Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis195
Lord’s Paradox and two network meta-analysis models160
How to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis in response to an emerging pathogen: Lessons learned from Zika and COVID-19142
Bayesian workflow for bias-adjustment model in meta-analysis127
Meta-analytic-predictive priors based on a single study110
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions100
Transforming evidence synthesis: A systematic review of the evolution of automated meta-analysis in the age of AI81
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools77
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis76
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study67
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans59
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies58
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies55
47
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences45
Authors’ reply: Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews41
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication40
Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis40
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses36
Evaluation of the replicability of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of the effects of health interventions34
Estimands and their implications for evidence synthesis for oncology: A simulation study of treatment switching in meta-analysis34
Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools32
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis32
Evaluation of semi-automated record screening methods for systematic reviews of prognosis studies and intervention studies30
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening29
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal29
Incorporating the possibility of cure into network meta-analyses: A case study from resected Stage III/IV melanoma28
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews28
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers28
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study27
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models27
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes27
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit24
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions24
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome24
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects22
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data20
Issue Information19
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review18
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?18
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study18
18
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study18
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis18
Combining search filters for randomized controlled trials with the Cochrane RCT Classifier in Covidence: a methodological validation study16
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example16
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments15
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis15
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study15
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis14
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews14
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs14
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”14
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies13
A causal meta-analysis framework for clinical trials with unequal randomization ratios12
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall12
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold12
Issue Information12
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data12
12
Issue Information12
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters11
Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis11
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review11
Assessing risk of bias of cohort studies with large language models11
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies11
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology11
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research11
Using Elicit AI research assistant for data extraction in systematic reviews: A feasibility study across environmental and life sciences11
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed11
Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews11
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model11
10
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes10
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies10
Issue Information9
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review9
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework9
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review9
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology9
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond9
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis9
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back9
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons9
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts8
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach8
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers8
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection8
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard8
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study8
StudyTypeTeller—Large language models to automatically classify research study types for systematic reviews8
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice8
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach8
Issue Information8
Meta-analytic pooling of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates8
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany8
8
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?8
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient8
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference8
Issue Information7
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians7
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base7
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review7
7
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs7
Bayes factor hypothesis testing in meta-analyses: Practical advantages and methodological considerations7
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews7
Personalized treatment hierarchies in Bayesian network meta-analysis6
Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis based on an exact within-study variance calculation method6
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome6
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews6
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study6
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”6
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges6
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis6
Shiny-MAGEC: A Bayesian R shiny application for meta-analysis of censored adverse events6
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor6
The hazards of using hazard ratios from proportional hazard models in indirect treatment comparisons6
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics5
Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms5
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective5
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses5
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression5
What level of automation is “good enough”? A benchmark of large language models for meta-analysis data extraction5
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics5
Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider5
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism5
5
BibliZap: An exploratory evaluation of an automated multi-level citation searching tool for systematic and rapid reviews5
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity5
Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review5
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance5
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects5
Barriers to searching for grey literature in systematic reviews: A survey of authors and editors4
4
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties4
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research4
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them4
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”4
Back-transformations in random-effects meta-analysis—Impact and interpretation4
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies4
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature4
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation4
Methods of multi-indication meta-analysis for health technology assessment: A simulation study4
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis4
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio4
Aggregating and analysing clinical trials data from multiple public registers using R package ctrdata4
How comprehensive is comprehensive? Prevalence of searches beyond peer-reviewed journal articles and bibliographic sources: a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews4
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?4
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison4
Reverse chronology quota record screening for realist synthesis: Fostering causally rich extrapolations with a diverse and contemporaneous sample of literature4
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”4
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis4
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis4
4
Simple imputation method for meta-analysis of survival rates when precision information is missing4
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study4
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study3
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods3
Development of the individual participant data integrity tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data3
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews3
Beyond human gold standards: A multimodel framework for automated abstract classification and information extraction3
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies3
3
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models3
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials3
Meta-regression with categorical moderators and dependent effect sizes: A simulation study3
3
The application of ROBINS-I guidance in systematic reviews of non-randomised studies: A descriptive study3
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews3
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews3
Automating the data extraction process for systematic reviews using GPT-4o and o33
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies3
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology3
What happens to qualitative studies initially presented as conference abstracts: A survey among study authors3
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies3
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation3
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis3
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis3
0.4207010269165