Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The median citation count of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?32
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 202222
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)17
Issue Information16
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?13
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice12
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online9
Issue Information8
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences7
6
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology5
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory5
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour5
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis5
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland5
4
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit4
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions3
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report3
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection3
Issue Information2
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)2
Editorial acknowledgement2
Issue Information2
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)2
2
Issue Information1
Issue Information1
Correction to “Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice”Zmigrod, L. (2022). Suscept1
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach1
1
Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects1
Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression1
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice1
Exploring the relationships between criminal self‐efficacy factors and recidivism1
Growth mindset results in reduced trait attribution and more rehabilitative judicial decisions in cases of juvenile delinquency1
1
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments0
Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies0
Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
0
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources ofpro‐prosecutionbias in judges0
Towards reflexivity in police practice and research0
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)0
Issue Information0
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)0
Some lie‐detection may actually be of forensic use: A comment on Brennen and Magnussen, Lie‐detection: What works0
0
0
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals0
The impact of childhood adversity on female‐perpetrated intimate partner violence in young adulthood0
Confirmation bias in simulated CSA interviews: How abuse assumption influences interviewing and decision‐making processes?0
Pushing past the plateau0
Applicability and validity of the reaction time‐based concealed information test in a prison sample0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology0
Relationship between psychopathic traits and moral sensitivity in a university student sample0
Interviewing witnesses in a second language: A comparison of interpreter‐assisted, unaided, and self‐administered interviews0
Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research0
(In)credibly queer? Assessments of asylum claims based on sexual orientation0
Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation0
Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
On the use of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve in eyewitness memory research0
Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses0
The language of high‐stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations0
Editorial Acknowledgement0
0
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues0
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences0
Swedish police officers' strategies when interviewing suspects who decline to answer questions0
‘Rapport myopia’ in investigative interviews: Evidence from linguistic and subjective indicators of rapport0
Editorial acknowledgement0
Issue Information0
The adaptable law enforcement officer: Exploring adaptability in a covert police context0
The perils of methods that detect lies 70% of the time: A reply to Ben‐Shakhar and Verschuere (2024)0
Multi‐study examination of criminal‐legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision‐making0
Stigmatising attitudes of probation, parole and custodial officers towards people with mental health issues: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis0
Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication0
(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis0
Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility0
Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012)0
From imposing cognitive load to exploiting different strategies: A reply to Brimbal et al. (2023)0
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda0
Consequences of child maltreatment victimisation in internalising and externalising mental health problems0
Investigating dual harm and misconduct in Northern Ireland: A 1‐year follow‐up0
The delayed impact of informed versus blind interviewing on eyewitness memory0
Importance‐related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario0
Similar rates of denial in NICHD and control interviews with alleged child abuse victims in the Netherlands0
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?0
Combined Anchoring: Prosecution and defense claims as sequential anchors in the courtroom0
The effect of episodic future thinking ability on subjective cue use when judging credibility0
Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice, low self‐control, and recidivism after release from prison0
Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits0
0.045325994491577