Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Supplemental Material for Reading Aloud Improves Proofreading (but Using Sans Forgetica Font Does Not)39
People draw on the consequences of others’ negative experiences to make unwarranted appraisals about those experiences.38
Visual decision aids: Improving laypeople’s understanding of forensic science evidence.37
Me, myself, and everyone else: Potential impacts of episodic processes on national and personal memories.28
Fluency: A surprisingly overlooked area of scientific communication?22
Misinformation and the sins of memory: False-belief formation and limits on belief revision.19
The effect of face masks on forensic face matching: An individual differences study.18
Who [did] what where, when, why, and how: My gist of fuzzy trace theory.18
Supplemental Material for Younger and Older Women, but Not Men, Are Implicitly Biased to Associate Honesty With Children17
A multiconceptual approach to forgetting prose-induced fixation in creative problem-solving.16
Future perspectives on the role of vantage point in memories.15
Face identification in the laboratory and in virtual worlds.15
Supplemental Material for Promoting a Shift in Perspective in Argumentative Thinking: Metaphorical Framing for Orienting Attention15
Reflections on personal and collective time travel: Some additional findings and suggestions for future research.13
The dire need to examine relationships between prospection and subtypes of anxiety.11
Supplemental Material for Does Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assistance Mitigate Biased Evaluations of Eyewitness Identifications?11
The ecology of youth psychological wellbeing in the COVID-19 pandemic.11
Scenario-based messages on social media motivate COVID-19 information seeking.10
Implicit Blackstone ratios in decisions made by firearm and toolmark examiners.10
Supplemental Material for Positive Social Autobiographical Memory Recall Enhances Positive Affect, Self-Esteem, and Social Reward Seeking After Exclusion in Individuals With High Social Anxiety10
The brain and learning: New drives to integrate applied cognitive science in Australian education.10
The experiences that define us: Autobiographical periods predict memory centrality to narrative identity.10
Supplemental Material for Diagnostic Information Produces Better-Calibrated Judgments About Forensic Comparison Evidence Than Likelihood Ratios10
Scholarship amid sheep: Applied cognition research in Aotearoa New Zealand.9
On the same wavelength: The impact of other-generated cues on the reported retrieval processes and qualities of autobiographical memories.9
Supplemental Material for Learning to Call Bullsh*t via Induction: Categorization Training Improves Critical Thinking Performance9
Not universally sinful: Cultural aspects of memory sins.9
Supplemental Material for Persistence of the Verbal Overshadowing and Weapon-Focus Effects on Lineup Identification Performance9
Cartridge-case examiners’ aversion to true rejections: A shocking problem with use of the “inconclusive” category.9
Fair lineups improve outside observers’ discriminability, not eyewitnesses’ discriminability: Evidence for differential filler-siphoning using empirical data and the WITNESS computer-simulation archit9
A tale of two distrusts: Memory distrust toward commission and omission errors in the Chinese context.9
Testing two attention-related effects in COVID-19 vaccine likelihood.8
A simple intervention can improve estimates of sugar content.8
How can retrieval practice improve educational achievement in Brazil?8
Supplemental Material for Disclosing the Number of Simultaneous Lineups Increases Guessing-Based Selection in Cases of Multiple-Culprit Crimes8
Some collaborations just are not worth it. Comment on Clark et al.8
Acknowledgments8
Human or artificial intelligence: Can people tell the difference in first-person narratives?8
Wires crossed? On Chatbots as threats to reality monitoring.8
Piece-rate time-based incentives improve sustained attention.8
When did this happen? Indicators of accuracy for dating recent and remote personal events.8
Improving self-regulated learning of less-prepared college students with lessons about inferences.8
Generative Chatbots ain’t experts: Exploring cognitive and metacognitive limitations that hinder expertise in generative Chatbots.8
Supplemental Material for Repeated by Many Versus Repeated by One: Examining the Role of Social Consensus in the Relationship Between Repetition and Belief8
Supplemental Material for Adaptive Lie Detection and Perceived Prevalence of False Reports in Evaluation of Sexual Offense Allegations7
Using artificial intelligence to assess eyewitness identification accuracy.7
The effect of handedness on mental arithmetic: A longitudinal large-scale investigation through smart mobile devices.7
Misinformed about the “infodemic?” Science’s ongoing struggle with misinformation.7
Performing up to par? Performance pressure increases undergraduates’ cognitive performance and effort.7
Supplemental Material for In Subclinical Depression in Undergraduates, Odor-Evoked Autobiographical Memories Are Relatively Less Vivid Than Those Evoked With Words or Photographs7
Supplemental Material for Hindsight Bias and COVID-19: Hindsight Was Not 20/20 in 20207
Supplemental Material for Face Value? How Jurors Evaluate Eyewitness Face Recognition Ability7
Supplemental Material for They Forgot Their “Baby”?!: Factors That Lead Students to Forget Their Cell Phone7
Supplemental Material for Shared Flashbulb Memories Lead to Identity Fusion: Recalling the Defeat in the Brexit Referendum Produces Strong Psychological Bonds Among Remain Supporters7
Moral growth through cultural–moral disruption: Can wise metacognitive strategies teach wise moral tolerance?6
