Organizational Research Methods

Papers
(The H4-Index of Organizational Research Methods is 21. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity297
The Why and How of the Integrative Review140
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research119
Moving Beyond Templates: A Bricolage Approach to Conducting Trustworthy Qualitative Research107
Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data101
Text Preprocessing for Text Mining in Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations91
Theorizing Through Literature Reviews: The Miner-Prospector Continuum89
Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews65
From Templates to Heuristics: How and Why to Move Beyond the Gioia Methodology58
Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research56
A Marginal Effects Approach to Interpreting Main Effects and Moderation54
Will the Questions Ever End? Person-Level Increases in Careless Responding During Questionnaire Completion40
Computational Literature Reviews: Method, Algorithms, and Roadmap39
A Robust Bootstrap Test for Mediation Analysis38
Review Research as Scientific Inquiry38
The Practice of Innovating Research Methods33
Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment30
Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions29
Templates in Qualitative Research Methods: Origins, Limitations, and New Directions26
Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews25
Attitude Toward the Color Blue: An Ideal Marker Variable25
Partnering Up: Including Managers as Research Partners in Systematic Reviews21
The Quick and the Careless: The Construct Validity of Page Time as a Measure of Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys21
0.017030000686646