Episteme-A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Episteme-A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
Affective Reason31
Can privacy be diminished by falsehoods?26
EPI volume 21 issue 2 Cover and Front matter21
A Reliabilism without Counterexamples and Reference Class Problems14
The misplaced, if not erroneous, nature of many obligation attributions13
Epistemic Democracy: Making Pluralism Productive12
An Epistemic Account of Populism11
Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Conditionality Problem for Externalism11
Cults, Conspiracies, and Fantasies of Knowledge10
Simulation & Manipulation: What Skepticism (Or Its Modern Variation) Teaches Us About Free Will10
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge9
Indigenous Epistemologies of North America9
Ought to believe, simpliciter9
Rumination and Wronging: The Role of Attention in Epistemic Morality8
Contextualism and the truth norm8
Normativity in cases of Epistemic Indifference8
Decolonial Epistemic Authority Reparations6
Speaking Sense: A Hybrid Source of Justification for Self-Knowledge6
From Belief Polarization to Echo Chambers: A Rationalizing Account6
Against Epistemic Harm5
Conformism, Ignorance & Injustice: AI as a Tool of Epistemic Oppression5
Dogmatism and Domination: A Simulation Study5
A Practice-based Account of The Truth Norm of Belief4
Deep Agreements4
Why the marketplace of ideas needs more markets4
Toxic Positivity and Epistemic Injustice4
Information Hazards as Activity and Content: A Grounded Account of Dis/Misinformation4
Suspension in Inquiry4
Appreciative Silencing in Communicative Exchange4
Group Lies and the Narrative Constraint3
No Virtuous Insulation: A Dilemma for Veritism3
The Value of Risk in Transformative Experience3
Engaging Epistemically with the Other: Toward a More Dialogical and Plural Understanding of the Remedy for Testimonial Injustice3
Topic-sensitivity and the hyperintensionality of knowledge3
EPI volume 18 issue 3 Cover and Front matter3
Justification: Insights from Corpora3
Hume's Social Epistemology and the Dialogue Form3
Luck and normative achievements: Let not safety be our guide3
Conservative Treatment of Evidence3
Doppelgänger Changes the Game3
The Hard Problem of Access for Epistemological Disjunctivism3
EPI volume 21 issue 1 Cover and Front matter3
Against Evidential Minimalism: Reply to Hofmann3
Deferring to Expertise whilst Maintaining Autonomy2
Cognitive Peerhood, Epistemic Disdain, and Affective Polarisation: The Perils of Disagreeing Deeply2
Sexist Beliefs in a Sexist World: Exploring the Causal Role of Sexism in Sexist Beliefs2
A New Argument for Uniqueness about Evidential Support2
Strong Belief is Ordinary2
EPI volume 19 issue 2 Cover and Back matter2
Existential Bias2
The Stakes Effect: New Evidence from a Retraction-Based Experimental Design2
Intellectual Humility Without Open-Mindedness: How to Respond to Extremist Views2
Gratitude and the web of knowledge2
Fear Generalization and Mnemonic Injustice2
Bullshit in Politics Pays2
EPI volume 19 issue 1 Cover and Back matter2
Presentational and phenomenal forces of perception2
Virtuous Belief Outsourcing2
Inquiring for yourself for others2
Whose Hermeneutical Marginalization?2
Political liberalism’s skeptical problem and the burden of total experience2
It’s not just the Web, It’s the Spider as well: Prioritising Education over Structural Changes2
Can Arbitrary Beliefs be Rational?2
EPI volume 19 issue 4 Cover and Front matter1
Ability, Knowledge, and Non-paradigmatic Testimony1
The Myth of the Good Epistemic Bubble1
Citation Metrics: A Philosophy of Science Perspective1
Explosion and Reasoning1
Socializing Virtue Epistemology1
EPI volume 19 issue 3 Cover and Back matter1
Science communication in non-ideal contexts1
Coherence as Competence1
The Methodologically Flawed Discussion about Deep Disagreement1
Problems with Publishing Philosophical Claims We Don't Believe1
EPI volume 18 issue 3 Cover and Back matter1
Are There Counterexamples to the Consistency Principle?1
Action Guidance and Educating for Intellectual Virtue: A Response to Kotzee, Carter, and Siegel1
Implications for the Testimonial Reductionism/Anti-Reductionism Debate from Psychological Studies of Selective Trust: Scope and Limitations1
EPI volume 20 issue 1 Cover and Front matter1
There is no fresh air: A problem with the concept of echo chambers1
Statistical Evidence and the Problem of Specification1
Why Think for Yourself?1
The Power of Knowledge1
Testimonial Compression1
Curious to Know1
Poetic Injustice1
Evidentialism, Judgment, and Suspension: Meeting Sosa's Challenges1
“Dogmatism” and Dogmatism1
Jeffrey Conditionalization and Value Changes1
Misleading Higher-Order Evidence and Rationality: We Can't Always Rationally Believe What We Have Evidence to Believe1
How Should your Beliefs Change When your Awareness Grows?1
What’s Going On? Disinformation, Understanding, and Ignorance1
Idealization in Moral Understanding: Grasping Less but Acting Better1
The epistemic dangers of journalistic balance1
The Pedagogy of a Classroom for Intellectual Virtues1
Manufacturing the Illusion of Epistemic Trustworthiness1
Deep Disagreement, Epistemic Norms, and Epistemic Self-trust1
Education, A Thin Concept with A Thick Skin: What Do Supervillains and Antiheroes Teach Us About Virtuous Action-Guidedness?1
The scope of moral disagreement and the conciliationist case for moral skepticism1
EPI volume 20 issue 3 Cover and Front matter1
Seek the Joints! Avoid the Gruesome! Fidelity as an Epistemic Value1
An Epistemic Augmentation to the Math-First Approach to Physical Theories1
Can You Keep a Secret? BS Conspiracy Theories and the Argument from Loose Lips1
Why are Epistemic Reasons Normative?1
Building Epistemically Healthier Platforms1
Epistemic Complicity1
Unspecific Evidence and Normative Theories of Decision1
Luck and Reasons1
Arguing in the Face of Disagreement: Is It Worth It?1
Can Rational Reflection Save Moral Knowledge from Debunking?1
Rape Myths, Catastrophe, and Credibility1
Echo Chambers and Friendship1
Rigidity and factivity1
0.12168097496033