Communication Methods and Measures

Papers
(The median citation count of Communication Methods and Measures is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Uncovering Hidden Media Framings in Generic Communication Competence Assessments: Is the Face-To-Face Context the Default Framing?121
A Dynamic Dyadic Systems Perspective on Communication of Real-Time Support Between Graduate Women in STEM and Their Mentor79
Is Older Indeed Wiser? Identifying Conflict Communication Patterns in Older and Younger Dating Couples57
Automatically Finding Actors in Texts: A Performance Review of Multilingual Named Entity Recognition Tools32
Message Deletion on Telegram: Affected Data Types and Implications for Computational Analysis28
Beyond the binary? Automated gender classification of social media profiles25
Felt Time Scale (FTS): Measuring how people experience screen time22
Automated Visual Analysis for the Study of Social Media Effects: Opportunities, Approaches, and Challenges20
Correction20
An Analysis of Turn Transitions and Conversational Motifs in Parent-Adolescent Emotion-Focused Interactions19
Speaker landscapes: machine learning opens a window on the everyday language of opinion18
How credible are published significant results: estimating average true power with P-Curve or Z-curve?15
Acknowledgement14
Coefficient alpha and reliability of communication science measurement scales: A note on Hayes and Coutts13
Communication Quality Analysis: A User-friendly Observational Measure of Patient–Clinician Communication11
Development and Validation of the Need for Privacy Scale (NFP-S)11
Comparison Conditions in Research on Persuasive Message Effects: Aligning Evidence and Claims About Persuasiveness10
The Search for Solid Ground in Text as Data: A Systematic Review of Validation Practices and Practical Recommendations for Validation10
Computer Vision and Internet Meme Genealogy: An Evaluation of Image Feature Matching as a Technique for Pattern Detection10
Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data10
Critical, but constructive: defining, detecting, and addressing bias in Computational Social Science9
A Systematic Literature Review of Latent Variable Mixture Modeling in Communication Scholarship8
The public that engages invisibly: what visible engagement fails to capture in online political communication8
Conceptualizing and Examining Change in Communication Research7
Promises and Pitfalls of Social Media Data Donations7
Can we use automated approaches to measure the quality of online political discussion? How to (not) measure interactivity, diversity, rationality, and incivility in online comments to the news7
Beyond sentiment: an algorithmic strategy for identifying evaluations within large text corpora7
Using hidden Markov models to assess and correct for measurement error in digital trace data7
Message-level Claims Require Message-level Data Analyses: Aligning Claims and Evidence in Communication Research6
Exploring temporal dynamics in digital trace data: mining user-sequences for communication research5
The Extended Morality as Cooperation Dictionary (eMACD): A Crowd-Sourced Approach via the Moral Narrative Analyzer Platform5
Comparing Chatbots and Online Surveys for (Longitudinal) Data Collection: An Investigation of Response Characteristics, Data Quality, and User Evaluation5
Lifting the Veil on the Use of Big Data News Repositories: A Documentation and Critical Discussion of A Protest Event Analysis4
Linkage Analysis Revised – Linking Digital Traces and Survey Data4
Navigating Ambiguities: A Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Detection Methods in Communication Research4
Digital Trace Data Collection for Social Media Effects Research: APIs, Data Donation, and (Screen) Tracking4
What’s in a name? The effect of named entities on topic modelling interpretability4
Training Versus Responsiveness in Supportive Interactions Employing Confederates: A Dynamic Dyadic Systems Approach4
0.054874897003174