Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis235
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools181
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans158
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis152
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study121
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies105
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions89
Bayesian workflow for bias-adjustment model in meta-analysis88
Meta-analytic-predictive priors based on a single study85
How to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis in response to an emerging pathogen: Lessons learned from Zika and COVID-1977
Lord’s Paradox and two network meta-analysis models70
Transforming evidence synthesis: A systematic review of the evolution of automated meta-analysis in the age of AI62
62
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences58
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication50
Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis48
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses46
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers43
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening40
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews37
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study36
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models35
Authors’ reply: Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews34
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis32
Evaluation of the replicability of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of the effects of health interventions31
Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools30
Evaluation of semi-automated record screening methods for systematic reviews of prognosis studies and intervention studies29
A meta-research review of the use of flexible meta-regression in biomedical systematic reviews published between 2011 and 202129
Incorporating the possibility of cure into network meta-analyses: A case study from resected Stage III/IV melanoma29
Estimands and their implications for evidence synthesis for oncology: A simulation study of treatment switching in meta-analysis27
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions26
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data25
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes23
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome22
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit21
Issue Information20
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects20
19
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”19
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis19
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study19
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study19
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?18
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study18
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example18
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review17
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews16
Combining search filters for randomized controlled trials with the Cochrane RCT Classifier in Covidence: a methodological validation study16
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments16
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis16
Mixed-effects two-stage residual inclusion methods for individual patient data meta-analysis: A methodological framework for causal inference in survival analysis15
Issue Information15
A causal meta-analysis framework for clinical trials with unequal randomization ratios15
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies15
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall15
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data14
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold14
14
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology13
Issue Information13
Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis12
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research12
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters12
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed11
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies11
Assessing risk of bias of cohort studies with large language models11
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review11
Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews11
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes11
Using Elicit AI research assistant for data extraction in systematic reviews: A feasibility study across environmental and life sciences11
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies11
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model11
Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study10
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology10
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons10
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts10
10
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review10
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back10
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis10
Issue Information10
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review10
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection10
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice9
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach9
Meta-analytic pooling of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates9
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient9
9
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach9
NMADTA: An R package for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests9
Issue Information9
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers9
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond9
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study9
StudyTypeTeller—Large language models to automatically classify research study types for systematic reviews9
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews8
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany8
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians8
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?8
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review8
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference8
Bayes factor hypothesis testing in meta-analyses: Practical advantages and methodological considerations7
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base7
Treatment switching in evidence synthesis in oncology: A systematic review of current meta-analytical practices7
7
Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach7
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs6
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study6
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor6
Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms6
BibliZap: An exploratory evaluation of an automated multi-level citation searching tool for systematic and rapid reviews6
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”6
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics6
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome6
Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis based on an exact within-study variance calculation method6
Shiny-MAGEC: A Bayesian R shiny application for meta-analysis of censored adverse events6
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis6
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews6
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges6
The hazards of using hazard ratios from proportional hazard models in indirect treatment comparisons6
Personalized treatment hierarchies in Bayesian network meta-analysis6
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance5
Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review5
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism5
Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider5
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties5
Incorporating estimands into meta-analyses of clinical trials5
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics5
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective5
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression5
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation5
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects5
5
What level of automation is “good enough”? A benchmark of large language models for meta-analysis data extraction5
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses5
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity5
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”5
5
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison4
Methods of multi-indication meta-analysis for health technology assessment: A simulation study4
Aggregating and analysing clinical trials data from multiple public registers using R package ctrdata4
Back-transformations in random-effects meta-analysis—Impact and interpretation4
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews4
Reverse chronology quota record screening for realist synthesis: Fostering causally rich extrapolations with a diverse and contemporaneous sample of literature4
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis4
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study4
Simple imputation method for meta-analysis of survival rates when precision information is missing4
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis4
4
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio4
Barriers to searching for grey literature in systematic reviews: A survey of authors and editors4
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them4
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis4
How comprehensive is comprehensive? Prevalence of searches beyond peer-reviewed journal articles and bibliographic sources: a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews4
4
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies4
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research4
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies3
Beyond human gold standards: A multimodel framework for automated abstract classification and information extraction3
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies3
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology3
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study3
Meta-regression with categorical moderators and dependent effect sizes: A simulation study3
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews3
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation3
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies3
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews3
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis3
A comparison of preprint search aggregators: comprehensive identification of preprints in the information retrieval stage of evidence syntheses3
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis3
The application of ROBINS-I guidance in systematic reviews of non-randomised studies: A descriptive study3
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials3
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods3
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models3
Automating the data extraction process for systematic reviews using GPT-4o and o33
0.039355993270874