Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The median citation count of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects29
Coexisting violence and self‐harm: Dual harm in an early‐stage male prison population23
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice20
Urgent issues and prospects in reforming interrogation practices in the United States and Canada17
Context effect and confirmation bias in criminal fact finding16
The effects of cognitive load during an investigative interviewing task on mock interviewers’ recall of information14
Towards reflexivity in police practice and research14
How emotions affect judgement and decision making in an interrogation scenario13
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory11
Consequences of child maltreatment victimisation in internalising and externalising mental health problems10
How guilty and innocent suspects perceive the police and themselves: suspect interviews in Germany10
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources of pro‐prosecution bias in judges9
Sanctions, short‐term mindsets, and delinquency: Reverse causality in a sample of high school youth7
Contributions of the dark triad to moral disengagement among incarcerated and community adults7
Verbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information7
Psychopathic traits predict moral judgements in five moral domains: The mediating effect of unpleasantness6
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online5
Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research5
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents5
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences4
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit4
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)4
Validity of the MacDonald triad as a forensic construct: Links with psychopathology and patterns of aggression in sex offenders4
‘Rapport myopia’ in investigative interviews: Evidence from linguistic and subjective indicators of rapport3
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod, Rentfrow, & Robbins, 20193
Risk relevance of psychometric assessment and evaluator ratings of dynamic risk factors in high‐risk violent offenders3
The acculturation effect and eyewitness memory reports among migrants3
Confirmation bias in simulated CSA interviews: How abuse assumption influences interviewing and decision‐making processes?3
Misinformation encountered during a simulated jury deliberation can distort jurors' memory of a trial and bias their verdicts3
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda2
Preschoolers’ true and false reports: Comparing effects of the Sequential Interview and NICHD protocol2
Importance‐related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario2
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues2
Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments2
Reply to Mac Giolla and Ly (2019): On the reporting of Bayes factors in deception research2
Interviewing witnesses in a second language: A comparison of interpreter‐assisted, unaided, and self‐administered interviews1
Pushing past the plateau1
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?1
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions1
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences1
The effect of episodic future thinking ability on subjective cue use when judging credibility1
Stigmatising attitudes of probation, parole and custodial officers towards people with mental health issues: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis1
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)1
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland1
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour1
Combined Anchoring: Prosecution and defense claims as sequential anchors in the courtroom1
Swedish police officers' strategies when interviewing suspects who decline to answer questions1
Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012)1
When and how are lies told? And the role of culture and intentions in intelligence‐gathering interviews1
Issue Information0
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?0
0
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice0
Issue Information0
0
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Editorial Acknowledgement0
Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses0
Some lie‐detection may actually be of forensic use: A comment on Brennen and Magnussen, Lie‐detection: What works0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
Editorial acknowledgement0
The language of high‐stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations0
Issue Information0
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression0
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection0
Issue Information0
From imposing cognitive load to exploiting different strategies: A reply to Brimbal et al. (2023)0
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis0
Relationship between psychopathic traits and moral sensitivity in a university student sample0
Is psychological treatment equally effective for intimate partner violence perpetrators with and without childhood family violence?0
The delayed impact of informed versus blind interviewing on eyewitness memory0
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals0
0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
Issue Information0
Editorial acknowledgement0
Issue Information0
Issue Information0
0
0
0
Investigating dual harm and misconduct in Northern Ireland: A 1‐year follow‐up0
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 20220
Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation0
Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Issue Information0
The adaptable law enforcement officer: Exploring adaptability in a covert police context0
Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication0
Editorial Acknowledgement0
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach0
0
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report0
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)0
0
0.016497135162354