Journal of Philosophical Research

Papers
(The median citation count of Journal of Philosophical Research is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Rescuing Transracialism6
The Impossible Knowledge of the Heterogeneous4
Glasgow on Death's Badness and Radiant Value3
Speaking for Others Beyond Representation3
Understanding Logical Evidence, With Lessons From The Paradoxes2
Epistemic Trust in the Age of Misinformation2
Engagement, Experience, and Value1
Hegel on the Universals of Indexicals1
Are Cultural Explanations for Racial Disparities Racist? in advance1
Measure for Measure: Exploring the Virtues of Vice Epistemology1
Pragmatic Analyses of Indispensability Arguments1
Political Normativity as Functional Normativity1
Death, Value, Gratitude, and Solace1
Response to "Empathy, Timeliness, and Virtuous Hearing"1
Socially-extended Critical and Sympathetic Support1
Empathy, Timeliness, and Virtuous Hearing1
On What We Owe in Attention0
Précis for Speaking for Others0
Reply to Amy Flowerree0
Epistemic Character Damage and Normative Contextualism0
Reply to Rik Peels0
The Meaning of Music in Hegel0
Precis of the Mismeasure of the Self0
First-person Authority and Epistemic Injustice0
The Role of Picturing In Sellars’s Practical Philosophy0
The Critiques of Ethical Hedonism0
EVIDENTIALISM, RATIONAL DELIBERATION, AND THE BASING RELATION in advance0
An Error Theory for Misanthropy in advance0
The Speaking for Spectrum0
Hume on the Essence of the Mind0
Do All Interesting Experiences Add to the Quality of Life?0
The Problem of Political Normativity Understood as Functional Normativity in advance0
Epistemic Virtues and Vices as Attitudes: Implications for Empirical Measures and Virtue Interventions0
Knowing Your Mind by Making Up Your Mind Without Changing Your Mind, Too Much0
Reply to Breno Santos0
POLARIZATION MEASUREMENT, FIRST-PERSON AUTHORITY, AND POLITICAL MEANING in advance0
Reply to Charity Anderson0
Proper Social and Epistemic Expectations In Speech Exchange: Reply to Goldberg0
Reply to Dalmiya0
Descartes on the Unity of the Virtues0
Precis of Conversational Pressure0
Reliability, Accessibility, and Justified Credence0
Rights, Practical Deliberation, and Action0
Reasoning and Perceptual Foundationalism0
Entitled to Attention? Cooperativity, Context, and Standing0
Précis of Epistemic Care: Vulnerability, Inquiry, and Social Epistemology0
Replies to Vrinda Dalmiya and Stacey McElroy-Heltzel0
Still Pessimistic about First-Person Authority0
Integrity, Genericity, and the Limits of Reasons in advance0
Spinoza’s Special Distinctions0
Still Optimistic About First-person Authority0
Assessing the Structuralist Challenge to Vice Epistemology0
Cruelty, Sadism, and the Joy of Inflicting Pain for its Own Sake0
Must Love Arise Naturally?0
Unlucky on Twin Earth0
There Is Something to the Authority Thesis0
Perception, Justification, and Philosophical Truths0
Trust, Inquiry and Partiality: Comments on Goldberg’s Conversational Pressure0
Epistemic Normativity in Non-Ideal Worlds0
8-Tracks, The Demands of Gratitude and Harmonious Stews0
Does Knowledge Entail Justifications?0
The Abductive Method in Logic?0
Interesting Experiences0
The Moral Significance of Agent-Regret in advance0
Leibniz and the Status of Possible Worlds in advance0
Comments on Glasgow, The Solace0
Locke on Freedom and Freemen in the Two Treatises of Government0
Reimagining the Quality of Life0
Perception, Justification, and Knowledge0
But Do They Speak for Black People? Comments on Wendy Salkin’s Speaking for Others: The Ethics of Informal Political Representation0
The Solace0
Précis of Seeing, Knowing, and Doing: A Perceptualist Account0
0.10261106491089