Health Expectations

Papers
(The TQCC of Health Expectations is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-10-01 to 2024-10-01.)
ArticleCitations
Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition‐specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues258
Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK165
Public preference for COVID‐19 vaccines in China: A discrete choice experiment110
Mapping definitions of co‐production and co‐design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future95
Public attitudes towards COVID‐19 contact tracing apps: A UK‐based focus group study85
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review62
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research61
The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient‐centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait‐listed patients and caregivers during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A scoping re57
Factors explaining the fear of being infected with COVID‐1957
'Reluctant pioneer': A qualitative study of doctors' experiences as patients with long COVID57
The ultimate question? Evaluating the use of Net Promoter Score in healthcare: A systematic review46
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review44
Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care42
Mediated roles of generalized trust and perceived social support in the effects of problematic social media use on mental health: A cross‐sectional study42
Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review41
Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid—A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community39
‘I don't know what to do or where to go’. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradfo36
How different health literacy dimensions influences health and well‐being among men and women: The mediating role of health behaviours36
Trust, medical expertise and humaneness: A qualitative study on people with cancer’ satisfaction with medical care33
Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety33
‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity?32
Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice32
Shortening and validation of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) for measuring meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement31
Participatory health research with migrants: Opportunities, challenges, and way forwards31
Determinants of patient activation and its association with cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease: A cross‐sectional study29
The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals29
Towards conceptual convergence: A systematic review of psychological resilience in family caregivers of persons living with chronic neurological conditions29
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty29
Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions27
Barriers and facilitators to hepatitis C screening and treatment for people with lived experience of homelessness: A mixed‐methods systematic review25
Involving an individual with lived‐experience in a co‐analysis of qualitative data25
More than a feeling? What does compassion in healthcare ‘look like’ to patients?25
Post‐discharge medicines management: the experiences, perceptions and roles of older people and their family carers24
Improving diversity in study participation: Patient perspectives on barriers, racial differences and the role of communities24
Patients' experiences of, and engagement with, remote home monitoring services for COVID‐19 patients: A rapid mixed‐methods study24
The experience of financial burden for people with multimorbidity: A systematic review of qualitative research23
Experience of patients hospitalized with COVID‐19: A qualitative study of a pandemic disease in Iran22
Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review21
Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience21
Acceptability of risk‐stratified population screening across cancer types: Qualitative interviews with the Australian public21
Adapting a codesign process with young people to prioritize outcomes for a systematic review of interventions to prevent self‐harm and suicide20
A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end‐of‐life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections20
An outbreak of appreciation: A discursive analysis of tweets of gratitude expressed to the National Health Service at the outset of the COVID‐19 pandemic20
Children's perspectives and experiences of the COVID‐19 pandemic and UK public health measures20
COVID‐19 lockdown consequences on body mass index and perceived fragility related to physical activity: A worldwide cohort study20
Patient partners’ perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient‐oriented rapid review20
Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co‐design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians20
Implementing culturally competent transplant care and implications for reducing health disparities: A prospective qualitative study20
Loss and recovery after concussion: Adolescent patients give voice to their concussion experience20
How do health services engage culturally and linguistically diverse consumers? An analysis of consumer engagement frameworks in Australia20
Applying the principles of adaptive leadership to person‐centred care for people with complex care needs: Considerations for care providers, patients, caregivers and organizations20
Evaluation of patient engagement in medicine development: A multi‐stakeholder framework with metrics20
Optimizing a digital intervention for managing blood pressure in stroke patients using a diverse sample: Integrating the person‐based approach and patient and public involvement19
Factors influencing oral health behaviours, access and delivery of dental care for autistic children and adolescents: A mixed‐methods systematic review19
