International Journal of Evidence & Proof

Papers
(The median citation count of International Journal of Evidence & Proof is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making?50
Embodied truths and authentic selves: The constitution of evidence and credibility in rape cases9
Evidence, Risk, and Proof Paradoxes: Pessimism about the Epistemic Project8
State of Ohio v. Ross Compton: Internet-enabled medical device data introduced as evidence of arson and insurance fraud8
Addressing vulnerability in Ireland’s criminal justice system: A survey of recent statutory developments7
Naked statistical evidence and incentives for lawful conduct5
Registered intermediaries’ assessment of children’s communication: An exploration of aims and processes4
Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions4
Rebooting the new evidence scholarship4
‘I am not beholden to anyone… I consider myself to be an officer of the court’: A comparison of the intermediary role in England and Wales and Northern Ireland4
Evidence, probability and relative plausibility4
Laudan’s error: Reasonable doubt and acquittals of guilty people3
Likelihood ratios in psychological expert opinion, and their reception by professional judges3
A case study on shortage of evidence in wrongful convictions in China3
Reported communication challenges for adult witnesses with intellectual disabilities giving evidence in court3
The fate of evidence law: Two paths of development3
Exclusion of evidence in times of mass surveillance. In search of a principled approach to exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases in the European Union2
TheMoorovdoctrine and coercive control: Proving a ‘course of behaviour’ under s. 1 of the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 20182
Proving non-fatal strangulation in family violence cases: A case study on the criminalisation of family violence2
To the exclusion of all others? DNA profile and transfer mechanics—R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021 (03 Aug 2020)2
Intermediaries in Chile: Facilitating the right of child victims and witnesses to participate and be heard in criminal trials2
Are all complainants of sexual assault vulnerable? Views of Australian criminal justice professionals on the evidence-sharing process2
Digital evidence in defence practice: Prevalence, challenges and expertise2
Special investigative measures: Comparison of the Serbian Criminal Procedure Code with the European Court of Human Rights Standards2
Handle with care: Jury deliberation and demeanour-based assessments of witness credibility2
Victim legal representation and the adversarial criminal trial: A critical analysis of proposals for third-party counsel for complainants of serious sexual violence2
Experts and pretenders: Examining possible responses to misconduct by experts in criminal trials in England and Wales1
DNA as ‘ready-made evidence’: An analysis of Portuguese judges’ views1
Turning a graphical method of evidential reasoning into an operational tool for judges? Empirical evidence1
Evidence, probability, and relative plausibility: A response to Aitken, Taroni, and Bozza1
Admissibility of confession evidence: Principles of hearsay and the rule of voluntariness1
Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability1
The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India1
Explaining and trusting expert evidence: What is a ‘sufficiently reliable scientific basis’?1
Preponderance, proportionality, stepwise liability1
Civil liability and the 50%+ standard of proof1
Putting the ‘presumption’ back in the ‘presumption of innocence’1
Resuscitating criminal courts after Covid-19: Trialling a cure worse than the disease1
A comparison between the standard of proof applicable in arbitration and formal adjudication1
‘Show me what happened’: Low technology communication aids used in intermediary mediated police investigative interviews with vulnerable witnesses with an intellectual disability1
Hearsay evidence in Uganda: Understanding its meaning, admissibility and probative value1
The curious case of the jury-shaped hole: A plea for real jury research1
The research on an electronic evidence forensic system for cross-border cybercrime0
Evidence from criminal law experts in Indonesian criminal trials: Usurping the judicial function?0
Corrigendum to Making the case for ECRIS: Post-‘Brexit’ sharing of criminal records information between the European Union and United Kingdom0
Corrigendum to Tapes, transcripts and trials: The routine contamination of police interview evidence0
Vulnerable witnesses in Chilean criminal proceedings: New developments0
The beyond a reasonable doubt standard of proof: Juror understanding and reform0
The economic case for conviction multiplicity0
Editorial0
An epistemological analysis of the use of reputation as evidence0
Reasoning from background knowledge: Evaluating and explaining behaviour in Finnish rape judgments0
A systematic account of probabilistic fallacies in legal fact-finding0
Rethinking the relationship between reverse burdens and the presumption of innocence0
When you say nothing at all: Invoking inferences from suspect silence in the police station0
Indigenous storytelling and admissibility in common law courts: Developing the protocols for the reception theory of evidence0
The exposition of rape in Cyprus: From the crime scene to the court room0
Here is a table: A prolegomenon to a future new evidence scholarship in Africa0
Private communication between lawyers as evidence in a judicial process: A comparative journey0
What do we know about ‘rape myth’ research and the claim that there is ‘overwhelming evidence’ that juries are prejudiced in rape trials?0
Legal transcription service in the light of access to justice in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State (SNNPRS) judicial system0
Examining factors predicting sexual exploitation among victims of human trafficking0
Fight, flight, freeze…or lie? Rethinking the principles of res gestae evidence in light of its revival0
Zombie forensics: the use of the polygraph and the integrity of the criminal justice system in England and Wales0
The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures: Three models compared0
What matters for assessing insider witnesses? Results of an experimental vignette study0
Legal advice privilege: The legacy of Three Rivers (No. 5) and the challenge of providing consistent protection to all client types0
Law enforcement investigation of non-sexual child abuse: Physical abuse, neglect and Abusive Head Trauma0
The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand0
The values of prediction in criminal cases0
An Unforeseen Alliance: The Experience of Mental Health Professionals when Testifying in Sexual Assault Criminal Proceedings0
Psychiatric Evaluation in Chinese Criminal Proceedings:A Legal Perspective0
Search and seizure of electronic devices in India: time for a change?0
Evidence law and economics0
The standard of proof and crime prevention: A theoretical and empirical analysis0
A missing piece in the debate about naked statistical evidence0
Getting people thinking and talking: An exploration of the Attorney General’s 2020 guidelines on disclosure0
Unpacking the exclusionary rule of repeated confessions in China0
Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application0
Combating the ‘myth of physical restraint’ in human trafficking and modern slavery trials heard in the Crown Court0
The skewing effect of outcome evidence0
Re-thinking notions of evidence and proof for sentencing: Towards a more communitarian model0
Book Review0
Similar fact evidence in contractual interpretation: Bhoomatidevi d/o Kishinchand Chugani Mrs Kavita Gope Mirwani v Nantakumar s/o v Ramachandra and another [2023] SGHC 370
Non-defendant bad character and s. 100 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: A socio-legal analysis of admissibility gateways and trial tactics0
Witness Statements for Employment Tribunals in England and Wales: What are the ‘Issues’?0
The peculiarity of American evidence law: An outsider's observation and reflection0
0.024470090866089