Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P

Papers
(The median citation count of Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Not all “small business” is the same, and I-O has shoulders to stand on – CORRIGENDUM80
Embedding moral reframing in organizational policies for lasting DEI impact41
Revisiting the paradox of replication: Is the solution to the paradox big data style research or something else?26
A pragmatic framing perspective on DEI training26
Presidential memorandum on return to in-person work: Implications for the federal workforce23
Curiosity is the key to the future of learning and development22
Activism or science? Navigating the tension between objectivity and advocacy in DEI research21
Leveraging quiet: The power of choosing your workspace20
Personality and rater bias: How personality traits influence rater bias and training proficiency20
Work can be good; not all work is good—let’s make it better19
How abduction can help produce timelier technology research19
The importance of representativeness as well as timeliness in studying technology: Three additional suggestions19
Increasing the saliency of ethical decision making for SIOP members19
Anti-work offers many opportunities for I-O psychologists16
Organizational research on weight stigma must center targets’ perspectives15
(Conditionally) Supporting polycultural organizations through bidirectional allyship13
Moving from opposition to taking ownership of open science to make discoveries that matter13
How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public12
The impact of recent executive orders on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in research and graduate training in industrial-organizational psychology12
“404 error—interdisciplinarity not found”: Removing barriers to technology research in I-O psychology11
POSH, plus nonvisible disabilities11
The unequal burden of DEI bans11
Understanding intervention effects using a desirability and foreseeability typology11
Minding the gap: Mindful inclusion of opposing perspectives to protect DEI initiatives9
Cybervetting: Facebook is dead, long live LinkedIn?9
It takes a [helpful] village: Recognizing and minimizing unhelpful help to better support female caregivers in academia9
Interpreting the magnitude of predictor effect sizes: It is time for more sensible benchmarks9
Breaking the sound barrier: Quiet spaces may also foster inclusivity for the neurodiverse community9
Enjoy the silence: Providing space for introverted employees to thrive8
Beyond organizational size: Recommendations for addressing the scientist–practitioner gap8
Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation7
Too early to call: What we do (not) know about the validity of cybervetting7
Optimizing an online I-O program: Tips and lessons learned from launching an online master’s program7
Bridging the academic–practice gap through big team science initiatives7
IOP volume 15 issue 4 Cover and Front matter6
Addressing labor gaps with the science of workplace learning6
The importance of reflective practices for decision makers: A possible part of the solution for helping the field6
Was Keynes thwarted by consumerism? Insatiable needs, voluntary simplicity, and the pursuit of leisure5
Antiwork or antimaster? Reframing the antiwork movement through a racial lens5
Twinks, jocks, and bears—oh my! The stereotype content model extended to gay men and weight at work5
The dual role of faculty and motherhood: Enabling resources for successful coping5
Igniting progress: SIOP’s role in advocating DEI policy change5
Beyond learning outcomes: Creating equitable learning environments in online I-O graduate education5
Addressing antiwork concerns through nonwork identity: Beyond an emphasis on meaningful work4
Don’t get bogged down by the backlash4
Industrial and organizational psychology stakeholders and collaborators must include economists, political scientists, and policy makers4
The weight of beauty in psychological research4
Sensibility over urgency: Applying a prudent researcher standard to timelier technology research4
Future-proofing I-O psychology: The need for updated graduate curriculum4
Catching up in two races: Applying technology design approaches to design technology research3
How engaged scholarship is helping combat the wildfire crisis3
Workplace learning and the future of work3
Economic inequality drives longer work hours3
The future of work and learning hinges on social and relational processes3
Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations3
Academic freedom under siege: How state legislatures are reshaping higher education3
Strategic responses to anti-DEI legislation: The promise of culturally responsive assessments3
In analyses of the gender pay gap, job analysis, and O*NET don’t get a lot of respect, but they should3
Cybervetting is the latest symptom of a deeper problem – ERRATUM3
Finding balance: Silence and nature in employee restoration3
Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees3
