Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The TQCC of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?32
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 202222
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)17
Issue Information16
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?13
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice12
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online9
Issue Information8
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences7
6
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis5
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland5
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology5
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory5
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour5
4
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit4
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection3
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions3
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report3
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)2
2
Issue Information2
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)2
Editorial acknowledgement2
Issue Information2
0.11163902282715