Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Papers
(The H4-Index of Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research is 15. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-01-01 to 2024-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Burden and socioeconomics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy126
Translation and back-translation methodology in health research – a critique59
Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications42
An overview of the time trade-off method: concept, foundation, and the evaluation of distorting factors in putting a value on health39
Fixed dose drug combinations – are they pharmacoeconomically sound? Findings and implications especially for lower- and middle-income countries37
Real-world reduction in healthcare resource utilization following treatment of opioid use disorder with reSET-O, a novel prescription digital therapeutic34
Organizational measures aiming to combat COVID-19 in the Russian Federation: the first experience31
Distinguishing features in the assessment of mHealth apps29
Cost-effectiveness analyses of breast cancer medications use in developing countries: a systematic review27
Tools to assess the quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review24
Burden of disease and costs associated with type 2 diabetes in emerging and established markets: systematic review analyses23
First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from China22
Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease20
Will the Markov model and partitioned survival model lead to different results? A review of recent economic evidence of cancer treatments19
Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review16
0.029962062835693