Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Who [did] what where, when, why, and how: My gist of fuzzy trace theory.112
Delivering more information to and from lineup witnesses: Commentary on Brewer and Doyle.35
Misinformation and the sins of memory: False-belief formation and limits on belief revision.33
Face identification in the laboratory and in virtual worlds.33
Visual decision aids: Improving laypeople’s understanding of forensic science evidence.29
Me, myself, and everyone else: Potential impacts of episodic processes on national and personal memories.24
People draw on the consequences of others’ negative experiences to make unwarranted appraisals about those experiences.22
The effect of face masks on forensic face matching: An individual differences study.21
Supplemental Material for Reading Aloud Improves Proofreading (but Using Sans Forgetica Font Does Not)19
Supplemental Material for Younger and Older Women, but Not Men, Are Implicitly Biased to Associate Honesty With Children18
A multiconceptual approach to forgetting prose-induced fixation in creative problem-solving.17
Future perspectives on the role of vantage point in memories.16
The dire need to examine relationships between prospection and subtypes of anxiety.15
Reflections on personal and collective time travel: Some additional findings and suggestions for future research.14
The ecology of youth psychological wellbeing in the COVID-19 pandemic.14
Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects?13
The brain and learning: New drives to integrate applied cognitive science in Australian education.13
Supplemental Material for Does Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assistance Mitigate Biased Evaluations of Eyewitness Identifications?12
Supplemental Material for Persistence of the Verbal Overshadowing and Weapon-Focus Effects on Lineup Identification Performance11
Implicit Blackstone ratios in decisions made by firearm and toolmark examiners.10
The experiences that define us: Autobiographical periods predict memory centrality to narrative identity.10
Supplemental Material for Repeated by Many Versus Repeated by One: Examining the Role of Social Consensus in the Relationship Between Repetition and Belief10
Supplemental Material for Diagnostic Information Produces Better-Calibrated Judgments About Forensic Comparison Evidence Than Likelihood Ratios10
Supplemental Material for Learning to Call Bullsh*t via Induction: Categorization Training Improves Critical Thinking Performance10
Not universally sinful: Cultural aspects of memory sins.9
Fair lineups improve outside observers’ discriminability, not eyewitnesses’ discriminability: Evidence for differential filler-siphoning using empirical data and the WITNESS computer-simulation archit9
Scholarship amid sheep: Applied cognition research in Aotearoa New Zealand.9
On the same wavelength: The impact of other-generated cues on the reported retrieval processes and qualities of autobiographical memories.9
The problem of a hammer: Eyewitness identification research relies on the wrong comparisons.8
Scenario-based messages on social media motivate COVID-19 information seeking.8
Misinformed about the “infodemic?” Science’s ongoing struggle with misinformation.8
Cartridge-case examiners’ aversion to true rejections: A shocking problem with use of the “inconclusive” category.8
A tale of two distrusts: Memory distrust toward commission and omission errors in the Chinese context.8
Piece-rate time-based incentives improve sustained attention.8
Acknowledgments7
Testing two attention-related effects in COVID-19 vaccine likelihood.7
Human or artificial intelligence: Can people tell the difference in first-person narratives?7
Some collaborations just are not worth it. Comment on Clark et al.7
Supplemental Material for Disclosing the Number of Simultaneous Lineups Increases Guessing-Based Selection in Cases of Multiple-Culprit Crimes7
Generative Chatbots ain’t experts: Exploring cognitive and metacognitive limitations that hinder expertise in generative Chatbots.7
Wires crossed? On Chatbots as threats to reality monitoring.7
When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events.7
How can retrieval practice improve educational achievement in Brazil?7
Improving self-regulated learning of less-prepared college students with lessons about inferences.7
Gremlins in childhood amnesia research.6
Supplemental Material for They Forgot Their “Baby”?!: Factors That Lead Students to Forget Their Cell Phone6
Performing up to par? Performance pressure increases undergraduates’ cognitive performance and effort.6
The effect of handedness on mental arithmetic: A longitudinal large-scale investigation through smart mobile devices.6
A simple intervention can improve estimates of sugar content.6
Supplemental Material for Adaptive Lie Detection and Perceived Prevalence of False Reports in Evaluation of Sexual Offense Allegations5
Supplemental Material for Practice With Feedback Versus Lecture: Consequences for Learning, Efficiency, and Motivation5
Supplemental Material for Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory: The Autobiographical Recollection Test Predicts Ratings of Specific Memories Across Cueing Conditions5
How does the type of expected evaluation impact students’ self-regulated learning?5
Face value? How jurors evaluate eyewitness face recognition ability.5
Fuzzy-trace theory and the battle for the gist in the public mind.5
Using artificial intelligence to assess eyewitness identification accuracy.5
Supplemental Material for Face Value? How Jurors Evaluate Eyewitness Face Recognition Ability5
If generalization is the grail, practical relevance is the nirvana: Considerations from the contribution of psychological science of memory to law.5
