Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The TQCC of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects32
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice22
Consequences of child maltreatment victimisation in internalising and externalising mental health problems17
Towards reflexivity in police practice and research16
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory13
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources ofpro‐prosecutionbias in judges12
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online9
Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research8
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents7
Psychopathic traits predict moral judgements in five moral domains: The mediating effect of unpleasantness7
Contributions of the dark triad to moral disengagement among incarcerated and community adults7
‘Rapport myopia’ in investigative interviews: Evidence from linguistic and subjective indicators of rapport6
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences5
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit5
Confirmation bias in simulated CSA interviews: How abuse assumption influences interviewing and decision‐making processes?5
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)5
Preschoolers’ true and false reports: Comparing effects of the Sequential Interview and NICHD protocol5
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues4
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)4
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals4
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?3
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour3
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda3
Swedish police officers' strategies when interviewing suspects who decline to answer questions2
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions2
Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments2
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod, Rentfrow, & Robbins, 20192
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice2
Combined Anchoring: Prosecution and defense claims as sequential anchors in the courtroom2
Importance‐related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario2
0.02351188659668