Talking the same language on patient empowerment: Development and content validation of a taxonomy of self‐management interventions for chronic conditions18
Adolescent and young adult patients as co‐researchers: A scoping review18
Nothing about us without us: A co‐production strategy for communities, researchers and stakeholders to identify ways of improving health and reducing inequalities18
‘I hated being ghosted’ – The relevance of social participation for living well with post‐stroke aphasia: Qualitative interviews with working aged adults18
Improving primary health care quality for refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review of interventional approaches17
Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: Qualitative interviews17
Healthcare needs, experiences and treatment burden in primary care patients with multimorbidity: An evaluation of process of care from patients' perspectives17
Innovative methods for involving people with dementia and carers in the policymaking process17
Understanding multi‐stakeholder needs, preferences and expectations to define effective practices and processes of patient engagement in medicine development: A mixed‐methods study16
Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: Critical reflections15
Navigating dietary advice for multiple sclerosis15
‘It reshaped how I will do research’: A qualitative exploration of team members’ experiences with youth and family engagement in a randomized controlled trial15
Patients as team members: Factors affecting involvement in treatment decisions from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition15
Advance care directive prevalence among older Australians and associations with person‐level predictors and quality indicators15
How is patient‐centred care conceptualized in obstetrical health? comparison of themes from concept analyses in obstetrical health‐ and patient‐centred care15
Seeking a deeper understanding of ‘distributed health literacy’: A systematic review15
Sharing administrative health data with private industry: A report on two citizens' juries15
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study14
Experiences of self‐care during the COVID‐19 pandemic among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative study14
‘They're getting a taste of our world’: A qualitative study of people with multiple sclerosis' experiences of accessing health care during the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Australian Capital Territory14
Evaluating the effectiveness of the Family Connections program for caregivers of youth with mental health challenges, part I: A quantitative analysis14
Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study14
Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health‐care professionals: Co‐construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives14
‘Advocacy groups are the connectors’: Experiences and contributions of rare disease patient organization leaders in advanced neurotherapeutics14
Preference‐based patient participation for most, if not all: A cross‐sectional study of patient participation amongst persons with end‐stage kidney disease14
'A limpet on a ship': Spatio‐temporal dynamics of patient and public involvement in research14
Caring for a sick or injured child during the COVID‐19 pandemic lockdown in 2020 in the UK: An online survey of parents' experiences14
Research‐ and health‐related youth advisory groups in Canada: An environmental scan with stakeholder interviews14
“I would not go to him”: Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain14
Applying Patient and Public Involvement in preclinical research: A co‐created scoping review13
Patient participation during primary health‐care encounters among adult patients with multimorbidity: A cross‐sectional study13
Ethical issues in participatory arts methods for young people with adverse childhood experiences13
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model13
Reflections from the COVID‐19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research13
The impact of COVID‐19 on patient engagement in the health system: Results from a Pan‐Canadian survey of patient, family and caregiver partners13
Perceived barriers and facilitators to exercise in kidney transplant recipients: A qualitative study13
Doing involvement: A qualitative study exploring the ‘work’ of involvement enacted by older people and their carers during transition from hospital to home13
Tailored patient therapeutic educational interventions: A patient‐centred communication model13
Experiences of and attitudes to lifestyle modification for the management of multiple sclerosis: A qualitative analysis of free‐text survey data13
Conceptualisations of positive mental health and wellbeing among children and adolescents in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis13
Patient perspectives on quality of care for depression and anxiety in primary health care teams: A qualitative study13
Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews13
A qualitative evaluation of coproduction of research: ‘If you do it properly, you will get turbulence’13
Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed‐methods systematic review13
Improving the experience of older people with colorectal and breast cancer in patient‐centred cancer care pathways using experience‐based co‐design13
Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population‐based survey12
Power, recovery and doing something worthwhile: A thematic analysis of expert patient perspectives in psychiatry education12
A qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators affecting ethnic minority patient groups when accessing medicine review services: Perspectives of healthcare professionals12
Performance of Thailand’s universal health coverage scheme: Evaluating the effectiveness of annual public hearings12
Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self‐manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study12
Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: A coproduced eDelphi study12
The CORE study—An adapted mental health experience codesign intervention to improve psychosocial recovery for people with severe mental illness: A stepped wedge cluster randomized‐controlled trial12
What does safety in mental healthcare transitions mean for service users and other stakeholder groups: An open‐ended questionnaire study12
The use of arts‐based methodologies and methods with young people with complex psychosocial needs: A systematic narrative review12
A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening12
Assessing the experience of person‐centred coordinated care of people with chronic conditions in the Netherlands: Validation of the Dutch P3CEQ12
Can you see me? Participant experience of accessing a weight management programme via group videoconference to overcome barriers to engagement11
Online community engagement in response to COVID‐19 pandemic11
The involvement matrix as a framework for involving youth with severe communication disabilities in developing health education materials11
Diabetes care provided by national standards can improve patients' self‐management skills: A qualitative study of how people with type 2 diabetes perceive primary diabetes care11
The story vs the storyteller: Factors associated with the effectiveness of brief video‐recorded patient stories for promoting opioid tapering11
Knowledge sharing to support long‐term condition self‐management—Patient and health‐care professional perspectives11
Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences11
The Ecology of Engagement: Fostering cooperative efforts in health with patients and communities11
Giving an account of patients' experience: A qualitative study on the care process of hip and knee osteoarthritis11
‘I think I will need help’: A systematic review of who facilitates the recovery from gender‐based violence and how they do so11
Barriers and enabling factors in weight management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A qualitative study using the COM‐B model of behaviour11
Changes in public perceptions and experiences of the Australian health‐care system: A decade of change11
Humanizing harm: Using a restorative approach to heal and learn from adverse events11
A patient and public involvement workshop using visual art and priority setting to provide patients with a voice to describe quality and safety concerns: Vitamin B12 deficiency and pernicious anaemia11
Use of co‐design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review11
‘A lot of small things make a difference’. Mental health and strategies of coping during the COVID‐19 pandemic11
Participatory codesign of patient involvement in a Learning Health System: How can data‐driven care be patient‐driven care?11
Digital reminiscence app co‐created by people living with dementia and carers: Usability and eye gaze analysis10
Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy10
Experiences of cervical screening participation and non‐participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland10
In the works: Patient and public involvement and engagement in healthcare decision‐making10
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial10
Partnering with older people as peer researchers10
Patient and public involvement in care home research: Reflections on the how and why of involving patient and public involvement partners in qualitative data analysis and interpretation10
Stuff you think you can handle as a parent and stuff you can’t’. Understanding parental health‐seeking behaviour when accessing unscheduled care: A qualitative study10
‘It's not magic’: A qualitative analysis of geriatric physicians' explanations of cardio‐pulmonary resuscitation in hospital admissions10
The impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the SlowMo study: Reflections on peer innovation10
Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway10
The chronic disease Self‐Management Programme: A phenomenological study for empowering vulnerable patients with chronic diseases included in the EFFICHRONIC project10
An exercise intervention for people with serious mental illness: Findings from a qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation10
Ask us! Adjusting experience‐based codesign to be responsive to people with intellectual disabilities, serious mental illness or older persons receiving support with independent living9
Cross‐cultural validation of the patient‐practitioner orientation scale among primary care professionals in Spain9
Using social media for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research: The process and impact of a closed Facebook group9
Patients with low activation level report limited possibilities to participate in cancer care9
Understanding support systems for Parkinson's disease management in community settings: A cross‐national qualitative study9
Living with a genetic, undiagnosed or rare disease: A longitudinal journalling study through the COVID‐19 pandemic9
The Youth Patient and Public Involvement Café—A youth‐led model for meaningful involvement with children and young people9
Enhancing community weight loss groups in a low socioeconomic status area: Application of the COM‐B model and Behaviour Change Wheel9
Cocreation with Dutch patients of decision‐relevant information to support shared decision‐making about adjuvant treatment in breast cancer care9
The role of advocacy and empowerment in shaping service development for families raising children with developmental disabilities9
A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research9
‘Triadic’ shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany9
Transitional care for patients with acute stroke—A priority‐setting project9
More ‘milk’ than ‘psychology or tablets’: Mental health professionals’ perspectives on the value of peer support workers9
