Psychology Public Policy and Law

Papers
(The TQCC of Psychology Public Policy and Law is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Supplemental Material for Legal Perceptions of Forensic Mental Health Professionals’ Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations50
Supplemental Material for The Impact of Race on Assessor’s Ability to Differentiate Accurate and Inaccurate Witness Identifications: Areas of Vulnerability, Bias, and Discriminatory Outcomes17
A scoping review and meta-analyses of clinical override use in structured risk assessments: Clinical and training implications for field practice.16
Psychiatric and legal issues surrounding the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: The importance of considering the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.15
Fighting an inner battle: The effects of deployment experiences on ex-military prison staff in England and Wales.15
Questioning child and adolescent sex abuse victims at trial: A gender-based investigation.15
The ability to infer witness accuracy from high-confidence lineup identifications is undermined by the appearance-change instruction and target appearance change.15
Adult male rape myths in England since 1994: A systemic mixed methods review.14
Evaluating the adverse impact ratio and its associated uncertainty: A Bayesian approach.13
Supplemental Material for Do Black and White Innocent Mock Suspects Differ in How Forthcoming They Are Under the Strategic Use of Evidence Technique? First Findings and Their Theoretical and Practical12
Cognition and incentives in plea decisions: Categorical differences in outcomes as the tipping point for innocent defendants.11
Tracking dynamic intervention needs as a vehicle for mitigating risk among juveniles with sex offenses.10
Shifting school climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, and other sexual and gender minority students: An impact analysis of Florida’s “don’t say gay” law.10
Wrongful conviction disadvantages exonerees in subsequent criminal trials.10
Difficulties in attorneys’ before/after questions in child sexual abuse trials.9
Towards family preservation: A systematic jurisdiction analysis of prison visitation policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.9
The limited value of machine learning approach to improving predictive performance: The Ministry of Justice Case Assessment Tool.8
Proxy assessments and early pretrial release: Effects on criminal case and recidivism outcomes.8
Psychological science from research to policy: Eyewitness identifications in Pennsylvania police agencies.8
The role of perceived restorative justice understanding and sympathy in a brief restorative justice intervention in prison.7
Correctional officer turnover intentions and mental illness symptom: Testing the potential confounding effects of resilience.7
Parental drug use as a form of potential child maltreatment in the United States: A review of state statutes.7
Risk communication practices in risk assessment tools: A systematic review across violent, sexual, or general offending.7
Development of the Interview and Interrogation Assessment Instrument.7
Acknowledgment of Ad Hoc Reviewers (2025)7
Supplemental Material for Evaluation of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Administration Formats in a Court-Affiliated Family Mediation Program6
Beyond a reasonable doubt: Ordinary people’s views of an extraordinary concept.6
Supplemental Material for Crossing the Line: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jurisdictional Variations in SORNA Statutes6
Judicial involvement in plea-bargaining.5
Confidence lexicon: An evidence-based tool for communicating eyewitness confidence.5
Toward a multidimensional model of legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale.5
Following up after Moore and Hall: A national survey of state legislation defining intellectual disability.5
Supplemental Material for “Is It Hard to Remember?” Attorneys’ Questions About Children’s Memory in Child Sexual Abuse Trials5
A critical discussion of youth Miranda waivers, racial inequity, and proposed policy reforms.5
Do psychopathic persons lack empathy? An exploratory systematic review of empathy assessment and emotion recognition studies in psychopathy checklist samples.5
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder evidence in Canadian criminal cases: A case law review.5
Recidivism and violations among sexually violent persons on supervised release.5
The risks and consequences of innocence in school discipline: Implications for policy and research.5
An ecodevelopmental framework for reconceptualizing youth probation outcomes.4
Supplemental Material for Evaluation of the 911 Considering Offender Probability in Statements Scale as a Deception Detection Method for 911 Calls4
Public perception on policies to address prenatal substance use: Recommendations regarding maternal criminal prosecution and child welfare.4
Supplemental Material for Young People’s Likelihood of Intervention to Nonconsensual Touching in Nightlife Settings: Interactions of Gender, Relationship to the Bystander, and the Recipient’s Reaction4
The effect of trauma education judicial instructions on decisions about complainant credibility in rape trials.4
Defense attorney practices in referring clients for competence evaluations.4
A window of opportunity: Examining the potential impact of mandatory sexual assault kit (SAK) testing legislation on crime prevention.4
Navigating reluctance in Dutch child forensic interviews: Interviewers tend to reject avoidant and denial statements regardless of NICHD protocol training.4
The power of victim narrative: Eponymous legislation increases voter sympathy and support.4
What’s reasonable? An experimental test of the reasonable officer standard.4
Intellectual disability and adjudicative competence evaluations: A detailed review of an often-overlooked population.4
Supplemental Material for Race-Based Jury Instructions: An Empirical Test of Recommendations From R. v. Barton (2019) and R. v. Chouhan (2021)4
Lay (mis)perceptions of suspect-identification accuracy from biased and unbiased lineups.4
0.2937798500061