Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The median citation count of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Chinese judicial personnel's attitudes toward courtroom injustice: The interplay of gender and professional role24
23
The self‐administered interview does not impair identification but distorts its confidence14
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions11
Assessment of parental attachment and early maladaptive schemas in juvenile boy offenders in Turkiye; A case–control study11
Growth mindset results in reduced trait attribution and more rehabilitative judicial decisions in cases of juvenile delinquency9
The effects of confidence consistency and delay on perceptions of eyewitness credibility9
8
On the use of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve in eyewitness memory research8
Response to Marchetti et al.'s and Felstead & Patihis' comments on my paper on “alternative truths”8
Employability perceptions and the disclosure of a violent offence6
There is only one truth, the objective truth, in recovered memory cases6
6
Predictors of fraud victimization among the older adults in China: A machine learning analysis5
Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation5
Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism5
The impact of model statements on verbal differences between truth and lies when using a comparable truthful baseline5
5
The history of an idea: The misinformation effect4
Female juvenile recidivism in Turkey: Independent correlates and implications for forensic risk assessment4
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour4
Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory4
The three‐dimensional dynamic model of legal socialization: A cross‐cultural theoretical integration of Chinese and Western research4
Effective faking of verbal deception detection with target‐aligned adversarial attacks3
Reply to Nachson3
British False Memory Society: Caseload and details by year (1993 onwards)3
Narrative completeness and investigation relevant information in child sexual abuse3
Judicial reliance on CBCA criteria and their predictive relevance in verdict outcomes: A quantitative analysis of South Korean court rulings3
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals3
Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses3
Issue Information2
Similar rates of denial in NICHD and control interviews with alleged child abuse victims in the Netherlands2
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)2
Factors influencing recidivism among female inmates in drug‐related cases in Thailand: Self‐compassion, antisocial personality, guilt, and hope2
Interviewing witnesses in a second language: A comparison of interpreter‐assisted, unaided, and self‐administered interviews2
Exploring common ground in the repressed versus false memories debate2
The link between suspect verbosity during investigative interviews and observer‐rapport2
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 20222
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice2
The effect of episodic future thinking ability on subjective cue use when judging credibility2
Issue Information2
Editorial acknowledgement1
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach1
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues1
The perils of methods that detect lies 70% of the time: A reply to Ben‐Shakhar and Verschuere (2024)1
Perceptions of interrogation techniques and personality traits of citizen judges in Japan1
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis1
Statement validity assessment of students' sexual assault accounts: Comparison of honest reports, false denials and false allegations using the criteria‐based content analyses and the verifiability ap1
Predicting suggestive questioning from cognitions and emotions about child sexual abuse across three study paradigms1
Applicability and validity of the reaction time‐based concealed information test in a prison sample1
Polygraph testing abuses in National Registry of Exonerations false confession cases1
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?1
Does the setting matter? Characterizing and classifying rural and urban arsonists1
Editorial acknowledgement1
From imposing cognitive load to exploiting different strategies: A reply to Brimbal et al. (2023)1
Stigmatising attitudes of probation, parole and custodial officers towards people with mental health issues: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis1
Can highly arousing traumatic Experiences be repressed?1
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20191
The history of an idea: The NICHD Protocol, Standard, and Revised1
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)1
The weight of evidence regarding the nature of traumatic memories: A comment on Mazzoni et al.1
Distinct patterns in the accuracy of child testimonies: Evidence from a cluster‐based comparison with case records1
Multi‐study examination of criminal‐legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision‐making1
Reply to Otgaar et al.1
Editorial acknowledgement0
A comment on‚ Dissociative Amnesia: A Valid Construct for Repressed Memories by Hans J. Markowitsch and Angelica Staniloiu0
Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility0
Repressed Memory and Dissociative Amnesia: The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon of Memory Loss0
(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis0
An analysis of COVID ‐19's impact on the emergence of bicycle theft in Japan using Gaussian process regression0
Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits0
Issue Information0
Reflections on British False Memory Society cases, middle ground, and inferring internal mental processes0
Issue Information0
0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Dissociative amnesia – A valid construct for repressed memories0
[Can you] Tell me? Children's and adults' responses to open‐ended prompts beginning with ‘Can you’0
On the cognitive processes underlying the verbal overshadowing effect: Culprit descriptions reduce culprit‐presence detection and guessing‐based selection in eyewitness responses to lineups0
Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication0
Intimates, acquaintances or strangers? Profiling the victim–offender relationship in homicides through offenders' behavioural patterns0
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology0
Laypersons' perceptions of sex trafficking victimisation and attribution of blame0
0
0
Some lie‐detection may actually be of forensic use: A comment on Brennen and Magnussen, Lie‐detection: What works0
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory0
0
Unchained voices: Exploring incarcerated women's pathways to restorative justice0
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?0
Editorial acknowledgement0
Reproducibility in lie detection research: A case study of the cue called complications0
Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice, low self‐control, and recidivism after release from prison0
Comment on Nachson: Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
Can metamemory judgements predict the risk of memory contamination for facial descriptions?0
On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025)0
Exploring the relationships between criminal self‐efficacy factors and recidivism0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda0
Reply0
(In)credibly queer? Assessments of asylum claims based on sexual orientation0
Comment on Otgaar et al.: The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
Issue Information0
Fore! Does forewarning inoculate people against the false balance effect?0
The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
Evaluation of a modified procedure for rating the presence of HCR ‐20  V3 risk factors0
Correction to “Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice”Zmigrod, L. (2022). Suscept0
Urgent issues and prospects in guilty plea research and practice0
Self‐referential complex trial protocol: Identifying criminals and witnesses in virtual reality scenarios0
Issue Information0
Perceptions of people radicalised online: Examining the victim‐perpetrator nexus0
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?0
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland0
Comment on G. Mazzoni et al. ‘Taking the middle stance in the debate on the nature of traumatic memories’0
Issue Information0
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences0
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)0
Comments0
Procedural justice, legal cynicism and recidivism: A longitudinal test among people on community supervision0
Comment on Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’0
Investigating dual harm and misconduct in Northern Ireland: A 1‐year follow‐up0
Issue Information0
Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Taking the middle stance in the debate on the nature of traumatic memories0
Damned if you don't: Public perceptions of polygraph testing and suspect willingness to be tested0
Measuring the will to obey the law: Development and validation of the law‐abiding volition scale0
Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012)0
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report0
The role of defendant race, expert testimony and interrogation coerciveness on Canadian mock jurors' perceptions of recanted confessions0
Challenges and future directions in studying sequencing as a debiasing strategy in forensic psychological assessment: A commentary on Kukucka and Quigley‐McBride (2025)0
Possible factors associated with increased risk for false memories but decreased convictions in the British False Memory Society data: A comment on Patihis and Felstead0
Evaluating the effectiveness of a practitioner‐designed science‐based interviewing and interrogation course: A collaborative training and research effort0
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents0
Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology0
From childhood trauma to malicious creativity: The parallel mediation of impulsivity and callous‐unemotional traits in male juvenile offenders0
Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment0
Issue Information0
0
The Debate is still going on: A comment on “British False Memory Society: Caseload and Details by Year (1993 Onwards)” by Lawrence Patihis and Kevin Felstead0
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection0
The delayed impact of informed versus blind interviewing on eyewitness memory0
Are traumatic memories at first extraordinarily bad and then extraordinarily good?0
The impact of childhood adversity on female‐perpetrated intimate partner violence in young adulthood0
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges0
0.0415940284729