Assessing Writing

Papers
(The TQCC of Assessing Writing is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study94
Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework61
Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study50
Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices45
Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach44
Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials43
Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance35
The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance34
Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts33
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms32
Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college-level L2 writers’ proficiency29
Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing24
“I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing21
Assessing L2 student writing feedback literacy: A scale development and validation study21
eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system21
Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences20
Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study18
The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality18
L2 learners’ agentic engagement in an assessment as learning-focused writing classroom18
Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts18
Chinese EFL Teachers’ Writing Assessment Feedback Literacy: A Scale Development and Validation Study16
Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students’ attitudes and writing skills16
Incremental Intelligence Matters: How L2 Writing Mindsets Impact Feedback Orientation and Self-Regulated Learning Writing Strategies15
Explicit strategy-based instruction in L2 writing contexts: A perspective of self-regulated learning and formative assessment15
Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance14
Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES)14
Syntactic complexity in L2 learners’ argumentative writing: Developmental stages and the within-genre topic effect14
Moodle quizzes and their usability for formative assessment of academic writing14
Assessing the metacognitive awareness relevant to L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer in L2 writing: The cases of Chinese EFL writers across proficiency levels14
Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups13
Complementation of multiple sources of feedback in EFL learners’ writing12
Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays12
Dependency distance measures in assessing L2 writing proficiency12
Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision10
Automated assessment of learner text complexity10
Reconceptualizing the impact of feedback in second language writing: A multidimensional perspective10
Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision?10
Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres10
Transfer of ideal L1 and L2 writing selves and their impacts on L2 writing enjoyment and integrated writing performance10
The impact of essay organization and overall quality on the holistic scoring of EFL writing: Perspectives from classroom english teachers and national writing raters10
The Preservice Teacher Self-Efficacy for Writing Inventory (PTSWI): A tool for measuring beliefs about writing9
Validating a rubric for assessing integrated writing in an EAP context9
Examining L2 English University students’ uses of lexical bundles and their relationship to writing quality8
Assessing Business English writing: The development and validation of a proficiency scale8
Dynamic assessment of argumentative writing: Mediating task response8
Effects of L1 single-text and multiple-text comprehension on L2 integrated writing8
The development and validation of an inventory on English writing teacher beliefs8
Cognitive validity evidence of computer- and paper-based writing tests and differences in the impact on EFL test-takers in classroom assessment8
Association of keyboarding fluency and writing performance in online-delivered assessment8
Diagnosing writing ability using China’s Standards of English Language Ability: Application of cognitive diagnosis models8
Assessing linguistic complexity features in L2 writing: Understanding effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning within the realm of task readiness7
Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices7
Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing from sources: Self-efficacy and performance7
Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing assessment7
It takes two to tango: Investigating teacher-student interactions related to written corrective feedback with Activity Theory7
Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: A study of assessing less proficient EFL writers’ text quality7
Reflexive writing dialogues: Elementary students’ perceptions and performances as writers during classroom experiences6
Linguistic, cultural and substantive patterns in L2 writing: A qualitative illustration of MisLevy’s sociocognitive perspective on assessment6
Diagnosing EFL undergraduates’ discourse competence in academic writing6
Noun phrasal complexity in ESL written essays under a constructed-response task: Examining proficiency and topic effects6
Individual differences in L2 writing feedback-seeking behaviors: The predictive roles of various motivational constructs6
Investigating the authenticity of computer- and paper-based ESL writing tests6
The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment5
The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language5
A multidimensional approach to assessing the effects of task complexity on L2 students’ argumentative writing5
Appropriateness as an aspect of lexical richness: What do quantitative measures tell us about children's writing?5
Using Eli review as a strategy for feedback in online courses5
Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students' text revisions in writing5
0.021932125091553