Research & Politics

Papers
(The TQCC of Research & Politics is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-12-01 to 2025-12-01.)
ArticleCitations
Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining39
Corrigendum: Do TJ policies cause backlash? Evidence from street name changes in Spain32
The uses for fire data and satellite images in monitoring, detecting, and documenting collective political violence28
Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections27
Reevaluating ideological asymmetries in specific support for the Supreme Court25
Russian adventurism and Central Asian leaders’ foreign policy rhetoric: Evidence from the UN General Debate corpus21
Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the breakdown of mainstream parties19
New evidence reveals curvilinear relationship between levels of democracy and deforestation17
Public perceptions of local influence15
Vote-by-mail policy and the 2020 presidential election13
What explains election-driven family conflicts?13
Descriptive representation and attitudes about local government: An experimental test using real-world stimuli11
Stand up and be counted: Using traffic cameras to assess voting behavior in real time11
Rents, refugees, and the populist radical right10
Bureaucracy and policymaking: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis9
Legitimate questions: Public perceptions of the legitimacy of US presidential election outcomes9
Words that matter: A machine learning analysis of United Nations General Assembly speeches and their influence on aid allocation9
Does sports success increase government support? Voter (ir)rationality in a multiparty context8
The electoral consequences of policy-making in coalition governments8
Mind the context! The role of theoretical concepts for analyzing legislative text data8
The effects of partisan framing on COVID-19 attitudes: Experimental evidence from early and late pandemic8
New data, new results? How data sources and vintages affect the replicability of research8
Fundraising on the fringe: Do ideologically extreme candidates solicit small donations?8
Women’s descriptive representation and support for the inclusion of gender-related provisions in trade agreements7
The life, death and diversity of pro-government militias: The fully revised pro-government militias database version 2.07
Political shock and international students: Estimating the “Trump effect”7
Stability and change in the opinion–policy relationship: Evidence from minimum wage laws7
Shame, endorse, or remain silent?: State response to human rights violations in other countries7
Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States6
The unexpected results of the peace referendum changed conflict termination preferences in Colombia6
Does affective empathy capacity condition individual variation in support for military escalation? Evidence from a survey vignette6
Conspiratorial thinking in the Latino community on the 2020 election6
Political trust and public support for propaganda in China6
Do AIs know what the most important issue is? Using language models to code open-text social survey responses at scale6
What’s woke? Ordinary Americans’ understandings of wokeness6
What do Germans of Russian and Turkish migration background think about sanctions against Russia?6
Entitled and self-conscious? The ego-centric underpinnings of electoral preferences during the 2020 U.S. election6
Changing the lens: The contingency of results from conjoint experiments on the outcome variable and the estimand6
Economic shocks and militant formation5
Corrigendum to “An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support”5
Does polygyny cause intergroup conflict? Re-examining Koos and Neupert-Wentz (2020)5
Authoritarianism and support for Trump and Clinton in the 2016 primaries5
The effect of party identification and party cues on populist attitudes5
Gender stereotypes and petty corruption among street-level bureaucrats: Evidence from a conjoint experiment5
Using MI-LASSO to study populist radical right voting in times of pandemic4
Do political finance reforms really reduce corruption? A replication study4
Machine-learning applications to authoritarian selections: The case of China4
Armed conflict as a threat to social cohesion: Large-scale displacement and its short- and long-term effects on in-group perceptions4
Distributive politics as behavioral localism: Evidence from a vignette experiment in Hungary4
Feminism within parties: Implications for political elite evaluations and policy attitudes4
Are courts “different?” Experimental evidence on the unique costs of attacking courts4
Entering the “foxhole”: Partisan media priming and the application of racial justice in America4
Did you hear about Clarence Thomas? Measuring public attention toward the Supreme Court4
Unexpected, but consistent and pre-registered: Experimental evidence on interview language and Latino views of COVID-194
Detecting pro-kremlin disinformation using large language models4
From masks to mismanagement: A global assessment of the rise and fall of pandemic-related protests4
Why programmatic parties reduce criminal violence: Theory and evidence from Brazil4
Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science4
0.047153949737549