OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Law Probability & Risk is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)

Article	Citations
How the work being done on statistical fingerprint models provides the basis for a much broader and greater impact affecting many areas within the criminal justice system	13
Evidence-based evaluations of criminal evidence—the role of evaluation structures for guilt determinations	13
Information economics in the criminal standard of proof	12
A plague on both your houses: The debate about how to deal with ‘inconclusive’ conclusions when calculating error rates	10
Chain event graphs for assessing activity-level propositions in forensic science in relation to drug traces on banknotes	7
Inconclusives in firearm error rate studies are not ‘a pass’	4
Odds ratios as a measure of disproportionate treatment: application to jury venires	2
Advancing the conversation on forensic inconclusives	2
From causality to liability: integrating Bayesian inference and PageRank logic in legal responsibility assessment	2
Towards cumulative forensic science: a commentary on ‘Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons’	1
Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons	1
Reconciling common-source, specific-source, feature-based, and score-based likelihood ratios	1
Presumed prior, contextual prior, and bizarre consequences—a reply to Ronald Meester and Lonneke Stevens	1
Signal detection theory fails to account for real-world consequences of inconclusive decisions	1
Bi-Gaussianized calibration of likelihood ratios	1
The epistemic value of novel predictive success in scientific and criminal investigations: a Bayesian explanation	0
A variance decomposition approach to inconclusives in forensic black box studies	0
Erratum for article “Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons” https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgae015	0
Comment on “A Variance Decomposition Approach to Inconclusives in Forensic Black Box Studies” by Amanda Luby and Joseph Kadane	0
Likelihood ratios for categorical count data with applications in digital forensics	0
Inconclusive conclusions in forensic science: rejoinders to Scurich, Morrison, Sinha and Gutierrez	0
A transparent method to determine limit values for Likelihood Ratio systems	0
Decisionalizing the problem of reliance on expert and machine evidence	0
Impact of new securities law in China: evidence of ownership difference in government regulation	0
Judges are trained as good explainers but maligned sentencers: a text similarity approach	0

Distinguishing exogenously and endogenously defined reliability from individual report accuracy in expert and machine evidence	0
A probabilistic graphical model for assessing equivocal evidence	0
Training legal fact-finders to recognize probabilistic fallacies	0
The influence of validation data on logical and scientific interpretations of forensic expert opinions	0
Perpetrator knowledge: a Bayesian account	0