International Journal of Evidence & Proof

Papers
(The median citation count of International Journal of Evidence & Proof is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Evidence, Risk, and Proof Paradoxes: Pessimism about the Epistemic Project9
Evidence, probability and relative plausibility8
Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions6
Evidence, probability, and relative plausibility: A response to Aitken, Taroni, and Bozza5
Likelihood ratios in psychological expert opinion, and their reception by professional judges4
Reported communication challenges for adult witnesses with intellectual disabilities giving evidence in court4
‘I am not beholden to anyone… I consider myself to be an officer of the court’: A comparison of the intermediary role in England and Wales and Northern Ireland4
Proving non-fatal strangulation in family violence cases: A case study on the criminalisation of family violence4
Handle with care: Jury deliberation and demeanour-based assessments of witness credibility3
Digital evidence in defence practice: Prevalence, challenges and expertise3
Civil liability and the 50%+ standard of proof3
A case study on shortage of evidence in wrongful convictions in China3
Victim legal representation and the adversarial criminal trial: A critical analysis of proposals for third-party counsel for complainants of serious sexual violence2
Zombie forensics: the use of the polygraph and the integrity of the criminal justice system in England and Wales2
The curious case of the jury-shaped hole: A plea for real jury research2
Special investigative measures: Comparison of the Serbian Criminal Procedure Code with the European Court of Human Rights Standards2
‘Show me what happened’: Low technology communication aids used in intermediary mediated police investigative interviews with vulnerable witnesses with an intellectual disability2
Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union2
Putting the ‘presumption’ back in the ‘presumption of innocence’2
To the exclusion of all others? DNA profile and transfer mechanics—R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021 (03 Aug 2020)2
Are all complainants of sexual assault vulnerable? Views of Australian criminal justice professionals on the evidence-sharing process2
Resuscitating criminal courts after Covid-19: Trialling a cure worse than the disease2
Private communication between lawyers as evidence in a judicial process: A comparative journey2
Intermediaries in Chile: Facilitating the right of child victims and witnesses to participate and be heard in criminal trials2
An epistemological analysis of the use of reputation as evidence1
Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability1
The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India1
Vulnerable witnesses in Chilean criminal proceedings: New developments1
Admissibility of confession evidence: Principles of hearsay and the rule of voluntariness1
The peculiarity of American evidence law: An outsider's observation and reflection1
DNA as ‘ready-made evidence’: An analysis of Portuguese judges’ views1
Preponderance, proportionality, stepwise liability1
Responding to the danger of wrongful conviction for historical sexual abuse: A case for resurrecting abuse of process for delay?1
Indigenous storytelling and admissibility in common law courts: Developing the protocols for the reception theory of evidence1
‘It's the judicial equivalent of robbing Peter to pay Paul’—The implementation gap in section 28 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 19991
Turning a graphical method of evidential reasoning into an operational tool for judges? Empirical evidence1
Re-thinking notions of evidence and proof for sentencing: Towards a more communitarian model0
Perspectives on the role of the intermediary in the justice system: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis0
Empowering jurors to ask questions about the expert evidence in criminal trials0
Reasoning from background knowledge: Evaluating and explaining behaviour in Finnish rape judgments0
A systematic account of probabilistic fallacies in legal fact-finding0
Witness Statements for Employment Tribunals in England and Wales: What are the ‘Issues’?0
Miscarriage of justice and expert evidence on the credibility of children's testimony: Some issues regarding its use in Chile and Spain0
Intercept evidence from foreign language communications: Reliability and minimum standards in the interests of justice0
Corrigendum to Making the case for ECRIS: Post-‘Brexit’ sharing of criminal records information between the European Union and United Kingdom0
Evidence from criminal law experts in Indonesian criminal trials: Usurping the judicial function?0
Search and seizure of electronic devices in India: time for a change?0
Getting people thinking and talking: An exploration of the Attorney General’s 2020 guidelines on disclosure0
Unpacking the exclusionary rule of repeated confessions in China0
Fight, flight, freeze…or lie? Rethinking the principles of res gestae evidence in light of its revival0
Parading the eyewitness: Caste atrocity and the Test Identification Parade0
Examining factors predicting sexual exploitation among victims of human trafficking0
Law enforcement investigation of non-sexual child abuse: Physical abuse, neglect and Abusive Head Trauma0
Book Review0
When you say nothing at all: Invoking inferences from suspect silence in the police station0
The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures: Three models compared0
Non-defendant bad character and s. 100 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: A socio-legal analysis of admissibility gateways and trial tactics0
The skewing effect of outcome evidence0
The exposition of rape in Cyprus: From the crime scene to the court room0
An Unforeseen Alliance: The Experience of Mental Health Professionals when Testifying in Sexual Assault Criminal Proceedings0
Evidentiary value and evidentiary status of blockchain evidence0
Evidence law and economics0
The standard of proof and crime prevention: A theoretical and empirical analysis0
The beyond a reasonable doubt standard of proof: Juror understanding and reform0
Combating the ‘myth of physical restraint’ in human trafficking and modern slavery trials heard in the Crown Court0
Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application0
The economic case for conviction multiplicity0
Proof of cryptoasset ownership in England and Wales0
The values of prediction in criminal cases0
Legal advice privilege: The legacy of Three Rivers (No. 5) and the challenge of providing consistent protection to all client types0
What matters for assessing insider witnesses? Results of an experimental vignette study0
Rethinking the relationship between reverse burdens and the presumption of innocence0
Similar fact evidence in contractual interpretation: Bhoomatidevi d/o Kishinchand Chugani Mrs Kavita Gope Mirwani v Nantakumar s/o v Ramachandra and another [2023] SGHC 370
The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand0
Psychiatric Evaluation in Chinese Criminal Proceedings:A Legal Perspective0
The research on an electronic evidence forensic system for cross-border cybercrime0
What do we know about ‘rape myth’ research and the claim that there is ‘overwhelming evidence’ that juries are prejudiced in rape trials?0
Here is a table: A prolegomenon to a future new evidence scholarship in Africa0
A missing piece in the debate about naked statistical evidence0
Why the post-identification era is long overdue: Commentary on the current controversy over forensic feature comparison as applied to forensic firearms examination0
The propensity to control: Non-sexual violence as probative of sexual offending in the intimate partner context0
Legal transcription service in the light of access to justice in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State (SNNPRS) judicial system0
0.11348414421082