Journal of Responsible Innovation

Papers
(The median citation count of Journal of Responsible Innovation is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation88
Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices55
Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsible research and innovation47
Learning to do responsible innovation in industry: six lessons37
Joint declaration on mainstreaming RRI across Horizon Europe35
Embedding responsible innovation within synthetic biology research and innovation: insights from a UK multi-disciplinary research centre35
From Responsible Research and Innovation to responsibility by design33
The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design30
Exploring the readiness of publicly funded researchers to practice responsible research and innovation in digital agriculture29
RRI legacies: co-creation for responsible, equitable and fair innovation in Horizon Europe28
Inclusion in responsible innovation: revisiting the desirability of opening up24
Politicising Circular Economy: what can we learn from Responsible Innovation?23
Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges22
Reconceptualising responsible research and innovation from a Global South perspective22
Toward anticipatory governance of human genome editing: a critical review of scholarly governance discourse21
What’s wrong with global challenges?19
Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers19
Fitting the description: historical and sociotechnical elements of facial recognition and anti-black surveillance19
Emotions, values and technology: illuminating the blind spots19
In pursuit of responsible innovation for precision agriculture technologies17
The responsible innovation in health tool and the need to reconcile formative and summative ends in RRI tools for business17
Indigenous-led responsible innovation: lessons from co-developed protocols to guide the use of drones to monitor a biocultural landscape in Kakadu National Park, Australia16
COVID-19 and the onlineification of research: kick-starting a dialogue on Responsible online Research and Innovation (RoRI)16
Challenges in the implementation of responsible research and innovation across Horizon 202016
Responsible research, inequality in science and epistemic injustice: an attempt to open up thinking about inclusiveness in the context of RI/RRI16
Slow Innovation: the need for reflexivity in Responsible Innovation (RI)15
Social license and synthetic biology: the trouble with mining terms15
Advantages and disadvantages of societal engagement: a case study in a research and technology organization15
Managing budgetary uncertainty, interpreting policy. How researchers integrate “grand challenges” funding programs into their research agendas15
Imagining the future through revisiting the past: the value of history in thinking about R(R)I’s possible future(s)15
Collective improvisation as a means to responsibly govern serendipity in social innovation processes14
Vision as make-believe: how narratives and models represent sociotechnical futures14
Responsible research and innovation meets multispecies studies: why RRI needs to be a more-than-human exercise12
Multiple futures for society, research, and innovation in the European Union: jumping to 203812
The lottery in Babylon—On the role of chance in scientific success12
Co-creation in support of responsible research and innovation: an analysis of three stakeholder workshops on nanotechnology for health12
Two tribes or more? The historical emergence of discourse coalitions of responsible research and innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)12
When nature goes digital: routes for responsible innovation12
The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management: something for everyone11
Responsible innovation between virtue and governance: revisiting Arendt’s notion of work as action11
Responsible innovation in school design – a systematic review10
STS Postures: responsible innovation and research in undergraduate STEM education10
Taking knowledge production seriously in responsible research and innovation10
Why do newly industrialized economies deter to adopt responsible research and innovation?: the case of emerging technologies in Korea10
Value beyond scientific validity: let’s RULE (Reliability, Utility, LEgitimacy)9
Participatory design: lessons and directions for responsible research and innovation8
Organizational patterns of RRI: how organizational properties relate to RRI implementation8
A comparative, sociotechnical design perspective on Responsible Innovation: multidisciplinary research and education on digitized energy and Automated Vehicles8
Toward institutionalization of responsible innovation in the contemporary research university: insights from case studies of Arizona State University8
Design for values and the city8
Lotteries make science fairer7
An RRI for the present moment: relational and ‘well-up’ innovation7
Public engagement in contested political contexts: reflections on the role of recursive reflexivity in responsible innovation7
Rediscovering a risky ideology: technocracy and its effects on technology governance7
Responsible design and assessment of a SARS-CoV virtual reality rehabilitation programme: guidance ethics in context7
Narrative as a resource for inclusive governance: a UK–Brazil comparison of public responses to nanotechnology7
Science, technology, and life politics beyond the market6
Scientists’ views on (moral) luck6
Opening up, closing down, or leaving ajar? How applications are used in engaging with publics about gene drive6
RRI Futures: learning from a diversity of voices and visions6
Nanoscientists’ perceptions of serving as ethical leaders within their organization: Implications from ethical leadership for responsible innovation6
Luck as a challenge for the responsible governance of science and technology6
‘That would break the containment’: the co-production of responsibility and safety-by-design in xenobiology6
The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research5
Forgotten publics: considering disabled perspectives in responsible research and innovation5
Luck and the responsibilities to protect one’s epigenome5
On the scientist’s moral luck and wholeheartedness5
Experimentation, learning, and dialogue: an RRI-inspired approach to dual-use of concern5
Necessary conditions for responsible innovation5
Who gets to be born? The anticipatory governance of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis technology in the United Kingdom from 1978–20015
From Value Sensitive Design to values absorption – building an instrument to analyze organizational capabilities for value-sensitive innovation5
Two dogmas of peer-reviewism5
(Nation) building civic epistemologies around nuclear energy in India5
From a land ‘down under’: the potential role of responsible innovation as practice during the bottom-up development of mission arenas in Australia5
Responsible impact and the reinforcement of responsible innovation in the public sector ecosystem: cases of digital health innovation4
Innovation and equality: an approach to constructing a community governed network commons4
Looking beyond the ‘horizon’ of RRI: moving from discomforts to commitments as early career researchers4
If deliberation is the answer, what is the question? Objectives and evaluation of public participation and engagement in science and technology4
Trust, trustworthiness, and relationships: ontological reflections on public trust in science4
Stop re-inventing the wheel: or how ELSA and RRI can align4
Civic ethics as a normative framework for responsible research and innovation4
‘There is nothing nano-specific here’: a reconstruction of the different understandings of responsiveness in responsible nanotechnology innovation4
Cosmopolitan technology assessment? Lessons learned from attempts to address the deficit of technology assessment in Europe4
0.089518070220947