Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The median citation count of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences36
20
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions18
Growth mindset results in reduced trait attribution and more rehabilitative judicial decisions in cases of juvenile delinquency17
The effects of confidence consistency and delay on perceptions of eyewitness credibility16
The self‐administered interview does not impair identification but distorts its confidence16
Consequences of child maltreatment victimisation in internalising and externalising mental health problems12
There is only one truth, the objective truth, in recovered memory cases9
Response to Marchetti et al.'s and Felstead & Patihis' comments on my paper on “alternative truths”8
Towards reflexivity in police practice and research7
7
On the use of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve in eyewitness memory research7
Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism6
6
Issue Information5
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20195
Relationship between psychopathic traits and moral sensitivity in a university student sample5
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour5
Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation5
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents4
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals3
British False Memory Society: Caseload and details by year (1993 onwards)3
Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory3
Reply to Nachson3
Importance‐related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario3
Swedish police officers' strategies when interviewing suspects who decline to answer questions3
Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses2
Factors influencing recidivism among female inmates in drug‐related cases in Thailand: Self‐compassion, antisocial personality, guilt, and hope2
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 20222
Issue Information2
Exploring common ground in the repressed versus false memories debate2
The effect of episodic future thinking ability on subjective cue use when judging credibility2
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice2
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online2
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)2
Similar rates of denial in NICHD and control interviews with alleged child abuse victims in the Netherlands2
Interviewing witnesses in a second language: A comparison of interpreter‐assisted, unaided, and self‐administered interviews2
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit2
Stigmatising attitudes of probation, parole and custodial officers towards people with mental health issues: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis1
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach1
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research1
Multi‐study examination of criminal‐legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision‐making1
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?1
Issue Information1
The perils of methods that detect lies 70% of the time: A reply to Ben‐Shakhar and Verschuere (2024)1
From imposing cognitive load to exploiting different strategies: A reply to Brimbal et al. (2023)1
Reply to Otgaar et al.1
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory1
Are traumatic memories at first extraordinarily bad and then extraordinarily good?1
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues1
Can highly arousing traumatic Experiences be repressed?1
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20191
Applicability and validity of the reaction time‐based concealed information test in a prison sample1
Pushing past the plateau1
The weight of evidence regarding the nature of traumatic memories: A comment on Mazzoni et al.1
1
Issue Information0
Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment0
Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication0
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology0
Issue Information0
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland0
0
Correction to “Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice”Zmigrod, L. (2022). Suscept0
Comment on Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’0
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)0
Reproducibility in lie detection research: A case study of the cue called complications0
Damned if you don't: Public perceptions of polygraph testing and suspect willingness to be tested0
(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis0
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences0
On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025)0
Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice, low self‐control, and recidivism after release from prison0
The delayed impact of informed versus blind interviewing on eyewitness memory0
Repressed Memory and Dissociative Amnesia: The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon of Memory Loss0
Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility0
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report0
Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012)0
Confirmation bias in simulated CSA interviews: How abuse assumption influences interviewing and decision‐making processes?0
The adaptable law enforcement officer: Exploring adaptability in a covert police context0
The language of high‐stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations0
Some lie‐detection may actually be of forensic use: A comment on Brennen and Magnussen, Lie‐detection: What works0
Comments0
Editorial Acknowledgement0
Perceptions of people radicalised online: Examining the victim‐perpetrator nexus0
Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments0
Challenges and future directions in studying sequencing as a debiasing strategy in forensic psychological assessment: A commentary on Kukucka and Quigley‐McBride (2025)0
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Exploring the relationships between criminal self‐efficacy factors and recidivism0
0
Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies0
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Comment on Nachson: Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
Issue Information0
Investigating dual harm and misconduct in Northern Ireland: A 1‐year follow‐up0
Editorial acknowledgement0
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
0
Issue Information0
0
Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
Reflections on British False Memory Society cases, middle ground, and inferring internal mental processes0
Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology0
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection0
Reply0
Urgent issues and prospects in guilty plea research and practice0
A comment on‚ Dissociative Amnesia: A Valid Construct for Repressed Memories by Hans J. Markowitsch and Angelica Staniloiu0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
0
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?0
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents0
Issue Information0
Dissociative amnesia – A valid construct for repressed memories0
Issue Information0
Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression0
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?0
Comment on G. Mazzoni et al. ‘Taking the middle stance in the debate on the nature of traumatic memories’0
Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources ofpro‐prosecutionbias in judges0
The Debate is still going on: A comment on “British False Memory Society: Caseload and Details by Year (1993 Onwards)” by Lawrence Patihis and Kevin Felstead0
The impact of childhood adversity on female‐perpetrated intimate partner violence in young adulthood0
Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits0
(In)credibly queer? Assessments of asylum claims based on sexual orientation0
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice0
Comment on Otgaar et al.: The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
Possible factors associated with increased risk for false memories but decreased convictions in the British False Memory Society data: A comment on Patihis and Felstead0
Taking the middle stance in the debate on the nature of traumatic memories0
The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
0.38285207748413