Policy and Internet

Papers
(The median citation count of Policy and Internet is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
The client net state: Trajectories of state control over cyberspace87
Digital currencies, monetary sovereignty, and U.S.–China power competition55
Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance45
Rage or rationality: Exposure to Internet censorship and the impact on individual information behaviors in China36
National markets in a world of global platform giants: The persistence of Russian domestic competitors32
Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers onXiaohongshu (Red)25
From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok25
Where are the ethical guidelines? Examining the governance of digital technologies and AI in Nigeria24
Accepting but not engaging with it: Digital participation in local government‐run social credit systems in China24
Research themes in big data analytics for policymaking: Insights from a mixed‐methods systematic literature review22
Issue Information22
Consumer IoT and its under‐regulation: Findings from an Australian study21
Procedural rights as safeguard for human rights in platform regulation18
SAVE YOUR INTERNET! The persuasion work of YouTube in the controversy over EU's digital market directive18
17
Data justice in the “twin objective” of market and risk: How discrimination is formulated in EU's AI policy16
The political origins of platform economy regulations. Understanding variations in governing Airbnb and Uber across cities in Switzerland16
Unthinking Digital Sovereignty: A Critical Reflection on Origins, Objectives, and Practices15
Countering online terrorist content: A social regulation approach14
Watering down the wine: European Union regulation of violent right‐wing extremism content and the securitisation of new online spaces12
Rethinking the legal regulation of Internet platform monopoly in China12
Oegugin Influencers and pop nationalism through government campaigns: Regulating foreign‐nationals in the South Korean YouTube ecology12
The success of e‐participation. Learning lessons from Decide Madrid and We asked, You said, We did in Scotland12
Social media governance and strategies to combat online hatespeech in Germany12
Do fake online comments pose a threat to regulatory policymaking? Evidence from Internet regulation in the United States12
Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam12
Shedding light on transparency: A comprehensive study of state‐level transparency portals in Mexico11
Special issue: The (international) politics of content takedowns: Theory, practice, ethics11
The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy10
The (complex) effect of internet voting on turnout: Theoretical and methodological considerations10
Content takedowns and activist organizing: Impact of social media content moderation on activists and organizing10
Issue Information10
Issue Information9
9
A process model of the public sphere: A case of municipal policy debates on Sina Weibo9
Platform governance by competing systems of political economy: The United States and China9
Withdrawn: Power Relationships in China's Internet Governance9
Issue Information9
An exploratory study of social media's role in facilitating public participation in e‐rulemaking using computational text analysis tools8
Issue Information8
The unjust burden of digital inclusion for low‐income migrant parents7
Ghosts of YouTube: Rules and conventions in Japanese YouTube content creation outsourcing7
A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”7
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States7
7
Regulating Zhibo in China: Exploring multiple levels of self‐regulation and stakeholder dynamics7
Democracy in the digital era6
Can Facebook's community standards keep up with legal certainty? Content moderation governance under the pressure of the Digital Services Act6
Digitally skilled or digitally competent? Evaluating the impact of e‐Facilitation on young volunteers in Italy6
Issue Information6
Issue Information6
Blame and obligation: The importance of libertarianism and political orientation in the public assessment of disinformation in the United States6
Repackaging and Repurposing Digital Objects: A Conceptual Model to Understand the Malleability of Politics in Digital Environments6
The responsibility to protect online: Lessons from R2P and the politics of Western‐Centricity in online harms regulation6
Effects of online citizen participation on legitimacy beliefs in local government. Evidence from a comparative study of online participation platforms in three German municipalities5
Does the level of e‐government affect value‐added tax collection? A study conducted among the European Union Member States5
Policy is theft: The state of global Internet policy in an age of revolutions5
Digital diplomacy: Face management in MFA Twitter accounts5
Who is responsible for interventions against problematic comments? Comparing user attitudes in Germany and the United States5
Issue Information5
Open Government Data: The OECD's Swiss army knife in the transformation of government5
Social imaginaries of digital technology in South Korea during the COVID‐19 pandemic4
Understanding Chinese Internet users' information sensitivity in big data and artificial intelligence era4
Political online participation and its effects: Theory, measurement, and results4
The cloud sovereignty nexus: How the European Union seeks to reverse strategic dependencies in its digital ecosystem4
Models of State Digital Sovereignty From the Global South: Diverging Experiences From China, India and South Africa4
Mediated trust, the internet and artificial intelligence: Ideas, interests, institutions and futures4
Who is leading China's family planning policy discourse in Weibo? A social media text mining analysis4
What is the role of civil society in Internet governance? Confronting institutional passive perspectives with resource mobilization in Portugal4
A conceptual framework to explore considerations of the social implications in internet of things and smart city governance and policy: The case of Thailand4
Enhancing Public Health Policy Communication Through Government–Citizen Social Media Interactions: The Impact of Replying Agents, Inquiry Tone, and Institutional Trust4
Transitional affordances: A longitudinal mixed‐method study on the context and effects of changing mode of online access4
Regulating datafication and platformization: Policy silos and tradeoffs in international platform inquiries4
“Never good enough.” A situated understanding of the impact of digitalization on citizens living in a low socioeconomic position4
Content moderation and the digital transformations of gatekeeping4
Lessons from France on the regulation of Internet pornography: How displacement effects, circumvention, and legislative scope may limit the efficacy of Article 234
GAFA's information infrastructure distribution: Interconnection dynamics in the global North versus global South4
Hate speech on social media against German mayors: Extent of the phenomenon, reactions, and implications3
Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn towards platform regulation3
Feminist struggles against criminalization of digital violence: Lessons for Internet governance from the global south3
3
Crowdfunding platforms as conduits for ideological struggle and extremism: On the need for greater regulation and digital constitutionalism3
Digital citizen participation in policy conflict and concord: Evaluation of a web‐based planning tool for railroad infrastructure3
Issue Information3
Data sovereignty: The next frontier for internet policy?3
Core concerns: The need for a governance framework to protect global Internet infrastructure3
Invisible transparency: How different types of ad disclaimers on Facebook affect whether and how digital political advertising is perceived3
A new social contract for technology3
Patchwork Governance on KidTok: Balancing Regulation and Community Norms3
Living in media and the era of regulation: Policy and Internet during a pandemic3
What is an online political advert? An interrogation of conceptual challenges in the formation of digital policy response3
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making2
2
Social media and politics on the local level2
2
2
The capricious relationship between technology and democracy: Analyzing public policy discussions in the UK and US2
A legal cure for news choice overload: Regulating algorithms and AI with ‘light patterns’ to foster autonomy and democracy2
Data protection and tech startups: The need for attention, support, and scrutiny2
Platform regulation from the bottom up: Judicial redress in the United States and China2
A comparative study on false information governance in Chinese and American social media platforms2
Sanctions and infrastructural ideologies: Assessing the material shaping of EU digital sovereignty in response to the war in Ukraine2
2
Scholarly research and user‐centred policy design2
Issue Information2
‘Too smart’: Infrastructuring the Internet through regional and rural smart policy in Australia2
Quantifying water effluent violations and enforcement impacts using causal AI2
Who is listening? Profiles of policymaker engagement with scientific communication2
Resisting and Claiming Digital Sovereignty: The Cases of Civil Society and Indigenous Groups2
Reciprocity and asymmetry in digital diplomacy: Geopolitics of national identity in South Korea–Japan and South Korea–US relations2
0.16819286346436