International Journal of Conflict Management

Papers
(The H4-Index of International Journal of Conflict Management is 15. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Ripeness obscured: inductive lessons from Türkiye’s (transactional) mediation in the Russia–Ukraine war45
The effects of ethnic conflict and foreign fighters on conflict duration: a statistical analysis35
An evaluation of a de-escalation conflict management training in a behavioral health hospital setting29
Interpersonal conflict as a barrier to task performance: the mediating role of workplace deviance and the moderating role of emotional intelligence28
Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management22
Having no negotiation power does not matter as long as you can think creatively: the moderating role of age21
How, when and why do negotiators use reference points? A qualitative interview study with negotiation practitioners21
The three–way interactions of gender, supervisor’s gender, and country on the strategies for managing conflict of millennials: an exploratory study in 10 countries20
Is abusive supervision always harmful toward creativity? Managing workplace stressors by promoting distributive and procedural justice20
Strategic adaptability in negotiation: a framework to distinguish strategic adaptable behaviors17
Organisational readiness for workplace bullying interventions: conceptualisation and measurement17
Why is a modest gentleman cruel and ruthless? A study on the dark side effect of humble leadership – from the perspective of low-status compensation theory17
Can loyal party members be flexible negotiators? Impacts of constituent support, term limits and bipartisan roles17
Justice in arbitration: the consumer perspective16
Individual differences, job demands and job resources as boundary conditions for relations between experienced incivility and forms of instigated incivility15
0.04096508026123