OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 500 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2019-09-01 to 2023-09-01.)

Article	Citations
Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care – A critical view and call for updates and research	58
Attitudes, skills, and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional survey of Swedish osteopaths	17
Interoception, mindfulness and touch: A meta-review of functional MRI studies	16
Finding a way between osteopathic principles and evidence-based practices: Response to Esteves et al.	16
Professional identity in the evolution of osteopathic models: Response to Esteves et al.	15
Person-centred care and traditional philosophies in the evolution of osteopathic models and theoretical frameworks: Response to Esteves et al.	14
“Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care – A critical view and call for updates and research”	13
W(h)ither osteopathy: A call for reflection; a call for submissions for a special issue	12
Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care – A critical view from a nonregulated country	10
Response to: Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care - A critical view and call for updates and research	10
“I do it my way” - Italian osteopaths’ beliefs and attitudes about five osteopathic models: A qualitative study	9
The legacy and implications of the body-mind-spirit osteopathic tenet: A discussion paper evaluating its clinical relevance in contemporary osteopathic care	9
‘Tell me your story’ - How osteopaths apply the BPS model when managing low back pain - A qualitative study	9
Osteopathy: Italian professional profile. A professional commentary by a group of experts of the European community of practice	9
Biomedical origins of the term 'osteopathic lesion' and its impact on people in pain	9
Stress axis and osteopathy: A dual hormone approach	8
An international profile of the practice of osteopaths: A systematic review of surveys	8
Beliefs about chronic low back pain amongst osteopaths registered in Spain: A cross-sectional survey	8
The development and exploratory analysis of the Osteopaths’ Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ)	7
Pre-professional reflective practice: Strategies, perspectives and experiences	7
What do UK osteopaths view as the safest lifting posture, and how are these views influenced by their back pain beliefs?	7
Epidemiology, common diagnoses, treatments and prognosis of shoulder pain: A narrative review	7
The Native American heritage of the body-mind-spirit paradigm in osteopathic principles and practices	7
A piece of the puzzle: Response to Esteves et al	6
Developing a psychologically-informed pain management course for use in osteopathic practice: The OsteoMAP cohort study	6

Perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among osteopathic medical students (OMS)	6
The validity of lumbo-pelvic landmark palpation by manual practitioners: A systematic review	5
Engaging with evidence-based practice in the osteopathy clinical learning environment: A mixed methods pilot study	5
Continuing debates about models of practice	5
‘Don't focus on the finger, look at the moon’ - The importance of contextual factors for clinical practice and research	5
Influence of the phrenic nerve in shoulder pain: A systematic review	5
“Understanding patients' narratives” A qualitative study of osteopathic educators’ opinions about using Medical Humanities poetry in undergraduate education	5
Is visceral manipulation beneficial for patients with low back pain? A systematic review of the literature	5
Reflective practice enhances osteopathic clinical reasoning	5
The Portuguese osteopaths' attitudes towards a biomechanical or biopsychosocial model in the approach of chronic low back pain – A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey	4
4 M's to make sense of evidence – Avoiding the propagation of mistakes, misinterpretation, misrepresentation and misinformation	4
The Portuguese Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA): A cross-sectional survey	4
Professional identity in osteopathy: A scoping review of peer-reviewed primary osteopathic research	4
Overcoming placebo-related challenges in manual therapy trials: The ‘whats and hows’ and the ‘touch equality assumption’ proposals	4
Inclusivity and accessibility in undergraduate osteopathic education for students with disability: A scoping review	4
Evocations of Osteopathy's founder and questions for contemporary osteopathic professional identity: A thematic analysis	4
Reconceptualizing the therapeutic alliance in osteopathic practice: Integrating insights from phenomenology, psychology and enactive inference	4
Barriers and facilitators experienced by osteopaths in implementing a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain – A mixed methods systematic review protoco	4
“Who am I to disagree?” A qualitative study of how patients interpret the consent process prior to manual therapy of the cervical spine	3
Osteopathic ableism: A critical disability view of traditional osteopathic theory in modern practice	3
Opposing vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic - A critical commentary and united statement of an international osteopathic research community	3
A guide to writing a case report of an osteopathic patient	3
How does French initial osteopathic training value relational competency, patient education, and the competency-based approach? A cross-sectional survey	3
Relevance of historical osteopathic principles and practices in contemporary care: Another perspective from traditional/complementary and alternative medicine	3