Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Papers
(The H4-Index of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science is 23. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Effects of Psychological Distance on Mental Abstraction: A Registered Report of Four Tests of Construal-Level Theory251
A Response to a Comment on Hall et al. (2024)164
A Tutorial on Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformal Prediction125
Adjusting for Publication Bias in JASP and R: Selection Models, PET-PEESE, and Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis101
Corrigendum: Impossible Hypotheses and Effect-Size Limits81
A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in Social-Science Research74
From the Illusion of Choice to Actual Control: Reconsidering the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance73
Beyond Statistical Myopia: Replying to a Misguided Critique of Mind–Body Research72
Language Models Accurately Infer Correlations Between Psychological Items and Scales From Text Alone71
Dissonance in the Induced-Compliance Paradigm: A Commentary on Vaidis et al. (2024)53
The Social-Relations Model for Asymmetric-Block-Design Data: A Tutorial With R48
Fast-Track Your Abstract Screening: Mastering ASReview for Accelerating Abstract Screening and Evaluating Decisions From Automatic-Screening Methods44
How Do Psychology Journals Handle Postpublication Critique? A Cross-Sectional Study of Policy and Practice39
An Inception-Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies Are Publicly Shared38
Noise Versus Signal: What Can One Conclude When a Classic Finding Fails to Replicate?34
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities30
Advancing Group-Based Disparities Research and Beyond: A Cautionary Note on Selection Bias28
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions27
Reproducibility of Published Meta-Analyses on Clinical-Psychological Interventions27
Can Results-Blind Selection Improve Science Communication?27
One Decade Into the Replication Crisis, How Have Psychological Results Changed?27
Performing Small-Telescopes Analysis by Resampling: Empirically Constructing Confidence Intervals and Estimating Statistical Power for Measures of Effect Size25
Beyond the Mean: Can We Improve the Predictive Power of Psychometric Scales?25
Implementing Statcheck During Peer Review Is Related to a Steep Decline in Statistical-Reporting Inconsistencies23
Evaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertation23
0.24953007698059