Journal of Medical Screening

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Medical Screening is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-02-01 to 2024-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
The impact of episodic screening interruption: COVID-19 and population-based cancer screening in Canada111
Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: A systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer41
Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on cervical cancer screening in the United States32
Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: Real-world data from a large cohort of older adults27
Google search volume trends for cancer screening terms during the COVID-19 pandemic20
COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England17
Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis rates: A rapid review and meta-analysis17
Incidence of inborn errors of metabolism detected by tandem mass spectrometry in China: A census of over seven million newborns between 2016 and 201715
Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers15
Interventions to ensure follow-up of positive fecal immunochemical tests: An international survey of screening programs14
Cervical screening attendance and cervical cancer risk among women who have sex with women14
The randomized trial of mammography screening that was not—A cautionary tale13
The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in London12
Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening12
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in a 13-year screening programme11
Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes11
Retrospective analysis of the effect on interval cancer rate of adding an artificial intelligence algorithm to the reading process for two-dimensional full-field digital mammography10
Modeling costs and benefits of the organized colorectal cancer screening programme and its potential future improvements in Hungary10
Folic acid and neural tube defects: Discovery, debate and the need for policy change10
Gender-specific cut-off levels in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: A population-based study of colonoscopy findings and costs10
Self-sampling for cervical screening offered at the point of invitation: A cross-sectional study of preferences in England10
Determination of methylmalonic acid, 2-methylcitric acid, and total homocysteine in dried blood spots by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: A reliable follow-up method for propionylcarnit9
Maximising the acceptability of extended time intervals between screens in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: An online experimental study9
Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Israel: Comprehensive multi-year assessment based on electronic medical records8
Decentralising atrial fibrillation screening to overcome socio-demographic inequalities in uptake in STROKESTOP II8
Factors associated with attendance and attendance patterns in a population-based mammographic screening program8
A novel mobile phone application for infant stool color recognition: An easy and effective tool to identify acholic stools in newborns8
All-cause mortality as the primary endpoint for the GRAIL/National Health Service England multi-cancer screening trial7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in an Iranian high-risk population7
Newborn screening for inherited metabolic diseases using tandem mass spectrometry in China: Outcome and cost–utility analysis7
Human papillomavirus self-sampling for long-term non-attenders in cervical cancer screening: A randomised feasibility study in Estonia7
Prioritisation of colonoscopy services in colorectal cancer screening programmes to minimise impact of COVID-19 pandemic on predicted cancer burden: A comparative modelling study7
Factors affecting patient adherence to lung cancer screening: A multisite analysis7
The UK National Screening Committee’s position on child–parent screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia7
Retrospective comparison between single reading plus an artificial intelligence algorithm and two-view digital tomosynthesis with double reading in breast screening6
Impact of an organised population screening programme for colorectal cancer: Measurement after first and second rounds5
Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis5
Prognostic selection and long-term survival analysis to assess overdiagnosis risk in lung cancer screening randomized trials5
Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer: A comparison of international guidelines on prostate-specific antigen testing5
Screening participants’ attitudes to the introduction of artificial intelligence in breast screening5
Afterthoughts on colonoscopy. Was it that bad?5
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening in New York City5
Faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer in a national screening programme5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?5
0.021606922149658