Intercultural Pragmatics

Papers
(The TQCC of Intercultural Pragmatics is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
“So you know ehn … ” The use of bilingual interjections in Nigerian English14
Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian14
Humor in intercultural interaction: A source for misunderstanding or a common ground builder? A multimodal analysis13
Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent12
Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews10
On commitment to untruthful implicatures9
Cross-cultural interpretation of filmic metaphors: A think-aloud experiment9
Cognitive metaphor theories in translation studies: Toward a dual-model parametric approach8
Lying vs. misleading: The adverbial account8
Person- versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: a cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns8
Language and dialogue in philosophy and science7
How can metaphors communicate arguments?7
Common ground and positioning in teacher-student interactions: Second language socialization in EFL classrooms7
A cross-linguistic study of metacommunication in online hotel reviews7
Redefining pragmatic competence among modular interactions and beyond7
Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: a contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings7
Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotion clips: Metonymies and metaphors7
Dynamic assessment and requesting: Assessing the development of Japanese EFL learners’ oral requesting performance interactively7
The cognitive saliency of word associations of verbs of speech in English as a Lingua Franca interactions6
Linguistics and communication6
“Hey BCC this is Australia and we speak and read English:” Monolingualism and othering in relation to linguistic diversity6
Metaphorical creativity contributing to multimodal impoliteness in political cartoons6
Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account6
Do you kiss when you text? Cross-cultural differences in the use of the kissing emojis in three WhatsApp corpora6
Cognitive propositions and semantic expressions5
Disagreement and mitigation in power-asymmetrical venture capital reality TV shows: a comparative case study of Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China5
Social-pragmatic contextual comprehension in Italian preschool and school-aged children: a study using the Pragma test5
The case of question-based exclamatives: From pragmatic rhetorical function to semantic meaning4
“I would like to complain”: A study of the moves and strategies employed by Spanish EFL learners in formal complaint e-mails4
Borrowed Swahili discourse-pragmatic features in Kenyan and Tanzanian Englishes4
The status of conventional metaphorical meaning in the L2 lexicon4
Local grammars and intercultural speech act studies: A study of apologies in four English varieties4
The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse4
Cultural concept, movement, and way of life:jeitinhoin words and gestures3
Pragmatic impairment and COVID-193
The distance between illocution and perlocution: A tale of different pragmemes to call for social distancing in two cities3
Bullshit, trust, and evidence3
The distinction between semantics and pragmatics: The point of view of semiotics3
“We’re running out of fuel!”: When does miscommunication go unrepaired?3
The development of presupposition: Pre-schoolers’ understanding ofregretandtoo3
Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology3
Data collection methods applied in studies in the journalIntercultural Pragmatics(2004–2020): a scientometric survey and mixed corpus study3
Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers3
Illocutionary-act-type sensitivity and discursive sequence: An examination of quotation3
Populist discourse and active metaphors in the 2016 US presidential elections3
0.030979156494141