Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives246
Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making215
Comment on a review of methods to assess publication and other reporting biases in meta‐analysis138
Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non‐pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta‐analyses106
Adherence to conflicts of interest policy in Cochrane reviews where authors are also editorial board members: A cross‐sectional analysis102
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance75
Automated data analysis of unstructured grey literature in health research: A mapping review58
Estimating the reference interval from a fixed effects meta‐analysis53
Issue Information50
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism49
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes47
Issue Information37
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies34
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis31
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions30
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies30
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model30
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration27
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective27
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough26
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools25
22
Response to Kim et al. “When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?”21
A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study21
Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression21
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies19
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses18
Additional considerations and response to ‘graphical representation of overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)’18
Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials17
Development of the individual participant data integrity tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data17
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans17
How trace plots help interpret meta‐analysis results16
Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation16
A framework for synthesizing intervention evidence from multiple sources into a single certainty of evidence rating: Methodological developments from a US National Academies of S15
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation15
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing15
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression15
Including non‐English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low‐cost sources of translation support15
Case study meta‐analysis in the social sciences. Insights on data quality and reliability from a large‐N case survey15
Broad versus narrow research questions in evidence synthesis: A parallel to (and plea for) estimands15
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects14
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study14
Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study13
The impact of continuity correction methods in Cochrane reviews with single‐zero trials with rare events: A meta‐epidemiological study13
13
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta‐analyses—A scoping review13
Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta‐analysis13
Issue Information12
Bayesian pairwise meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes in the presence of non‐proportional hazards: A simulation study of flexible parametric, piecewise exponential and fractional polynomial models12
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back12
Combining endpoint and change data did not affect the summary standardised mean difference in pairwise and network meta‐analyses: An empirical study in depression12
Meta‐analysis and partial correlation coefficients: A matter of weights11
Issue Information11
11
Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: How rapid could it be?10
On the double‐robustness and semiparametric efficiency of matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons10
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences10
10
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection10
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis10
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening10
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond9
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis9
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis9
9
Graphical evaluation of evidence structure within a component network meta‐analysis9
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review8
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews8
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology8
Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing8
8
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation7
Issue Information7
7
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis7
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication7
Issue Information7
Sensitivity analysis for the interactive effects of internal bias and publication bias in meta‐analyses7
Issue Information7
Conducting power analysis for meta‐analysis with dependent effect sizes: Common guidelines and an introduction to the POMADE R package7
A REML method for the evidence‐splitting model in network meta‐analysis7
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”7
PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of community‐augmented meta‐analyses in psychology7
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal6
Bayesian meta‐analysis usingSAS PROC BGLIMM6
6
Synthesizing cross‐design evidence and cross‐format data using network meta‐regression6
Bayesian meta‐analysis for evaluating treatment effectiveness in biomarker subgroups using trials of mixed patient populations6
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review6
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison6
Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals—A methodological study6
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons6
Exploring the relevance of the effect of geographical location when searching for studies using Google Search6
Adapting how to use Google Search to identify studies for systematic reviews in view of a recent change to how search results are displayed6
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models5
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study5
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses5
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature5
Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices5
Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study5
Network meta‐interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses5
MA‐cont:pre/post effect size: An interactive tool for the meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes using R Shiny5
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts5
CLUSTER searching approach to inform evidence syntheses: A methodological review5
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework5
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool5
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study5
Bayesian sparse modeling to identify high‐risk subgroups in meta‐analysis of safety data4
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity4
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient4
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers4
Can machine learning help accelerate article screening for systematic reviews? Yes, when article separability in embedding space is high4
4
Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review4
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties4
Response to: Briscoe “Exploring the relevance of the effect of geographical location when searching for studies using Google Search”4
3
P‐hacking in meta‐analyses: A formalization and new meta‐analytic methods3
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication3
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research3
Issue Information3
Combining meta‐epidemiological study datasets on commercial funding of randomised clinical trials: Database, methods, and descriptive results of the COMFIT study3
Cumulative meta‐analysis: What works3
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions3
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study3
Meta‐regression methods to characterize evidence strength using meaningful‐effect percentages conditional on study characteristics3
Regarding approaches to simulating random‐effects3
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions3
The consequences of neglected confounding and interactions in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: An illustrative example3
Issue Information3
3
Effect estimates can be accurately calculated with data digitally extracted from interrupted time series graphs3
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit3
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach3
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data2
Cluster wild bootstrapping to handle dependent effect sizes in meta‐analysis with a small number of studies2
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis2
A real‐world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review2
Data sharing policies across health research globally: Cross‐sectional meta‐research study2
Issue Information2
Lessons learnt: Undertaking rapid reviews on public health and social measures during a global pandemic2
2
Selecting relevant moderators with Bayesian regularized meta‐regression2
Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review2
Meta-analytic rain cloud plots: Improving evidence communication through data visualization design principles2
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes2
Accounting for time dependency in meta‐analyses of concordance probability estimates2
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study2
Searching for medical devices – Practical guidance2
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste2
Reply to “Comment on a review of methods to assess publication and other reporting biases in meta‐analysis”2
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects2
Synthesis of evidence from zero‐events studies: A comparison of one‐stage framework methods2
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach2
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome2
Location‐scale models for meta‐analysis2
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio2
Meta‐analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one‐stageMASEM2
Issue Information2
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies2
Issue Information2
The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology2
Quantitative bias analysis for unmeasured confounding in unanchored population-adjusted indirect comparisons2
On the bias of complete‐ and shifting‐case meta‐regressions with missing covariates1
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review1
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”1
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods1
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews1
Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor1
Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews1
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data1
Visualizing the assumptions of network meta‐analysis1
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study1
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard1
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?1
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference1
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany1
Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews1
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis1
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews1
Issue Information1
Combining randomized and non‐randomized data to predict heterogeneous effects of competing treatments1
A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta‐analysis1
Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews1
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews1
Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial1
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?1
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example1
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study1
On ratio measures of heterogeneity for meta‐analyses1
Enhancing recall in automated record screening: A resampling algorithm1
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis1
A critical assessment of matching-adjusted indirect comparisons in relation to target populations1
Response to discussant comments on “NMA, the first 20 years”1
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review1
The impact of correction methods on rare‐event meta‐analysis1
Issue Information1
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments1
1
Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages1
Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: A follow‐up study to evaluate the performance of various automated methods for reference de‐duplication1
Methods for information-sharing in network meta-analysis: Implications for inference and policy1
Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow‐up study1
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”1
Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?1
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis1
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study1
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians1
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice1
0.062907934188843