Ethics and Information Technology

Papers
(The median citation count of Ethics and Information Technology is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Military robots should not look like a humans89
An Ellulian analysis of propaganda in the context of generative AI79
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering72
AI responsibility gap: not new, inevitable, unproblematic51
Correction: Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use51
Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes49
Non-empirical problems in fair machine learning41
Disembodied friendship: virtual friends and the tendencies of technologically mediated friendship40
What is the ‘personal’ in ‘personal information’?40
Digitalization of contact tracing: balancing data privacy with public health benefit39
Conceptualizing understanding in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): an abilities-based approach38
Correction: ChatGPT is bullshit36
The Right to Break the Law? Perfect Enforcement of the Law Using Technology Impedes the Development of Legal Systems32
Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons31
Why converging technologies need converging international regulation31
Engineering responsibility29
Technology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust27
Responsible guidelines for authorship attribution tasks in NLP26
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-1925
Life after privacy: reclaiming democracy in a surveillance society24
A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism23
Deny, dismiss and downplay: developers’ attitudes towards risk and their role in risk creation in the field of healthcare-AI23
Legal and ethical implications of autonomous cyber capabilities: a call for retaining human control in cyberspace22
The irresponsibility of not using AI in the military20
Ethical responsibility and computational design: bespoke surgical tools as an instructive case study20
Calibrating machine behavior: a challenge for AI alignment20
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice20
Design culture for Sustainable urban artificial intelligence: Bruno Latour and the search for a different AI urbanism19
Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’19
Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights19
How can we know a self-driving car is safe?18
Mechanic citizenship: Boston Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics and the constitution of digital citizens18
The need for and nature of a normative, cultural psychology of weaponized AI (artificial intelligence)18
Psychological consequences of legal responsibility misattribution associated with automated vehicles17
Legitimacy and automated decisions: the moral limits of algocracy17
Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act15
The video gamer’s dilemmas14
Ethical implications of fairness interventions: what might be hidden behind engineering choices?14
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning14
Autonomous Military Systems: collective responsibility and distributed burdens14
AWS compliance with the ethical principle of proportionality: three possible solutions14
A phenomenology and epistemology of large language models: transparency, trust, and trustworthiness13
Smart cities as a testbed for experimenting with humans? - Applying psychological ethical guidelines to smart city interventions13
Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: a scoping review12
ChatGPT is bullshit12
Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: uniting or dividing urban experiences?12
Algorithmic decision-making employing profiling: will trade secrecy protection render the right to explanation toothless?11
Negotiating becoming: a Nietzschean critique of large language models11
Is moral status done with words?11
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources11
Big data and the risk of misguided responsibilization11
Rethinking explainability: toward a postphenomenology of black-box artificial intelligence in medicine10
The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context10
Can the predictive processing model of the mind ameliorate the value-alignment problem?10
Generative AI models should include detection mechanisms as a condition for public release10
A values-based approach to designing military autonomous systems9
Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility9
What responsibility gaps are and what they should be9
Correction: The repugnant resolution: has Coghlan & Cox resolved the Gamer’s Dilemma?9
Enforcing ethical goals over reinforcement-learning policies9
Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance: Considerations about private informational power and accountability9
Digital temperance: adapting an ancient virtue for a technological age9
Vicarious liability: a solution to a problem of AI responsibility?9
Cobots, “co-operation” and the replacement of human skill9
A Capability Approach to worker dignity under Algorithmic Management9
Cognitive warfare: an ethical analysis8
Explanation and Agency: exploring the normative-epistemic landscape of the “Right to Explanation”8
Deconstructing controversies to design a trustworthy AI future8
Ethics of sleep tracking: techno-ethical particularities of consumer-led sleep-tracking with a focus on medicalization, vulnerability, and relationality8
Autonomous weapon systems and responsibility gaps: a taxonomy8
Correction to: Weapons of moral construction? On the value of fairness in algorithmic decision-making7
Explainable AI in the military domain7
Tailoring responsible research and innovation to the translational context: the case of AI-supported exergaming7
Framing the Gamer’s Dilemma7
Ethics of generative AI and manipulation: a design-oriented research agenda7
Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?6
Design for values and conceptual engineering6
Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare6
Responsible reliance concerning development and use of AI in the military domain6
Can we solve the Gamer’s Dilemma by resisting it?6
A systematic review of almost three decades of value sensitive design (VSD): what happened to the technical investigations?6
Dirty data labeled dirt cheap: epistemic injustice in machine learning systems6
Does kindness towards robots lead to virtue? A reply to Sparrow’s asymmetry argument5
AI and the need for justification (to the patient)5
Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injustice5
Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI5
Empathy training through virtual reality: moral enhancement with the freedom to fall?5
Correction to: the Ethics of AI in Human Resources5
Conceptualizations of user autonomy within the normative evaluation of dark patterns5
Easy-read and large language models: on the ethical dimensions of LLM-based text simplification5
Mind the gap: bridging the divide between computer scientists and ethicists in shaping moral machines5
What is conceptual disruption?5
A moving target in AI-assisted decision-making: dataset shift, model updating, and the problem of update opacity5
Role of emotions in responsible military AI5
Between death and suffering: resolving the gamer’s dilemma5
Why a treaty on autonomous weapons is necessary and feasible5
Ethics framework for predictive clinical AI model updating5
Explanatory pragmatism: a context-sensitive framework for explainable medical AI5
Human digital twins unlocking Society 5.0? Approaches, emerging risks and disruptions5
Embracing grief in the age of deathbots: a temporary tool, not a permanent solution5
Transparency for AI systems: a value-based approach5
Ludic resistance: a new solution to the gamer’s paradox5
Moral autonomy of patients and legal barriers to a possible duty of health related data sharing4
Engineers on responsibility: feminist approaches to who’s responsible for ethical AI4
The value of responsibility gaps in algorithmic decision-making4
Getting it right: the limits of fine-tuning large language models4
The ethics of online steering4
Robots, institutional roles and joint action: some key ethical issues4
Socializing the political: rethinking filter bubbles and social media with Hannah Arendt4
Trust in medical artificial intelligence: a discretionary account4
The perfect technological storm: artificial intelligence and moral complacency4
Understanding responsibility in Responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context4
Violent video games: content, attitudes, and norms4
Dual-use implications of AI text generation4
Artificial intelligence and humanitarian obligations4
Military artificial intelligence as power: consideration for European Union actorness3
Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe3
Mapping the landscape of ethical considerations in explainable AI research3
Dating apps as tools for social engineering3
Technology and pronouns: disrupting the ‘Natural Attitude about Gender’3
Non-consensual personified sexbots: an intrinsic wrong3
Melting contestation: insurance fairness and machine learning3
Fiduciary requirements for virtual assistants3
Correction: Framing the Gamer’s Dilemma3
LLMs beyond the lab: the ethics and epistemics of real-world AI research3
A portrait of the artist as a young algorithm3
Cut the crap: a critical response to “ChatGPT is bullshit”3
Should we embrace “Big Sister”? Smart speakers as a means to combat intimate partner violence3
Ethical dilemmas are really important to potential adopters of autonomous vehicles3
The ethics of hacking. Ross W. Bellaby3
Algorithmic legitimacy in clinical decision-making3
Nullius in Explanans: an ethical risk assessment for explainable AI3
The gamer’s dilemma: an expressivist response3
The contested role of AI ethics boards in smart societies: a step towards improvement based on board composition by sortition3
Human achievement and artificial intelligence3
0.026100873947144