‘Corona is coming’: COVID‐19 vaccination perspectives and experiences amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse West Australians9
Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study9
Views about integrating smoking cessation treatment within psychological services for patients with common mental illness: A multi‐perspective qualitative study9
Barriers and facilitators to mobile health and active surveillance use among older adults with skin disease9
Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems9
Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision‐making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure–process–outcome model9
Co‐design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions9
Codesigning person‐centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study9
It takes three to tango: An ethnography of triadic involvement of residents, families and nurses in long‐term dementia care9
Providing culturally safe care to Indigenous people living with diabetes: Identifying barriers and enablers from different perspectives9
A mapping and synthesis of tools for stakeholder and community engagement in quality improvement initiatives for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health9
‘Lifts your spirits, lifts your mind’: A co‐produced mixed‐methods exploration of the benefits of green and blue spaces for mental wellbeing8
Rapid development of a COVID‐19 care planning decision‐aid for family carers of people living with dementia8
Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators8
Co‐ideation and co‐design in co‐creation research: Reflections from the ‘Co‐Creating Safe Spaces’ project8
Women's experiences along the ovarian cancer diagnostic pathway in Catalonia: A qualitative study8
Shared decision making in consultations for hypertension: Qualitative study in general practice8
Perceptions of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on pre‐operative education in China: A qualitative study8
What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor‐patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics?8
Proposals for person‐centred care in the COVID‐19 era. Delphi study8
‘Down to the person, the individual patient themselves’: A qualitative study of treatment decision‐making for shoulder pain8
Characteristics of the ideal healthcare services to meet adolescents' mental health needs: A qualitative study of adolescents' perspectives8
Patient and general practitioner experiences of implementing a medication review intervention in older people with multimorbidity: Process evaluation of the SPPiRE trial8
Delivery of supported self‐management in remote asthma reviews: A systematic rapid realist review8
Adolescents and young adults’ (AYA) views on their cancer knowledge prior to diagnosis: Findings from a qualitative study involving AYA receiving cancer care8
‘No‐one has listened to anything I’ve got to say before’: Co‐design with people who are sleeping rough8
‘I just thought that it was such an impossible thing’: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to discontinuing long‐term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists using the Theoretical Domains8
A qualitative study of nurse‐patient communication and information provision during surgical pre‐admission clinics8
Question prompt lists and endorsement of question‐asking support patients to get the information they seek—A longitudinal qualitative study8
Chronic and rare disease patients' access to healthcare services during a health crisis: The example of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Turkey8
Mapping the experiences of people with achalasia from initial symptoms to long‐term management8
Patient perspectives on primary care for multimorbidity: An integrative review8
Beyond the control of the care home: A meta‐ethnography of qualitative studies of Infection Prevention and Control in residential and nursing homes for older people8
Barriers to employment of Australian cancer survivors living with geographic or socio‐economic disadvantage: A qualitative study8
How paediatric departments in Sweden facilitate giving children a voice on their experiences of healthcare: A cross‐sectional study8
What's Up With Everyone? A qualitative study on young people's perceptions of cocreated online animations to promote mental health literacy8
Introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening: Development of an equity‐informed evidence‐based approach8
The Wellness Quest: A health literacy and self‐advocacy tool developed by youth for youth mental health8
Widening or narrowing inequalities? The equity implications of digital tools to support COVID‐19 contact tracing: A qualitative study8
Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research8
Adapting patient and public involvement in patient‐oriented methods research: Reflections in a Canadian setting during COVID‐198
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis8
Evaluating the role and effectiveness of co‐produced community‐based mental health interventions that aim to reduce suicide among adults: A systematic review8
Development and content validity of the Experienced Patient‐Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT)—A best practice example for generating patient‐reported measures from qualitative data8
The socioemotional challenges and consequences for caregivers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children with otitis media: A qualitative study8
‘They need to ask me first’. Community engagement with low‐income citizens. A realist qualitative case‐study8
The experiences of men following recurrent miscarriage in an Irish tertiary hospital: A qualitative analysis8
Sociocultural influences on asthma self‐management in a multicultural society: A qualitative study amongst Malaysian adults7
How might diabetes organisations address diabetes‐related stigma? Findings from a deliberative democratic case study7
User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings7
