible and impactful research9
Effects of probability model misspecification on the number of ground motions required for seismic performance assessment9
Variability and uncertainty of variance components in fixed‐effects and mixed‐effects ground‐motion models9
Effect of bidirectional excitation on seismic performance of regular RC frame buildings designed for modern codes9
9
Generation of numerical‐based capacity fragility curves for different aspect ratios of full‐connection gypsum partition walls9
Multi‐criteria decision‐making approach for optimal seismic/energy retrofitting of existing buildings9
High‐resolution post‐earthquake recovery simulation: Impact of safety cordons9
CORRIGENDUM TO “Ranking and developing ground‐motion models for Southeastern Africa”9
Seismic risk assessment and mitigation analysis of large public school building portfolios in Metro Manila9
Horizontal ground‐motion model for subduction slab earthquakes using offshore ground motions in the Japan Trench area9
Deep neural network–powered ground‐motion models for acceleration spectrum intensity, Housner’s spectrum intensity, and displacement spectrum intensity9
Agent-based simulation of the effectiveness of policies for the adoption of seismic retrofits9
Dead people aren’t resilient9
The Estimated Carbon Cost of Concrete Building Demolitions following the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence9
Seismic safety of informally constructed reinforced concrete houses in Puerto Rico9
Seismic fragility curves of a historical brick masonry minaret9
Evaluation of Earthquake‐Induced Slope Displacements in Greater Vancouver Based on Probabilistic Framework and Using NBCC 2020 and EqDisp Code Platform9
Factor Prioritization in FEMA P‐58 Loss Estimation9
Impact of parameter selection on seismic loss and recovery time estimates: A variance‐based sensitivity analysis9
Shake-table tests on two 40-ton reinforced concrete U-shaped walls with uniaxial and bidirectional-torsional response9
0.079739809036255