International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics

Papers
(The median citation count of International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes84
What goes around, comes around? Access and allocation problems in Global North–South waste trade40
From the circular economy to the sustainable development goals in the European Union: an empirical comparison35
China’s climate and energy policy: at a turning point?35
The Sustainable Development Goals viewed through Gross National Happiness, Ubuntu, and Buen Vivir30
Global warming problem faced by the international community: international legal aspect26
Future proofing the principle of no significant harm24
Green building in China21
Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals18
The global governance of water, energy, and food nexus: allocation and access for competing demands18
New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems16
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prospects of legal regulation in the field of electronic waste management in the context of a circular economy16
The inter-relationship between no harm, equitable and reasonable utilisation and cooperation under international water law15
Response of the Arab world to climate change challenges and the Paris agreement15
Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground14
Climate mitigation policies and actions: access and allocation issues14
Explicit targets and cooperation: regional fisheries management organizations and the sustainable development goals14
The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns12
The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: How far have we come?12
The “top-down” Kyoto Protocol? Exploring caricature and misrepresentation in literature on global climate change governance11
The United States: conditions for accelerating decarbonisation in a politically divided country11
The risk of carbon leakage in global climate agreements11
The effectiveness of soft law in international environmental regimes: participation and compliance in the Hyogo Framework for Action11
Institutional interplay in global environmental governance: lessons learned and future research10
Access and allocation in global biodiversity governance: a review9
Access and allocation in climate change adaptation9
The role of international regimes and courts in clarifying prevention of harm in freshwater and marine environmental protection8
Carbon emission, solid waste management, and electricity generation: a legal and empirical perspective for renewable energy in Nigeria8
Environmental education and awareness: the present and future key to the sustainable management of Ramsar convention sites in Kenya8
Lessons learnt in global biodiversity governance8
Reciprocity in practice: the hydropolitics of equitable and reasonable utilization in the Lancang-Mekong basin8
National political pressure groups and the stability of international environmental agreements7
The role of international case law in implementing the obligation not to cause significant harm7
Impact assessment of a mandatory operational goal-based short-term measure to reduce GHG emissions from ships: the LDC/SIDS case study7
Hybrid transnational advocacy networks in environmental protection: banning the use of cyanide in European gold mining7
Evolving together: transboundary water governance in the Colorado River Basin7
Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship7
Problems of the effectiveness of the implementation of international agreements in the field of waste management: the study of the experience of Kazakhstan in the context of the applicability of Europ7
Evaluating EU responsiveness to the evolution of the international regime complex on climate change7
John Rawls and compliance to climate change agreements: insights from a laboratory experiment7
The effectiveness of the Bern Convention on wildlife legislation and judicial decisions in Turkey6
Examining host-State counterclaims for environmental damage in investor-State dispute settlement from human rights and transnational public policy perspectives6
Domestic and international climate policies: complementarity or disparity?6
Lessons learnt from two decades of international environmental agreements: law6
Consensus decision-making in CCAMLR: Achilles’ heel or fundamental to its success?5
Achieving the ambitious targets of the Paris Agreement: the role of key actors5
The SDGs as integrating force in global governance? Challenges and opportunities5
The duty to take appropriate measures to prevent significant transboundary harm and private companies: insights from transboundary hydropower projects5
Access and allocation in food governance, a decadal view 2008–20185
Transforming our world? Discursive representation in the negotiations on the Sustainable Development Goals5
Limits to learning: the struggle to adapt to unintended effects of international payment for environmental services programmes5
The no significant harm principle and the human right to water5
Beyond delegation size: developing country negotiating capacity and NGO ‘support’ in international climate negotiations5
Prior notification of planned measures: A response to the no-harm dilemma?5
The principle of no significant harm in the Central Asian context5
Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning4
Access and allocation: rights to water, sanitation and hygiene4
Editorial Access and Allocation in Earth System Governance4
The principle of no significant harm in international water law4
An adaptation-mitigation game: does adaptation promote participation in international environmental agreements?4
The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA4
Determinants of successful delivery by non-state actors: an exploratory study4
The evolution and challenges in China’s implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity: a new analytical framework4
Population growth, family planning and the Paris Agreement: an assessment of the nationally determined contributions (NDCs)4
Europe’s nature governance revolution: harnessing the shadow of heterarchy3
Lessons learnt from international environmental agreements for the Stockholm + 50 Conference: celebrating 20 Years of INEA3
Multi-stakeholder partnerships for the SDGs: is the “next generation” fit for purpose?3
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Economic and legal regulation of the use and development of renewable energy sources3
From ‘mad cow’ crisis to synthetic biology: challenges to EU regulation of GMOs beyond the European context3
The sustainable development goals: governing by goals, targets and indicators3
Enhancing the achievement of the SDGs: lessons learned at the half-way point of the 2030 Agenda3
Achieving SDG 14 in an equitable and just way3
Agency dynamics of International Environmental Agreements: actors, contexts, and drivers3
Global climate governance: rising trend of translateral cooperation3
International aid, trade and investment and access and allocation3
Modelling and analysing the relationship between innovation and the European Regulations on hazardous waste shipments3
Protection of prior and late developers of transboundary water resources in international treaty practices: a review of 416 international water agreements3
Understanding international non-state and subnational actors for biodiversity and their possible contributions to the post-2020 CBD global biodiversity framework: insights from six international coope3
Not all risks are equal: a risk governance framework for assessing the water SDG3
20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward3
0.045506954193115