How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion?3
Making the invisible visible: Recrafting the discourse surrounding women caregivers in academia3
What does online I-O education really need? Perspectives of online program affiliates3
Gender differences in tenure-track faculty time spent on childcare3
Becoming and acting as an ally against weight-based discrimination3
Parental leave is just a wolf in sheep’s clothing: A call for gender-aware policies in academia3
Misaligned incentives undermine the promise of engaged scholarship3
Body-worn camera technologies can promote positive policing3
The impacts of further abortion restrictions on work: The role of I-O psychology2
From antiwork to disorganizational psychology2
Best practices, pro bono: Volunteering for early career I-O psychologists2
Is it also time to revisit situational specificity?2
The role of work psychologists in the development of antiwork sentiments2
The scientist–practitioner gap: A call to end the debate2
AI monopoly and why it backfires on talent management2
Bringing our humanness to the workplace: Fostering reflection and reflexivity via mindful relating2
Counteracting threats to DEI with good trouble and innovation2
Enhancing graduate student education through meaningful volunteer efforts2
An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research2
Moving the boundaries of I-O, or of work itself?2
Better together: It’s time to unify, centralize, and market our competitive advantage2
Bringing polycultural organizations to life: A network analytic strategy2
Acknowledging the ramifications of weight-based stereotype threat in the workplace2
Alter your approach: Implement strategic interventions with a proven track record until DEI backlash subsides2
Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance2
Advancing ethical decision making in industrial-organizational psychology2
The right time, the right place: Collectively aligning I-O research with small business needs2
“Helping us by helping you”: Pro bono consulting and graduate student training2
Avatar: The new employee? Creating online employment personas may benefit stigmatized employees2
Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations1
Defining who is a worker: Why I-O psychology should extend consideration to nonhuman animals that labor for humans1
Contextualizing cases for neuroatypical inclusion in the workplace1
Industrial-organizational psychologists and volunteer work1
Person-centered learning: The future is here and it’s not pretty, but it can be1
A central decision in online course design: To go synchronous or asynchronous?1
The biopsychosocial model and neurodiversity: A person-centered approach1
Supporting women during motherhood and caregiving necessary, but not sufficient: The need for men to become equal partners in childcare1
Reflection in I-O psychology: Herding sheep1
On the undervaluing of diversity in the validity–diversity tradeoff consideration1
IOP volume 16 issue 1 Cover and Front matter1
Holding cybervetting to the same standards as traditional vetting methods1
Whose interests should technology serve? Employees versus shareholders1
Earning our place: How we can use interdisciplinary collaborations to move forward with sustainable development goals1
Adding competency models to the pay equity toolbox1
Job analysis and job classification for addressing pay inequality in organizations: Adjusting our methods within a shifting legal landscape1
What makes jobs too dissimilar to compare in a pay equity analysis?1
Strengthening the foundation: Extending beyond moral framing to overcome DEI backlash1
“Can’t you see I’m burned out!”: An exploration of potential downsides of volunteering1
The business of cybervetting1
For the public, it might be an evidence-based practice not to listen to I-O psychologists1
Decolonizing intervention assessment: Qualitative and interdisciplinary approaches to understanding “side effects”1
Polyculturalism as a multilevel phenomenon1
One opportunity of antiwork: Bringing unions (back) to the I-O table1
Return-to-office mandates and workplace inequality: Implications for industrial-organizational psychology1
Is cybervetting valuable?1
It all begins when you are a graduate student1
IOP volume 15 issue 3 Cover and Back matter1
Avoiding harm, benefits of interpersonal listening, and social equilibrium adjustment: An applied psychology approach to side effects of organizational interventions1
It takes more than meta-analysis to kill cognitive ability1
Maternal wall biases and the maybe baby effect1
Defunding is refunding: Community investments, not policing, create safety1
Yes, and…: Taming the wicked problem and navigating the empathy–efficiency paradox1
Entrepreneurship: an extension to anti-work perspectives1
Strengthening the link between I-O psychology and the SDGs: Providing support for the next generation1
Learning in the flow of work: Designing person-centric learning experiences with just-in-time microlearning1
