Policy and Internet

Papers
(The TQCC of Policy and Internet is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok49
Digital currencies, monetary sovereignty, and U.S.–China power competition40
Crowdsourcing: Citizens as coproducers of public services38
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making36
Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn towards platform regulation28
Regulation of platform market access by the United States and China: Neo‐mercantilism in digital services23
‘Too smart’: Infrastructuring the Internet through regional and rural smart policy in Australia19
Digital policy in European countries from the perspective of the Digital Economy and Society Index19
Unpacking government social media messaging strategies during the COVID‐19 pandemic in China18
Safe from “harm”: The governance of violence by platforms17
Consumer IoT and its under‐regulation: Findings from an Australian study16
Who is responsible for interventions against problematic comments? Comparing user attitudes in Germany and the United States16
Regulating the platform giants: Building and governing China's online economy15
Gatekeepers of toxicity: Reconceptualizing Twitter's abuse and hate speech policies14
Centrality and power. The struggle over the techno‐political configuration of the Internet and the global digital order12
The Internet and public policy: Future directions12
The neo‐regulation of internet platforms in the United Kingdom12
“Never good enough.” A situated understanding of the impact of digitalization on citizens living in a low socioeconomic position11
Regulating datafication and platformization: Policy silos and tradeoffs in international platform inquiries11
The Instagram/Facebook ban on graphic self‐harm imagery: A sentiment analysis and topic modeling approach11
Governing social eating (chibo) influencers: Policies, approach and politics of influencer governance in China10
Super‐amplifiers! The role of Twitter extended party networks in political elections10
Accepting but not engaging with it: Digital participation in local government‐run social credit systems in China10
The regulation of internet pornography: What a survey of under‐18s tells us about the necessity for and potential efficacy of emerging legislative approaches10
Governing with health code: Standardising China's data network systems during COVID‐1910
The making of “good” citizens: China's Social Credit Systems and infrastructures of social quantification10
Open Government Data: The OECD's Swiss army knife in the transformation of government9
Moving toward a “middle ground”?—The governance of platforms in the United States and China8
A comparative study on false information governance in Chinese and American social media platforms8
Rethinking the legal regulation of Internet platform monopoly in China8
GAFA's information infrastructure distribution: Interconnection dynamics in the global North versus global South7
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States7
Credibility in enhanced self‐regulation: The case of the European data protection regime6
Who is leading China's family planning policy discourse in Weibo? A social media text mining analysis6
Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers onXiaohongshu (Red)6
Back from the dead (again): The specter of the Fairness Doctrine and its lesson for social media regulation6
How does fake news spread? Understanding pathways of disinformation spread through APIs6
Research themes in big data analytics for policymaking: Insights from a mixed‐methods systematic literature review6
Invisible transparency: How different types of ad disclaimers on Facebook affect whether and how digital political advertising is perceived5
Digital diplomacy: Face management in MFA Twitter accounts5
E‐Government maturity assessment: Evidence from Greek municipalities5
Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance5
Data protection and tech startups: The need for attention, support, and scrutiny5
The barriers to regulating the online world: Insights from UK debates on online political advertising5
Political online participation and its effects: Theory, measurement, and results5
Investigating the potential of civil disagreement to decrease issue polarization in China4
Immigrants, deviants, and drug users: A rhetorical analysis of President Trump's fear‐driven tweets during the 2019 government shutdown4
Who is listening? Profiles of policymaker engagement with scientific communication4
Influencing the influencers: Regulating the morality of online conduct in Indonesia4
Hypernudging in the changing European regulatory landscape for digital markets4
Oegugin Influencers and pop nationalism through government campaigns: Regulating foreign‐nationals in the South Korean YouTube ecology4
The Internet regulation turn? Policy, Internet and technology4
The cloud sovereignty nexus: How the European Union seeks to reverse strategic dependencies in its digital ecosystem4
Rage or rationality: Exposure to Internet censorship and the impact on individual information behaviors in China4
Living in media and the era of regulation: Policy and Internet during a pandemic4
Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam4
Procedural rights as safeguard for human rights in platform regulation4
A policy impact tool: Measuring the policy impact of public participation in deliberative e‐rulemaking4
A process model of the public sphere: A case of municipal policy debates on Sina Weibo4
Digitalization and e‐government in the lives of urban migrants: Evidence from Bogotá4
0.024416923522949