Psychology Public Policy and Law

Papers
(The TQCC of Psychology Public Policy and Law is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-07-01 to 2024-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
COVID-19 and prison policies related to communication with family members.36
Are Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) psychopaths dangerous, untreatable, and without conscience? A systematic review of the empirical evidence.31
The stigma of incarceration experience: A systematic review.26
Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020).24
The adversarial mindset.21
Investigating the effect of emotional stress on adult memory for single and repeated events.20
Identity, legitimacy and cooperation with police: Comparing general-population and street-population samples from London.18
Releasing individuals from incarceration during COVID-19: Pandemic-related challenges and recommendations for promoting successful reentry.16
Allegations of family violence in court: How parental alienation affects judicial outcomes.13
Forensic e-mental health: Review, research priorities, and policy directions.13
Adherence to the Revised NICHD Protocol recommendations for conducting repeated supportive interviews is associated with the likelihood that children will allege abuse.13
Static-99R: Strengths, limitations, predictive accuracy meta-analysis, and legal admissibility review.13
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and family dispute resolution: A randomized controlled trial comparing shuttle mediation, videoconferencing mediation, and litigation.12
Do structured risk assessments predict violent, any, and sexual offending better than unstructured judgment? An umbrella review.12
Measuring youths’ perceptions of police: Evidence from the crossroads study.12
Making the case for videoconferencing and remote child custody evaluations (RCCEs): The empirical, ethical, and evidentiary arguments for accepting new technology.11
Assessment of bias in police lineups.10
Tele-forensic interviewing to elicit children’s evidence—Benefits, risks, and practical considerations.10
A test of three refresher modalities on child forensic interviewers’ posttraining performance.10
Trauma-informed forensic mental health assessment: Practical implications, ethical tensions, and alignment with therapeutic jurisprudence principles.9
Psychosis and mass shootings: A systematic examination using publicly available data.9
Identification and incidence of child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.9
Child victim empathy mediates the influence of jurors’ sexual abuse experiences on child sexual abuse case judgments: Meta-analyses.9
Defining coercion: An application in interrogation and plea negotiation contexts.9
Remote forensic evaluations and treatment in the time of COVID-19: An international survey of psychologists and psychiatrists.9
Police interviewing behaviors and commercially sexually exploited adolescents’ reluctance.8
Teaching child investigative interviewing skills: Long-term retention requires cumulative training.8
Empirical evidence from state legislators: How, when, and who uses research.8
Using disclosure, common ground, and verification to build rapport and elicit information.7
Children who offend: Why are prevention and intervention efforts to reduce persistent criminality so seldom applied?7
A meta-analysis of lineup size effects on eyewitness identification.7
Politics or prejudice? Separating the influence of political affiliation and prejudicial attitudes in determining support for hate crime law.7
The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.6
Court accommodations for persons with severe communication disabilities: A legal scoping review.6
Statutes governing juvenile competency to stand trial proceedings: An analysis of consistency with best practice recommendations.6
The point of diminishing returns in juvenile probation: Probation requirements and risk of technical probation violations among first-time probation-involved youth.6
Challenges of a “toolbox” approach to investigative interviewing: A critical analysis of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s (RCMP) Phased Interview Model.6
Assessing the effect of eyewitness identification confidence assessment method on the confidence-accuracy relationship.6
The PCL–R and capital sentencing: A commentary on “Death is different” DeMatteo et al. (2020a).5
The developmental reform in juvenile justice: Its progress and vulnerability.5
The influence of transition prompt wording on response informativeness and rapidity of disclosure in child forensic interviews.5
Forensic evaluators’ opinions on the use of videoconferencing technology for competency to stand trial evaluations after the onset of COVID-19.5
Diversion as a pathway to improving service utilization among at-risk youth.5
Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.5
Current investigator practices and beliefs on interviewing trafficked minors.4
Eyewitness identification: The complex issue of suspect-filler similarity.4
The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia competence to stand trial evaluations.4
The association between hate crime laws that enumerate sexual orientation and adolescent suicide attempts.4
Flattening the curve in jails and prisons: Factors underlying support for COVID-19 mitigation policies.4
Judicial work and traumatic stress: Vilification, threats, and secondary trauma on the bench.4
The continuing unfairness of death qualification: Changing death penalty attitudes and capital jury selection.4
Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments.4
Evaluating selection for sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment: A comparison of those committed, not committed, and nearly committed.4
0.045706033706665