Evaluation

Papers
(The TQCC of Evaluation is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-10-01 to 2024-10-01.)
ArticleCitations
Participatory systems mapping for complex energy policy evaluation34
Building a system-based Theory of Change using Participatory Systems Mapping26
Unpacking context in realist evaluations: Findings from a comprehensive review24
A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation20
Methodological reflections on using qualitative research to explore the causal mechanisms of complex health interventions20
Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation19
Tensions of evaluating innovation in a living lab: Moving beyond actionable knowledge production15
Policy evaluation for a complex world: Practical methods and reflections from the UK Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity across the Nexus14
The coronavirus response: Boxed in by models11
Development of a ‘real-world’ logic model through testing the feasibility of a complex healthcare intervention: the challenge of reconciling scalability and context-sensitivity10
How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks10
Evaluation for planetary health10
Monitoring and evaluation for thinking and working politically10
A theory-based approach to evaluations intended to inform transitions toward sustainability10
What should evaluation learn from COP 26? Views of evaluation practitioners9
Accountability versus learning in aid evaluation: A practice-oriented exploration of persistent dilemmas8
Categories of context in realist evaluation7
How does the commissioning process hinder the uptake of complexity-appropriate evaluation?6
Improving a framework for evaluating participatory science6
Surviving the Anthropocene: How evaluation can contribute to knowledge and better policymaking6
Don’t panic: Bringing complexity thinking to UK Government evaluation guidance6
Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation5
Ethics of evaluation for socio-ecological transformation: Case-based critical systems analysis of motivation, power, expertise, and legitimacy5
From abstract to ideal–The limits of models. A reply to Pawson’s ‘boxed in by models’5
How to normalize reflexive evaluation? Navigating between legitimacy and integrity5
Including multiple perspectives in participatory multi-criteria analysis: A framework for investigation5
Clarifying realist analytic and interdisciplinary consensus processes in a complex health intervention: A worked example of Judgemental Rationality in action5
Diagnostic evaluation and Bayesian Updating: Practical solutions to common problems5
Cased-based modelling and scenario simulation for ex-post evaluation5
Re-purposing evaluation to learn about social justice: Reconfiguring epistemological politics through the regulative ideal of ‘participatory parity’4
The constitutive effects of social investment evaluation4
Grounding evaluation capacity development in systems theory4
Power in and of evaluation: A framework of analysis4
How can climate change and its interaction with other compounding risks be considered in evaluation? Experiences from Vietnam4
Evaluating the impact of policy research: Evidence from the evaluation of rural policy research in developing countries4
Using environmental evaluation systems and their contribution to sustainable development4
Developing a theory of change methodology to support the evaluation of place-based systems change interventions to support child and adolescent mental health and well-being3
Evaluation through narratives: A practical case of Participatory Narrative Inquiry in women empowerment evaluation in Niger3
The unused potential of process tracing as evaluation approach: The case of cluster policy evaluation3
Theorizing how interventions work in evaluation: Process-tracing methods and theorizing process theories of change3
How to develop a realist programme theory using Margaret Archer’s structure–agency–culture framework: The case of adolescent accountability for sexual and reproductive health in urban resource-constra3
A theory-based approach to designing interventions for Planetary Health3
Theory building from qualitative evaluation3
Why is impact measurement abandoned in practice? Evidence use in evaluation and contracting for five European Social Impact Bonds3
Program, complexity, and system when evaluating sustainable development3
Causal mapping for evaluators3
0.15188193321228