Episteme-A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology

Papers
(The TQCC of Episteme-A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Demarginalizing Standpoint Epistemology21
Epistemic vice predicts acceptance of Covid-19 misinformation18
Are Epistemic Norms Fundamentally Social Norms?12
Understanding, Idealization, and Explainable AI9
Post-truth Politics and Collective Gaslighting9
Is Conspiracy Theorizing Really Epistemically Problematic?8
Knowledge is Believing Something Because It's True8
Assertions, Handicaps, and Social Norms8
Why Think for Yourself?7
The Paradox of Empathy7
From Belief Polarization to Echo Chambers: A Rationalizing Account7
Group Knowledge and Mathematical Collaboration: A Philosophical Examination of the Classification of Finite Simple Groups7
Rumination and Wronging: The Role of Attention in Epistemic Morality5
Moral Encroachment, Wokeness, and the Epistemology of Holding5
Why Double-Check?5
Echo Chambers and Audio Signal Processing5
Group Epistemology and Structural Factors in Online Group Polarization5
Normative Principles are Synthetic A Priori5
Truth: The Rule or the Aim of Assertion?5
Testimonial Smothering and Domestic Violence Disclosure in Clinical Contexts5
Epistemic Dependence and Oppression: A Telling Relationship4
The Case for Modelled Democracy4
An Interactionist Approach to Cognitive Debiasing4
Prejudice in Testimonial Justification: A Hinge Account4
The Ontogenetic Foundations of Epistemic Norms4
Speak No Evil: Understanding Hermeneutical (In)justice4
Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Value of Presence3
Bullshit in Politics Pays3
Cults, Conspiracies, and Fantasies of Knowledge3
Rape Myths, Catastrophe, and Credibility3
An Interpretation of Weights in Linear Opinion Pooling3
Coherence as Competence3
Suspending Judgment is Something You Do3
Do Conspiracies Tend to Fail? Philosophical Reflections on a Poorly Supported Academic Meme3
Epistemic Self-Trust: It's Personal3
Deep Disagreement, Hinge Commitments, and Intellectual Humility3
The Importance of Forgetting3
Deception-Based Hermeneutical Injustice3
The Bias Paradox: Are Standpoint Epistemologies Self-contradictory?3
Scientific Progress and Collective Attitudes3
Finding the Epistocrats3
Defending Joint Acceptance Accounts of Justification3
Rethinking the Value of Author Contribution Statements in Light of How Research Teams Respond to Retractions3
On the Foundations of the Problem of Free Will3
Are There Any Epistemic Consequentialists?2
Appreciative Silencing in Communicative Exchange2
The Paradox of Graded Justification2
Toward a Lockean Unification of Formal and Traditional Epistemology2
Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories: A Novel Demarcation Problem2
Why No True Reliabilist Should Endorse Reliabilism2
Affective Reason2
How Racial Injustice Undermines News Sources and News-Based Inferences2
Pedagogical Virtues: An Account of the Intellectual Virtues of a Teacher2
Against Evidential Minimalism2
Further Insights on Fake-Barn Cases and Intuition Variation2
Objectivity as Independence2
How to Play the Lottery Safely?2
The Problem of Unwelcome Epistemic Company2
Group Lies and the Narrative Constraint2
Curious to Know2
Problems with Publishing Philosophical Claims We Don't Believe2
In Defence of Non-Ideal Political Deference2
Appraising the Epistemic Performance of Social Systems: The Case of Think Tank Evaluations2
Good Learning and Epistemic Transformation2
A Note on the Epistemological Value of Pretense Imagination2
First-Class and Coach-Class Knowledge2
0.020387172698975