Polyculturalism research should develop further before recommending organizational implementation strategies1
Ageism in disguise: How lifelong learning demands may marginalize older workers1
Instilling ethics in I-O: The responsibility of graduate training programs1
The price of technology is responsibility: A discussion of threats created by cybervetting that employers must address to ensure equal employment opportunity1
A panel discussion on addressing the science–practice gap with academic–industry collaborations1
Climate change as a catalyst for economic inequality: The failure of workplace learning in the global south1
Identifying I-O and HRM practices is necessary but not sufficient for lasting change1
Extending the ethical decision-making framework: Introducing the complexities and nuances of diversity and inclusion1
The Institute for Smarter Work doesn’t exist—but it could1
Balancing work, well-being, and psychological needs in a technological society1
Assessment centers: Reflections, developments, and empirical insights1
We need to find out where small businesses find information first1
Conceptualizing neurodiversity as individual differences in self-regulation1
Navigating uncertainty: Challenges and solutions for person-centered workplace learning in a rapidly changing world1
Antiwork highlights the need for humanism in I-O psychology1
Working standard hours, but at what cost? How the 40-hour work week disproportionately impacts minoritized employees1
Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations1
Do selection tests “really” work better than we think they do?1
A trauma-informed approach is needed to reduce police misconduct1
Online graduate programs: Better equity for industrial-organizational psychologists among disadvantaged groups1
Signaling a new mindset: Let’s swap SIOP for SWOP?1
Bridgers overlooked1
Putting the APA code to practice and developing a moral awareness1
Practicality of job analysis in today’s world of work1
Learning from research on training and organizational performance how to do I-O research with an organizational mindset1
Ethical decision making in the 21stcentury: A useful framework for industrial-organizational psychologists1
Counteracting the threats to DEI: The answer is accountability1
Beneficial role of mindfulness interventions in reducing weight stigma1
Going upstream: Recommendations for training the next generation of I-O influencers1
Bringing I-O psychology to the (re)public1
Organizational success: The importance of conceptual clarity1
Organizational outcomes: It’s not (only) a levels issue1
Finding “work” in grand challenges: Lessons from extremism research and a call to action1
We can be more, but first, who are we?0
Employee response to employer-sponsored direct primary care0
Organizational performance and the maturity of workforce practices0
A brighter vision of the potential of open science for benefiting practice: A ManyOrgs proposal0
The bright and dark side of I-O psychologists and volunteer work0
An expanding organizational mindset benefits all I-O psychologists0
Moving boundaries on what I-O has been, and what I-O can be: The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as an organizing framework0
We should also aim higher: I-O psychology applied to sustainable growth and development0
Implications of Keynes’ prediction for low-wage workers0
A multilevel approach for advancing organizational interventions0
Perfect is the enemy of good enough: Putting the side effects of intelligence testing in perspective0
The paradox of research novelty: Balancing innovation with practical impact in industrial and organizational psychology0
Gender roles in Keynes’ predictions: Progress or stagnation?0
Does the antiwork perspective contribute to understanding and improving the nature of work?0
The socio-ecological model: A multifaced approach for I-O psychologists to design interventions targeted at reducing police violence0
Faculty unions as a fourth actor: Two paths to supporting female professors in academia0
Challenging assumptions in research and practice using problematization principles0
Hocus-pocus and hydraulics functions: Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well0
Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research0
Examining personality testing in selection for neurodiverse individuals0
Minding employee pay equality policy perceptions0
Working against the current: What different groups can teach us about antiwork0
The beginning of the end for equal employment opportunity? What the repeal of EO 11246 means for organizations0
Facilitating timelier research with a novel classification of workplace technology0
All we like sheep: The need for reflection and reflexivity in I-O psychology0
Enhancing the relevance and practicality of I-O psychology for small businesses through organizational-based participatory research0
Work is dead, long live work: I-O’s role in redefining a postwork society0
Polyculturalism: Diversity incognito or diversity made irrelevant?0