Factors influencing decisions people with motor neuron disease make about gastrostomy placement and ventilation: A qualitative evidence synthesis7
Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis7
The lived experiences of women exploring a healthy lifestyle, gestational weight gain and physical activity throughout pregnancy7
The effects of a mobile application for patient participation to improve patient safety7
Improving the depth of data quality or increasing confusion? Reflections on a data analysis involving members of a self‐help group for relatives of people living with dementia7
‘He or she maybe doesn't know there is such a thing as a review’: A qualitative investigation exploring barriers and facilitators to accessing medication reviews from the perspective of people from et7
The lived experience of a novel disruptive therapy in a group of men and boys with haemophilia A with inhibitors: Emi & Me7
Reporting the whole story: Analysis of the ‘out‐of‐scope’ questions from the James Lind Alliance Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Priority Setting Partnership Survey7
The development of a culturally sensitive educational video: How to facilitate informed decisions on cervical cancer screening among Turkish‐ and Moroccan‐Dutch women7
Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects7
Experiences, perceptions and expectations of health services amongst marginalized populations in urban Australia: A meta‐ethnographic review of the literature7
Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision‐making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients7
Social support services for dementia during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey exploring service adaptations in the United Kingdom7
‘What price do you put on your health?’: Medical cannabis, financial toxicity and patient perspectives on medication access in advanced cancer7
Epistemic justice in public involvement and engagement: Creating conditions for impact7
Engaging young people within a collaborative knowledge mobilization network: Development and evaluation7
Conducting public involvement in dementia research: The contribution of the European Working Group of People with Dementia to the ROADMAP project7
An intervention of sustainable weight change: Influence of self‐help group and expectations7
What adults with ADHD want to know: A Delphi consensus study on the psychoeducational needs of experts by experience7
Clinician perspectives on clinical decision support systems in lung cancer: Implications for shared decision‐making7
Outcomes of importance to children and young adults with cerebral palsy, their parents and health professionals following lower limb orthopaedic surgery: A qualitative study to inform a Core Outcome S7
Creative Long Covid: A qualitative exploration of the experience of Long Covid through the medium of creative narratives7
Reducing delayed transfer of care in older people: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shorter hospital stays7
Patients' experiences of behaviour change interventions delivered by general practitioners during routine consultations: A nationally representative survey7
Health‐care professionals’ assessment of a person‐centred intervention to empower self‐management and health across chronic illness: Qualitative findings from a process evaluation study7
Interactional practices in person‐centred care: Conversation analysis of nurse‐patient disagreement during self‐management support7
Exploring patient acceptability of a short‐stay care pathway in hospital post arthroplasty: A theory‐informed qualitative study7
Exploring a collaborative approach to the involvement of patients, carers and the public in the initial education and training of healthcare professionals: A qualitative study of patient experiences7
Reconsidering patient‐centred care: Authority, expertise and abandonment7
Perceptions of aquatic physiotherapy and health‐related quality of life among people with Parkinson’s disease7
Cultural adaptation of a community‐based advance serious illness planning decision aid to the Quebec context involving end‐users7
Using cocreated visually informed community mental health education in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A case study of youth substance misuse in Assam, India7
Patients' experiences across the trajectory of atrial fibrillation: A qualitative systematic review7
Family caregiver roles and challenges in assisting patients with cancer treatment decision‐making: Analysis of data from a national survey7
Experiences and expectations of receiving volunteer services among home‐based elderly in Chinese urban areas: A qualitative study7
“Whilst you are here…” Acceptability of providing advice about screening and early detection of other cancers as part of the breast cancer screening programme7
Tools to evaluate medication management for caregivers of people living with dementia: A systematic review7
Prioritizing Chinese medicine clinical research questions in cancer palliative care from patient and caregiver perspectives6
Priorities and preferences for care of people with multiple chronic conditions6
Awareness of diagnosis, treatment and risk of late effects in Chinese survivors of childhood cancer in Hong Kong6
Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial6
"Care is not care if it isn't person‐centred": A content analysis of how Person‐Centred Care is expressed on Twitter6
Reimagining consumer involvement: Resilient system indicators in the COVID‐19 pandemic response in New South Wales, Australia6
Towards an Implementation‐STakeholder Engagement Model (I‐STEM) for improving health and social care services6
Swallowing the pill of adverse effects: A qualitative study of patients' and pharmacists' experiences and decision‐making regarding the adverse effects of chronic pain medications6
Seeking or contributing? Evidence of knowledge sharing behaviours in promoting patients’ perceived value of online health communities6
0.099867105484009