Journal of Medical Screening

Papers
(The H4-Index of Journal of Medical Screening is 11. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-07-01 to 2025-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Validation of a monoclonal unconjugated estriol antibody for use in prenatal maternal serum screening32
Aptima HPV E6/E7 mRNA and cytology cross-sectional performance as primary screening tests for detection of high-grade cervical lesions in HIV positive and negative women in South Africa30
Acceptability of alternative technologies compared with faecal immunochemical test and/or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review27
Simulated arbitration of discordance between radiologists and artificial intelligence interpretation of breast cancer screening mammograms21
Risk stratification in medical screening19
When primary prevention replaces screening15
Carrier rate of thalassemia among 25,910 high school students in Shaoguan area, China14
Interval cancers in a national colorectal screening programme based on faecal immunochemical testing: Implications for faecal haemoglobin concentration threshold and sex inequality13
Timely adherence to follow-up after high-risk lung cancer screenings13
Comparing screening based on the NHS Health Check and Polypill Prevention Programmes in the primary prevention of heart attacks and strokes12
Implementation of a centralized HPV-based cervical cancer screening programme in Tuscany: First round results and comparison with the foregoing Pap-based screening programme11
Applying the healthcare failure mode and effects analysis approach to improve the quality of an organised colorectal cancer screening programme11
Percentage mammographic density or absolute breast density for risk stratification in breast screening: Possible implications for socioeconomic health disparity11
Response to the letter: “Ethics of screening promotion: A slippery slope to forced marketing?”11
Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?11
0.062810182571411