International Data Privacy Law

Papers
(The TQCC of International Data Privacy Law is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Intermediating data rights exercises: the role of legal mandates24
The conflict between China’s restrictions on cross-border data transfer and US discovery of evidence20
Theory and practice: the protection of children’s personal information in China10
Applying GDPR roles and responsibilities to scientific data sharing9
The constitutionality of the new Indian CERT-In VPN rules8
A cross-cultural analysis of transparency: the interplay of law, privacy policies, and user perceptions8
Reforming the Australian Framework for International Data Sharing7
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Data protection in the judiciary in EU and EEA Member States7
Some parting remarks, with a hopeful glance towards the future7
Complying with the GDPR when vulnerable people use smart devices7
Reflections on the murky legal practices of political micro-targeting from a GDPR perspective7
The Brussels effect(s) and the rise of a privacy profession6
Correction to: The conflict between China’s restrictions on cross-border data transfer and US discovery of evidence6
Nigeria’s data protection legal and institutional model: an overview6
EU data protection under the TCA: the UK adequacy decision and the twin GDPRs6
The interplay between machine learning and data minimization under the GDPR: the case of Google’s topics API6
Teachers in the loop? An analysis of automatic assessment systems under Article 22 GDPR5
A pragmatic compromise? The role of Article 88 GDPR in upholding privacy in the workplace5
Artificial intelligence in health care: data protection concerns in Malaysia4
Protection of genomic data and the Australian Privacy Act: when are genomic data ‘personal information’?4
Transferring personal data to international organizations under the GDPR: an analysis of the transfer mechanisms4
It is time to recognize the tort of invasion of privacy in Malaysia4
Correction to: Revisiting the definition of health data in the age of digitalized health care4
0.040296077728271