Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Stress response of police officers during COVID‐19: A moderated mediation model14
The relationship between trauma symptoms and immediate and delayed suggestibility in children who have been sexually abused12
An analysis of question style and type in official Finnish asylum interview transcripts9
The relationship of offending style to psychological and social risk factors in a sample of adolescent males7
Behavioural themes in Spanish missing persons cases: An empirical typology7
The relative impact of different ‘resistant behavioural responses’ on interrogative suggestibility in children: The powerful contribution of ‘direct explanation’ replies to unanswerable questions5
The application of Newton and Swoope's geographical profile to serial killers5
Characteristics of drug‐facilitated sexual assault in Spain4
Deception detection in repeated interviews: The effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts4
Examining witness interviewing environments4
A critical analysis of the Model Statement literature: Should this tool be used in practice?4
The effects of liking on informational elements in investigative interviews4
Dull versus creative liars—Who deceives better? Fantasy proneness and verifiability of genuine and fabricated accounts3
Multiple‐victim parricides in South Africa, 1990–20193
A new Geographic Profiling Suspect Mapping And Ranking Technique for crime investigations: GP‐SMART3
Stereotypical behavioural cues — but not their order — influence credibility judgements3
Observers' accuracy in detecting deception in non‐native speakers versus native speakers: A systematic review2
Fallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020)2
Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception2
A critical examination of Iacono and Ben‐Shakhar's critique of Ginton's innovative technique for estimating polygraph CQT accuracy in real‐life cases2
Investigative interviewing of high‐status fraud suspects2
Who lives, who dies, who decides: Differences between mass public shooters who survive, are killed, and commit suicide2
Behavioural profiles and offender characteristics: Typology based on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in homicide cases2
The effects of building and maintaining rapport on cooperative mock eyewitness recall2
Profiling homicide cases based on matched victim‐offender demographic characteristics2
UK and Spanish stranger sexual offenders crime scene behaviours and previous convictions: A cross‐cultural comparison2
0.016691923141479