Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity198
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching151
Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review132
Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists109
Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review73
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool71
On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis68
Improving the reporting quality of reliability generalization meta‐analyses: The REGEMA checklist58
Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews57
Meta‐analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one‐stageMASEM44
Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance40
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis39
Estimating publication bias in meta‐analyses of peer‐reviewed studies: A meta‐meta‐analysis across disciplines and journal tiers38
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods33
Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study30
Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review25
Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages25
The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross‐sectional study25
Using information‐theoretic approaches for model selection in meta‐analysis23
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews22
Data sharing—trialists' plans at registration, attitudes, barriers and facilitators: A cohort study and cross‐sectional survey22
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data18
Including non‐English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low‐cost sources of translation support18
The ScHARR LMIC filter: Adapting a low‐ and middle‐income countries geographic search filter to identify studies on preterm birth prevention and management17
Synthesis of evidence from zero‐events studies: A comparison of one‐stage framework methods17
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments17
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature17
Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production17
Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review17
What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study17
Extracting data from graphs: A case‐study on animal research with implications for meta‐analyses16
Applying machine classifiers to update searches: Analysis from two case studies16
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient15
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity15
Alternative weighting schemes when performing matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons15
Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor15
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough15
Using Monte Carlo experiments to select meta‐analytic estimators14
Cluster wild bootstrapping to handle dependent effect sizes in meta‐analysis with a small number of studies14
Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: How rapid could it be?13
Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review13
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste12
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication12
Cumulative meta‐analysis: What works11
An evidence‐splitting approach to evaluation of direct‐indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta‐analysis11
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects11
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews11
11
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics10
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis10
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts10
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis10
Meta‐analyzing individual participant data from studies with complex survey designs: A tutorial on using the two‐stage approach for data from educational large‐scale a10
Location‐scale models for meta‐analysis10
Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals—A methodological study10
Study specific prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis: A tutorial10
CLUSTER searching approach to inform evidence syntheses: A methodological review10
Synthesizing cross‐design evidence and cross‐format data using network meta‐regression10
Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial9
Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random‐effects meta‐analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods9
Comparison and validation of metadta for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies9
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study9
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing9
Systematic review of the methodological literature for integrating qualitative evidence syntheses into health guideline development9
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study9
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression9
A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study8
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods8
The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology8
Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?8
Bayesian meta‐analysis usingSAS PROC BGLIMM8
Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies8
When is the evidence conclusive? Analysis of systematic reviews for which Cochrane declared that conclusions will not change with further studies7
A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta‐analysis7
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review7
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians7
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions7
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis7
Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals7
Quantifying the robustness of primary analysis results: A case study on missing outcome data in pairwise and network meta‐analysis7
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework7
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation7
Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance6
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis6
Predicting personalised absolute treatment effects in individual participant data meta‐analysis: An introduction to splines6
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis6
Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices6
Additional considerations and response to ‘graphical representation of overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)’6
Investigation of text‐mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy—a case study6
Lessons learnt: Undertaking rapid reviews on public health and social measures during a global pandemic6
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study6
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta‐analyses—A scoping review6
A cautionary note on the use of G‐computation in population adjustment6
Critical appraisal in ecology: What tools are available, and what is being used in systematic reviews?6
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review5
On ratio measures of heterogeneity for meta‐analyses5
Network meta‐interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses5
Case study meta‐analysis in the social sciences. Insights on data quality and reliability from a large‐N case survey5
A technical review of three clinical trials register resources indicates where improvements to the search interfaces are needed5
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results5
Meta‐regression methods to characterize evidence strength using meaningful‐effect percentages conditional on study characteristics5
MA‐cont:pre/post effect size: An interactive tool for the meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes using R Shiny5
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies5
Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression5
A comparison of hypothesis tests for homogeneity in meta‐analysis with focus on rare binary events5
Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews5
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions5
Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non‐pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta‐analyses5
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses5
Effect estimates can be accurately calculated with data digitally extracted from interrupted time series graphs4
PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of community‐augmented meta‐analyses in psychology4
Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta‐analysis4
How to observe the principle of concurrent control in an arm‐based meta‐analysis using SAS procedures GLIMMIX and BGLIMM4
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies4
Advancing the methodology of mapping reviews: A scoping review4
Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews4
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal4
A rule‐based approach for automatically extracting data from systematic reviews and their updates to model the risk of conclusion change4
Estimating the reference interval from a fixed effects meta‐analysis4
Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non‐Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO4
Selecting relevant moderators with Bayesian regularized meta‐regression4
On the bias of complete‐ and shifting‐case meta‐regressions with missing covariates4
A real‐world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review4
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models4
Network meta‐analysis results against a fictional treatment of average performance: Treatment effects and ranking metric4
Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non‐Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta‐research study4
4
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis4
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”4
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform3
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews3
Capturing the underlying distribution in meta‐analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals3
SeroTracker‐RoB: A decision rule‐based algorithm for reproducible risk of bias assessment of seroprevalence studies3
The consequences of neglected confounding and interactions in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: An illustrative example3
3
A framework for synthesizing intervention evidence from multiple sources into a single certainty of evidence rating: Methodological developments from a US National Academies of S3
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies3
A non‐parametric approach for jointly combining evidence on progression free and overall survival time in network meta‐analysis3
ABCMETAapp: R shiny application for simulation‐based estimation of mean and standard deviation for meta‐analysis via approximate Bayesian computation3
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?3
On the double‐robustness and semiparametric efficiency of matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons3
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies3
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance3
Comparison of statistical methods for integrating real‐world evidence in a rare events meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials3
Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach3
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis3
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review3
Meta‐analysis and partial correlation coefficients: A matter of weights3
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration3
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome2
More than words: Novel visualizations for evidence synthesis2
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology2
DTAmetasa: An R shiny application for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy and sensitivity analysis of publication bias2
2
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference2
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study2
Reporting of test comparisons in diagnostic accuracy studies: A literature review2
Exploring the relevance of the effect of geographical location when searching for studies using Google Search2
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools2
Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study2
Catchii: Empowering literature review screening in healthcare2
Measurement error in meta‐analysis (MEMA)—A Bayesian framework for continuous outcome data subject to non‐differential measurement error2
Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta‐analysis2
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard2
Searching for medical devices – Practical guidance2
A confidence interval robust to publication bias for random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies2
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit2
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons2
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives2
A comparison of machine learning methods to find clinical trials for inclusion in new systematic reviews from their PROSPERO registrations prior to searching and screening2
Four alternative methodologies for simulated treatment comparison: How could the use of simulation be re‐invigorated?2
Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID‐19‐related Cochrane Rapid Reviews2
End‐user understanding of qualitative comparative analysis used within evidence synthesis: A mixed‐methods study2
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs2
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?2
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example2
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio2
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach2
Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation2
0.31328892707825