Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The TQCC of Research Synthesis Methods is 7. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity198
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching151
Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review132
Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists109
Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review73
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool71
On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis68
Improving the reporting quality of reliability generalization meta‐analyses: The REGEMA checklist58
Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews57
Meta‐analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one‐stageMASEM44
Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance40
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis39
Estimating publication bias in meta‐analyses of peer‐reviewed studies: A meta‐meta‐analysis across disciplines and journal tiers38
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods33
Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study30
The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross‐sectional study25
Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review25
Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages25
Using information‐theoretic approaches for model selection in meta‐analysis23
Data sharing—trialists' plans at registration, attitudes, barriers and facilitators: A cohort study and cross‐sectional survey22
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews22
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data18
Including non‐English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low‐cost sources of translation support18
Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production17
Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review17
What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study17
The ScHARR LMIC filter: Adapting a low‐ and middle‐income countries geographic search filter to identify studies on preterm birth prevention and management17
Synthesis of evidence from zero‐events studies: A comparison of one‐stage framework methods17
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments17
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature17
Extracting data from graphs: A case‐study on animal research with implications for meta‐analyses16
Applying machine classifiers to update searches: Analysis from two case studies16
Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor15
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough15
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient15
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity15
Alternative weighting schemes when performing matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons15
Using Monte Carlo experiments to select meta‐analytic estimators14
Cluster wild bootstrapping to handle dependent effect sizes in meta‐analysis with a small number of studies14
Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review13
Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: How rapid could it be?13
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication12
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste12
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects11
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews11
11
Cumulative meta‐analysis: What works11
An evidence‐splitting approach to evaluation of direct‐indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta‐analysis11
Study specific prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis: A tutorial10
CLUSTER searching approach to inform evidence syntheses: A methodological review10
Synthesizing cross‐design evidence and cross‐format data using network meta‐regression10
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics10
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis10
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts10
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis10
Meta‐analyzing individual participant data from studies with complex survey designs: A tutorial on using the two‐stage approach for data from educational large‐scale a10
Location‐scale models for meta‐analysis10
Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals—A methodological study10
Systematic review of the methodological literature for integrating qualitative evidence syntheses into health guideline development9
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study9
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression9
Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial9
Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random‐effects meta‐analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods9
Comparison and validation of metadta for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies9
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study9
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing9
Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?8
Bayesian meta‐analysis usingSAS PROC BGLIMM8
Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies8
A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study8
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods8
The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology8
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions7
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis7
Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals7
Quantifying the robustness of primary analysis results: A case study on missing outcome data in pairwise and network meta‐analysis7
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework7
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation7
When is the evidence conclusive? Analysis of systematic reviews for which Cochrane declared that conclusions will not change with further studies7
A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta‐analysis7
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review7
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians7
0.046878099441528