Metrics for assessing similarity of jobs0
Turbulent times, targeted insights: I-O psychology’s response to policy shifts0
Evaluating online I-O graduate programs: An information-seeking guide for prospective students0
Organization-based participatory research: A framework to guide intervention research in I-O psychology0
Organizational differences in personnel selection: Learning from and moving beyond strategic human resource management research0
Best practices for weight at work research0
Open systems, closed interventions? A way forward requires systems thinking0
Operational validity/correlation coefficients are still valid for evaluating selection procedure effectiveness0
The devil you know versus the devil you don’t: Disclosure versus masking in the workplace0
Beyond rating accuracy: Unpacking frame-of-reference assessor training effectiveness0
A need to “veto” the “vett” in cybervetting to prevent DEI efforts from DIEing0
Perceptions of assessment center exercises: Between exercises differences and interventions0
Decoding variance and predictive ability in selection systems: An application of Gauthier’s framework of rater cognitions0
Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic: What are practitioners to do?0
Contextualizing the organizational mindset0
Enhancing engagement in workplace belonging efforts: Why moral processes matter0
Bridging from I-O to small business owners: Entrepreneurship as an allied discipline0
On putting the horse (raters and criteria) before the cart (variance components in ratings)0
Science communication: Eight perils, but one pearl to make it all worth it0
Scarcity as a motive of work0
Developmental reviewing: Is it really good for science?0
Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years0
Using the resources we have for community outreach: A community engagement assignment for graduate and undergraduate I-O students0
Expanding the I-O psychology mindset to organizational success0
Self-regulated learning: A person-centric approach to training0
If sex discrimination in pay is still a societal problem, job evaluation is the answer0
Is open science rewarding A while hoping for B?0
Estranged, nauseated, or fulfilled? Existentialism as bridge between antiwork and I-O psychology0
Career days: Dipping your toe in I-O volunteerism0
Reflections on creating and maintaining supportive graduate program culture online: Lessons learned from a top-ranked doctoral program0
Beyond the business case: Universally designing the workplace for neurodiversity and inclusion0
Human me-sources or human we-sources? Exploring the capacity for human resource practices to stimulate or suppress leader narcissism0
E Pluribus Unum? Why criteria should be multimethod and multirater0
IOP volume 15 issue 4 Cover and Back matter0
Experience, empathy, and emotions: What our academic systems need to support (not just) women professors0
The power of flexibility0
Neurodiversity in the workplace: Considering neuroatypicality as a form of diversity0
Going beyond a validity focus to accommodate megatrends in selection system design0
Cutting the cord: Good riddance to ineffective DEI programs0
The AI revolution and the future of work hours: Reevaluating Keynes’ prediction0
Interpreting validity evidence: It is time to end the horse race0
The science of job (in)security: Industrial-organizational psychology insights on reshaping the federal workforce using Schedule F (Policy/Career)0
Open science and epistemic pluralism: A tale of many perils and some opportunities0
Reflection and reflexivity in I-O psychology: A graduate student’s perspective0
Sound sensitivities in the “quiet” environment: Implications and strategies for management0
Microaffirmations: Strategic acts that disrupt inequality0
Investigating the promise and pitfalls of pulse surveys0
Rumors of general mental ability’s demise are the next red herring0
Same as it ever was: A clarification on the sources of predictable variance in job performance ratings0
Ageism in disguise: How lifelong learning demands may marginalize older workers – CORRIGENDUM0
Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors0
Policy and prejudice: The impact of Trump-era executive orders on transgender employees0
IOP volume 15 issue 1 Cover and Back matter0
IOP volume 15 issue 2 Cover and Front matter0
Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology0
Minors at work: The impact of education and labor policy changes on industrial-organizational psychology0
Neurodiversity and talent measurement: Revisiting the basics0
IOP volume 15 issue 1 Cover and Front matter0
Drawing on attributional augmenting to unlock the potential of cybervetting to combat gender discrimination in hiring0
Racialized police violence: Potential solutions from and for Germany0
Concrete steps for bridging the scholar–practitioner divide0
Investigating the dark side of personality: A case for derailer assessment in police0
Openness maximizes advocacy0
0.17934703826904