How considering adaptive functions of mental imagery perspective may offer new insight on memory accuracy.5
Memory for symbolic images: Findings from sports team logos.5
In my opinion you are wrong! Adding a model statement to the Devil’s Advocate Approach to detect true and false opinions.5
Correction to “cross-cultural differences in memory specificity: Investigation of candidate mechanisms” by Leger and Gutchess (2021).5
Supplemental Material for Shared Flashbulb Memories Lead to Identity Fusion: Recalling the Defeat in the Brexit Referendum Produces Strong Psychological Bonds Among Remain Supporters5
Supplemental Material for Hindsight Bias and COVID-19: Hindsight Was Not 20/20 in 20205
Future-thinking interventions in depression: Does behavior change? Does it need to? And how should we assess if it does?5
Academic researchers can help bust eyewitness myths and play a role in shaping policy in the criminal justice system.5
The impact of lecture fluency and technology fluency on students’ online learning and evaluations of instructors.5
On the educational relevance of immediate judgment of learning reactivity: No effects of predicting one’s memory for general knowledge facts.5
Adaptive practice quizzing in a university lecture: A pre-registered field experiment.4
Supplemental Material for Directed Forgetting in the Social Domain: Forgetting Behaviors But Not Inferred Traits4
Supplemental Material for Explaining and Reducing the Public’s Expectations of Antibiotics: A Utility-Based Signal Detection Theory Approach4
Supplemental Material for How Susceptible Are You? Using Feedback and Monitoring to Reduce the Influence of False Information4
Keep your enemies close: Adversarial collaborations will improve behavioral science.4
Understanding early learning in an evolving digital media landscape.4
Positive and negative vicarious memories in college students and adults.4
Supplemental Material for Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory Predict Memory Confidence but Not Memory Accuracy4
Use and misuse of receiver operating characteristic analysis in eyewitness identification.4
Cognitive and academic skills in two developmental cohorts of different ability level: A mutualistic network perspective.4
Clearing the obstacles to adversarial collaborations for early career researchers. Comment on Clark et al.4
Generalizations: The grail and the gremlins.4
Adversarial collaborations in behavioral science: Benefits and boundary conditions. Comment on Clark et al.4
The cultural career script: College students’ expectations for a typical career.4
Supplemental Material for Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups4
Exposure to headlines as questions reduces illusory truth for subsequent headlines.4
Attention contagion online: Attention spreads between students in a virtual classroom.4
Social endorsement influences the continued belief in corrected misinformation.4
Wordless wisdom: The dominant role of tacit knowledge in true and fake news discrimination.4
On keeping our adversaries close, preventing collateral damage, and changing our minds. Comment on Clark et al.4
Eyewitness identification speed: Slow identifications from highly confident eyewitnesses hurt perceptions of their testimony.4
Disclosing the number of simultaneous lineups increases guessing-based selection in cases of multiple-culprit crimes.3
Scripts, agents, and interpretations: Delving into the valence biases of mental time travel.3
Does artificial intelligence (AI) assistance mitigate biased evaluations of eyewitness identifications?3
Individual differences in autobiographical memory: The autobiographical recollection test predicts ratings of specific memories across cueing conditions.3
A stability bias effect among lie-tellers: Testing the “miscalibration” and “strategic” hypotheses.3
Things have changed but now they’ll stay the same: Generational differences and mental time travel for collective remembering of national historic events.3
The pretesting effect comes to full fruition after prolonged retention interval.3
Supplemental Material for When Did This Happen? Indicators of Accuracy for Dating Recent and Remote Personal Events3
Supplemental Material for Factors That Influence Deep/Shallow Lecture Notetaking: Japanese and Chinese Students’ Strategies in Math Class3
Lay understanding of vaccine efficacy.3
Turn-by-turn route guidance does not impair route learning.3
Cross-national replication of prosocial simulation effect using cumulative link mixed modelling.3
Attending less and forgetting more: Dynamics of simultaneous, massed, and spaced presentations in science concept learning.3
When fairness is flawed: Effects of false balance reporting and weight-of-evidence statements on beliefs and perceptions of climate change.3
Supplemental Material for Fair Lineups Improve Outside Observers’ Discriminability, Not Eyewitnesses’ Discriminability: Evidence for Differential Filler-Siphoning Using Empirical Data and the WITNESS 3
Sensitizing jurors to eyewitness confidence using “reason-based” judicial instructions.3
Photo-taking impairs memory on perceptual and conceptual memory tests.3
Adversarial collaborations will not solve society’s moral debates. Comment on Clark et al.3
Perceptions of task fluency mislead judgments of eyewitness identification accuracy.3
When study capacities are limited and deadline is fixed—How practice type and practice timing influence recall of practiced and unpracticed material.3
Den mørke side af semantisk kontekst [the dark side of semantic context]: Semantic context boosts people’s confidence in their ability to comprehend Danish.3
Maternal reminiscing style and children’s eyewitness testimony.3
0.086769104003906