Supplemental Material for Practice With Feedback Versus Lecture: Consequences for Learning, Efficiency, and Motivation6
Wisdom at work: Cultivating perspectival metacognition for adaptive leadership.6
A photo-taking impairment effect on conceptual inference: The disruptive effect of taking photos on learning abstract categories.6
If generalization is the grail, practical relevance is the nirvana: Considerations from the contribution of psychological science of memory to law.6
Future-thinking interventions in depression: Does behavior change? Does it need to? And how should we assess if it does?6
Adversarial collaborations in behavioral science: Benefits and boundary conditions. Comment on Clark et al.5
How considering adaptive functions of mental imagery perspective may offer new insight on memory accuracy.5
How does the type of expected evaluation impact students’ self-regulated learning?5
Supplemental Material for How Susceptible Are You? Using Feedback and Monitoring to Reduce the Influence of False Information5
Gremlins in childhood amnesia research.5
The impact of lecture fluency and technology fluency on students’ online learning and evaluations of instructors.5
In my opinion you are wrong! Adding a model statement to the Devil’s Advocate Approach to detect true and false opinions.5
Generalizations: The grail and the gremlins.5
Fuzzy-trace theory and the battle for the gist in the public mind.5
Keep your enemies close: Adversarial collaborations will improve behavioral science.5
Academic researchers can help bust eyewitness myths and play a role in shaping policy in the criminal justice system.5
Memory for symbolic images: Findings from sports team logos.5
Correction to “cross-cultural differences in memory specificity: Investigation of candidate mechanisms” by Leger and Gutchess (2021).5
Wordless wisdom: The dominant role of tacit knowledge in true and fake news discrimination.5
On the educational relevance of immediate judgment of learning reactivity: No effects of predicting one’s memory for general knowledge facts.5
Face value? How jurors evaluate eyewitness face recognition ability.5
Attention contagion online: Attention spreads between students in a virtual classroom.4
Social endorsement influences the continued belief in corrected misinformation.4
Cognitive and academic skills in two developmental cohorts of different ability level: A mutualistic network perspective.4
Understanding early learning in an evolving digital media landscape.4
Attending less and forgetting more: Dynamics of simultaneous, massed, and spaced presentations in science concept learning.4
A dual process theory perspective on the role of radical uncertainty in decision making.4
Clearing the obstacles to adversarial collaborations for early career researchers. Comment on Clark et al.4
On keeping our adversaries close, preventing collateral damage, and changing our minds. Comment on Clark et al.4
Supplemental Material for Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups4
Positive and negative vicarious memories in college students and adults.4
Supplemental Material for Using ChatGPT-Generated Prequestions to Improve Memory and Text Comprehension4
Misinformation: Current directions and new insights.4
Supplemental Material for Directed Forgetting in the Social Domain: Forgetting Behaviors But Not Inferred Traits4
Supplemental Material for Explaining and Reducing the Public’s Expectations of Antibiotics: A Utility-Based Signal Detection Theory Approach4
The pretesting effect comes to full fruition after prolonged retention interval.4
The cultural career script: College students’ expectations for a typical career.4
Supplemental Material for Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory Predict Memory Confidence but Not Memory Accuracy4
A stability bias effect among lie-tellers: Testing the “miscalibration” and “strategic” hypotheses.3
Cross-national replication of prosocial simulation effect using cumulative link mixed modelling.3
Scripts, agents, and interpretations: Delving into the valence biases of mental time travel.3
Supplemental Material for Fair Lineups Improve Outside Observers’ Discriminability, Not Eyewitnesses’ Discriminability: Evidence for Differential Filler-Siphoning Using Empirical Data and the WITNESS 3
Things have changed but now they’ll stay the same: Generational differences and mental time travel for collective remembering of national historic events.3
Supplemental Material for When Did This Happen? Indicators of Accuracy for Dating Recent and Remote Personal Events3
Individual differences in autobiographical memory: The autobiographical recollection test predicts ratings of specific memories across cueing conditions.3
When study capacities are limited and deadline is fixed—How practice type and practice timing influence recall of practiced and unpracticed material.3
“Consistent with views of a climate skeptic”: Counterattitudinal alignment salience protects against illusory truth.3
Maternal reminiscing style and children’s eyewitness testimony.3
Exposure to headlines as questions reduces illusory truth for subsequent headlines.3
When fairness is flawed: Effects of false balance reporting and weight-of-evidence statements on beliefs and perceptions of climate change.3
Perceptions of task fluency mislead judgments of eyewitness identification accuracy.3
Does artificial intelligence (AI) assistance mitigate biased evaluations of eyewitness identifications?3
Den mørke side af semantisk kontekst [the dark side of semantic context]: Semantic context boosts people’s confidence in their ability to comprehend Danish.3
Adaptive practice quizzing in a university lecture: A pre-registered field experiment.3
0.080771923065186