Psychological Inquiry

Papers
(The TQCC of Psychological Inquiry is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Inductive Reasoning Model: A Step Forward into the Future or a Step Back into the Past?37
Inductive Reasoning Model32
On the Role of Metacognitive Beliefs and Experience With Internal and External Autobiographical Memory22
Unpacking the Emotional Black Box of the Affective Processes (ALPs) Model21
The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Highlighting Core Concepts and Potential Extensions15
Reply to Dahl: Moral Content is Varied, and Premature Definitions Should Not Constrain It11
Defining and Describing Morality: The View from Personality Psychology10
Strange Bedfellows and Their Irrational Pillow Talk9
Constructs in Psychology: Lessons from the Philosophy of Science8
Theory of Mind Research in Autism is Simply Hateful; “Pseudoscience” is Complicated7
What Are Constructs? Ontological Nature, Epistemological Challenges, Theoretical Foundations and Key Sources of Misunderstandings and Confusions6
Seven Grand Challenges for Evolutionary Political Psychology or: Political Ideologies as Ad-Hoc Alliances…So What?6
How Prevalent is Social Projection?4
Ideology as a Moral-Relational Language4
Bridges or Borders: The Geopolitics of Cross-Cultural Dynamics3
Focusing Inward: A Timely Yet Daunting Challenge for Clinical Psychological Science3
Who Needs to Define Morality, and Other Conversations3
A Call for Keeping Doors Open and for Parallel Efforts3
Toward a Parsimonious Framework for Understanding Emotional Reactions to Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures3
Beyond Identity: A Framework for the Study of Social Inequalities and Social Change3
The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Applying Appraisal Theories to Understand Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Conspiracy Theories3
Understanding Belief-Behavior Correspondence Requires More Conceptual Clarity3
Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model3
Why Some Inequalities Mobilize and Others Do Not2
Culture, Partisanship, and Signaling: The Social Nature of Political Belief Systems2
Reflections on the Difference Between Implicit Bias and Bias on Implicit Measures2
How Appraisal Model Allows to Distinguish Intergroup Conspiracy Theories from Other Forms of Hate Speech2
The “Implicit Bias” Wording Is a Relic. Let’s Move On and Study Unconscious Social Categorization Effects2
Mind the (Construct-Measurement) Gap2
Expanding the Borders of the Affective Learning Processes Model2
The AMCT and Conceptual Clarity2
Contextualizing Identities with Fundamental Inequalities: Commentary on “Beyond Identity: A Framework for the Study of Social Inequalities and Social Change”2
Working toward a Psychological Definition of Morality2
Do Autistic People Have Degrees of Disability in Theory of Mind? The Importance of Meta-Analytic Convergence2
The Future of Social Perception Models: Further Directions for Theoretical Development of the Inductive Reasoning Model2
Capitalism: The Unnamed Foundation of Social Inequality in Mainstream Psychological Research2
Autism, Theory of Mind, and the Dynamics of Value-Laden Research Programs2
Political Ideology is Not Meaningfully Explained by Alliances and is Not Inconsistent with Attitudinal Inconsistencies2
The Emotive Effects of Conspiracy Beliefs: More About Emotion and Motivation2
0.24745106697083