Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies360
Lord’s Paradox and two network meta-analysis models316
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study170
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration143
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans140
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis123
Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation116
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions92
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis78
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies74
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools69
50
49
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences48
Authors’ reply: Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews36
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication35
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews34
Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis33
Evaluation of semi-automated record screening methods for systematic reviews of prognosis studies and intervention studies32
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis31
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses30
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers27
Incorporating the possibility of cure into network meta-analyses: A case study from resected Stage III/IV melanoma26
Estimands and their implications for evidence synthesis for oncology: A simulation study of treatment switching in meta-analysis26
Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools24
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening24
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal24
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta‐analyses—A scoping review23
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models23
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome22
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study22
Regarding approaches to simulating random‐effects22
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects21
Issue Information21
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes20
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions19
Issue Information19
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data19
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit19
18
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study18
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review18
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews17
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”16
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis16
Combining search filters for randomized controlled trials with the Cochrane RCT Classifier in Covidence: a methodological validation study16
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data15
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?15
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis15
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example15
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study15
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study15
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies14
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments14
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis13
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs12
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall12
12
11
Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID‐19‐related Cochrane Rapid Reviews11
Issue Information11
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold11
Issue Information10
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters10
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data10
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review10
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology10
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies10
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes9
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research9
Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis9
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies9
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed9
Assessing risk of bias of cohort studies with large language models9
Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews9
8
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology8
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review8
Issue Information8
8
StudyTypeTeller—Large language models to automatically classify research study types for systematic reviews8
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model8
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back8
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection8
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis8
Issue Information7
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis7
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework7
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study7
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers7
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review7
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts7
7
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient7
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach7
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons7
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool7
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond7
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach7
On the bias of complete‐ and shifting‐case meta‐regressions with missing covariates6
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany6
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians6
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review6
Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow‐up study6
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference6
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard6
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice6
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?6
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews6
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching6
Issue Information5
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base5
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews5
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”5
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor5
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs5
Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms5
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges5
5
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis5
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism4
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity4
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study4
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics4
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance4
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties4
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation4
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective4
Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review4
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome4
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects4
4
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis4
Methods of multi-indication meta-analysis for health technology assessment: A simulation study4
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses4
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics4
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing4
4
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression4
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison4
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”4
Simple imputation method for meta-analysis of survival rates when precision information is missing3
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis3
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study3
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?3
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste3
Issue Information3
3
Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta‐analysis3
3
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research3
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity3
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio3
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis3
3
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis3
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies3
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies3
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them3
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature3
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”3
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews3
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation3
The application of ROBINS-I guidance in systematic reviews of non-randomised studies: A descriptive study3
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation2
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews2
Bayesian pairwise meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes in the presence of non‐proportional hazards: A simulation study of flexible parametric, piecewise exponential and fractional polynomial models2
Automating the data extraction process for systematic reviews using GPT-4o and o32
2
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials2
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives2
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models2
What happens to qualitative studies initially presented as conference abstracts: A survey among study authors2
A non‐parametric approach for jointly combining evidence on progression free and overall survival time in network meta‐analysis2
What can we learn from 1,000 meta-analyses across 10 different disciplines?2
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies2
How trace plots help interpret meta‐analysis results2
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis2
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies2
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods2
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results2
Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study2
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform2
Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials2
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology2
Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making2
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study2
Development of the individual participant data integrity tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data2
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews2
0.1999249458313