Evaluation

Papers
(The TQCC of Evaluation is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Participatory systems mapping for complex energy policy evaluation28
Building a system-based Theory of Change using Participatory Systems Mapping22
A critical realist approach to systems thinking in evaluation17
Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation16
Unpacking context in realist evaluations: Findings from a comprehensive review15
Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics15
How do policy evaluators understand complexity?14
Tensions of evaluating innovation in a living lab: Moving beyond actionable knowledge production13
Methodological reflections on using qualitative research to explore the causal mechanisms of complex health interventions13
Policy evaluation for a complex world: Practical methods and reflections from the UK Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity across the Nexus12
The coronavirus response: Boxed in by models11
Evaluation for planetary health8
What should evaluation learn from COP 26? Views of evaluation practitioners8
Positing a schema of measurable outcomes of cultural engagement7
Towards systemic evaluation in turbulent times – Second-order practice shift7
Evaluators in the Anthropocene7
Monitoring and evaluation for thinking and working politically7
Accountability versus learning in aid evaluation: A practice-oriented exploration of persistent dilemmas6
Re-framing accountability and learning through evaluation: Insights from the Italian higher education evaluation system6
How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks6
Biopolitical power and paradoxes in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth6
Clarifying realist analytic and interdisciplinary consensus processes in a complex health intervention: A worked example of Judgemental Rationality in action5
Development of a ‘real-world’ logic model through testing the feasibility of a complex healthcare intervention: the challenge of reconciling scalability and context-sensitivity5
Don’t panic: Bringing complexity thinking to UK Government evaluation guidance5
How does the commissioning process hinder the uptake of complexity-appropriate evaluation?5
Diagnostic evaluation and Bayesian Updating: Practical solutions to common problems5
Surviving the Anthropocene: How evaluation can contribute to knowledge and better policymaking4
Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation4
A theory-based approach to evaluations intended to inform transitions toward sustainability4
From abstract to ideal–The limits of models. A reply to Pawson’s ‘boxed in by models’4
Evaluating the impact of policy research: Evidence from the evaluation of rural policy research in developing countries4
Categories of context in realist evaluation4
The constitutive effects of social investment evaluation4
Improving a framework for evaluating participatory science4
Using contribution analysis to evaluate large-scale, transformation change processes3
Why is impact measurement abandoned in practice? Evidence use in evaluation and contracting for five European Social Impact Bonds3
Re-purposing evaluation to learn about social justice: Reconfiguring epistemological politics through the regulative ideal of ‘participatory parity’3
Grounding evaluation capacity development in systems theory3
How can critical deliberative theory help to solve the methodological challenges of evaluating from a gender + perspective?3
How to normalize reflexive evaluation? Navigating between legitimacy and integrity3
Using environmental evaluation systems and their contribution to sustainable development3
0.039100885391235