Ethics and Information Technology

Papers
(The TQCC of Ethics and Information Technology is 12. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
An Ellulian analysis of propaganda in the context of generative AI306
AI responsibility gap: not new, inevitable, unproblematic91
ChatGPT is incredible (at being average)85
Correction: Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use62
Military robots should not look like a humans61
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering59
Gamification and the virtue of perspective48
Closing the responsibility gap: allocating responsibility according to prerequisite control and expectations for personal benefits47
Autonomous weapon systems impact on incidence of armed conflict: rejecting the ‘lower threshold for war argument’47
Navigating the social dilemma of autonomous systems: normative and applied arguments41
Why converging technologies need converging international regulation39
Disembodied friendship: virtual friends and the tendencies of technologically mediated friendship37
The Right to Break the Law? Perfect Enforcement of the Law Using Technology Impedes the Development of Legal Systems35
Correction: ChatGPT is bullshit34
Conceptualizing understanding in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): an abilities-based approach31
Responsible guidelines for authorship attribution tasks in NLP30
Life after privacy: reclaiming democracy in a surveillance society30
Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons29
Technology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust28
Engineering responsibility28
A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism27
Virtual reality and agential moral enhancement27
Contextual negation by moral opposition: rethinking the ethics of (Rape) simulations27
Legal and ethical implications of autonomous cyber capabilities: a call for retaining human control in cyberspace25
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-1925
The global diplomacy of governing military artificial intelligence24
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice24
Establishing human responsibility and accountability at early stages of the lifecycle for AI-based defence systems24
Design culture for Sustainable urban artificial intelligence: Bruno Latour and the search for a different AI urbanism22
Correction to: Ensuring the exercise of human agency in AI-based military systems: concerns across the lifecycle22
Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights22
Calibrating machine behavior: a challenge for AI alignment21
Of machines and men: Attributions of moral responsibility in AI-assisted warfare21
The irresponsibility of not using AI in the military20
Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’19
The need for and nature of a normative, cultural psychology of weaponized AI (artificial intelligence)18
Legitimacy and automated decisions: the moral limits of algocracy18
Algorithmic representation in virtual realities: ethical challenges and regulatory opportunities18
Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act17
Mechanic citizenship: Boston Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics and the constitution of digital citizens17
Reasons underdetermination in meaningful human control17
Should we speak of machine agency? A case against conceptual extension16
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning16
Autonomous Military Systems: collective responsibility and distributed burdens16
When work becomes a game: the moral costs of gamified labor16
AWS compliance with the ethical principle of proportionality: three possible solutions16
Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance16
Smart cities as a testbed for experimenting with humans? - Applying psychological ethical guidelines to smart city interventions16
A phenomenology and epistemology of large language models: transparency, trust, and trustworthiness15
Wide reflective equilibrium in LLM alignment: bridging moral epistemology and AI safety15
ChatGPT is bullshit15
Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: uniting or dividing urban experiences?15
The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context14
Negotiating becoming: a Nietzschean critique of large language models14
The rationality and morality of connecting quantum computers14
All ‘Dark patterns’ Are ‘Hostile patterns’: A Hostility Framework for Understanding Problematic Digital Interfaces13
Generative AI models should include detection mechanisms as a condition for public release13
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources13
Big data and the risk of misguided responsibilization13
A values-based approach to designing military autonomous systems13
Is moral status done with words?13
Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance: Considerations about private informational power and accountability12
What responsibility gaps are and what they should be12
Digital temperance: adapting an ancient virtue for a technological age12
Vicarious liability: a solution to a problem of AI responsibility?12
Correction: The repugnant resolution: has Coghlan & Cox resolved the Gamer’s Dilemma?12
Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility12
0.055539846420288