Public Understanding of Science

Papers
(The median citation count of Public Understanding of Science is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
“It shouldn’t look aggressive”: How conceptions about publics shape the development of mining exploration technologies66
Going beyond political ideology: A computational analysis of civic trust in science40
Tensions in the public communication by scientists and scientific institutions: Sources, dimensions, and ways forward39
A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science37
Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era37
Who believes in science? A computational tool for identifying language invoking or disputing scientific knowledge32
Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception32
Contested science communication: Representations of scientists and their science in newspaper articles and the associated comment sections28
A four-level model of political polarization over science: Evidence from 10 European countries26
Online politicizations of science: Contestation versus denialism at the convergence between COVID-19 and climate science on Twitter26
Imagining the model citizen: A comparison between public understanding of science, public engagement in science, and citizen science23
Socio-economic status and authority deference: Understanding public (dis)engagement with science in Europe23
The plurivocal university: Typologizing the diverse voices of a research university on social media22
Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists’ biographies: Benevolence beliefs20
‘It’s just a Band-Aid!’: Public engagement with geoengineering and the politics of the climate crisis20
The effect of scientific conspiracy theories on scepticism towards biotechnologies20
Communicating uncertainties regarding COVID-19 vaccination: Moderating roles of trust in science, government, and society19
Bruce Lewenstein: ‘Our work is critical for the issues of the day . . . we must engage’19
‘Poetry under siege by rockets’: A case study of the creative and critical coverage by the New York Times of the 1969 Apollo 11 moonwalk19
On the verge between the scientific and the alternative: Swedish women’s claims about systemic side effects of the copper intrauterine device18
Explainable AI and trust: How news media shapes public support for AI-powered autonomous passenger drones18
How does the French press handle a controversial biotechnology? A psychosocial study of media coverage of human genome editing18
Narrativization of human population genetics: Two cases in Iceland and Russia18
More engagement but less participation: China’s alternative approach to public communication of science and technology17
Counteracting climate denial: A systematic review17
Partisanship and anti-elite worldviews as correlates of science and health beliefs in the multi-party system of Spain17
1992: The first issue of Public Understanding of Science16
The role of journalistic voice in communicating climate scepticism16
Book Review: Diarmid A. Finnegan, The Voice of Science: British Scientists on the Lecture Circuit in Gilded Age America16
Political ideology-driven perceptions of experts and their claims16
Children’s perceptions of scientists and their work: The ‘Draw a Scientist’ Test in the United Arab Emirates15
Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and U.S. public opinion about gene drive mosquitos15
Delineating between scientism and science enthusiasm: Challenges in measuring scientism and the development of novel scale14
Book review: Felicity Mellor (ed.), Insights on Science Journalism14
The legitimacy of science and the populist backlash: Cross-national and longitudinal trends and determinants of attitudes toward science14
Female expertise in public discourses: Visibility of female compared to male scientific experts in German media coverage of eight science-related issues14
The divide so wide: Public perspectives on the role of human genome editing in the US healthcare system14
The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media14
Comparing the influence of intellectual humility, religiosity, and political conservatism on vaccine attitudes in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom14
Of Issue Advocates and Honest Brokers: Participation of U.S. and German scientists in COVID-19 policy disputes13
Book review: Myrna Perez Criticizing Science: Stephen Jay Gould and the Struggle for American Democracy PerezMyrnaCriticizing Science: Stephen Jay Gould and the Struggle13
Book Review: Kristin Demetrious, Public Relations and Neoliberalism: The Language Practices of Knowledge Formation DemetriousKristinPublic Relations and Neoliberalism: The Language Practices of Knowle13
Moral expression of “experts” and public engagement: Communicating COVID-19 vaccines on Facebook public pages in Chinese13
The effects of self-disclosure and gender on a climate scientist’s credibility and likability on social media13
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media12
Book Review: Maya Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science Alex de Waal, New Pandemics, Old Politics: Two Hundred Years of War on Disease and Its Alternatives12
Follow the metrics? How does social media affect the journalistic practices of digital science communication start-ups?12
First-in-human gene therapy clinical trials in the media: Exploring patient narratives12
Examining science communication on Reddit: From an “Assembled” to a “Disassembling” approach12
Thank you reviewers12
Lay metrology and metroscoping: Towards the study of lay units11
Quality in science communication with communicative artificial intelligence: A principle-based framework11
What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education11
Climate and nature emergency: From scientists’ warnings to sufficient action11
Are we bad winners? Public understandings of the United Nations’ World Happiness Report among Finnish digital media and their readers11
A different image? Images of scientists in Chinese films11
Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?11
Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti)vaccination discourse in popular media11
Disseminating the Italian history of medicine: Arturo Castiglioni and his project at the University of Padua, 1933–194310
Democratising science in deliberative systems: Mobilising lay expertise against industry waste dumping in Taiwan10
Book review: John C. Besley and Anthony Dudo, Strategic Science Communication – A Guide to Setting the Right Objectives for more Effective Public Engagement10
In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change10
“We think this way as a society!”: Community-level science literacy among ultra-Orthodox Jews10
Thank you reviewers10
Why we need a Public Understanding of Social Science9
How do you argue with a science denial meme? Memed responses may be counter-productive for responding to science denial online9
Public perceptions of climate tipping points9
Book review: Pascal Hohaus (ed.), Science Communication in Times of Crisis9
The journalistic understanding of science as process and social system: A qualitative exploration in the German science journalism community9
From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism9
Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic9
The perception and use of generative AI for science-related information search: Insights from a cross-national study9
Climate change contrarian think tanks in Europe: A network analysis9
Examining a conceptual framework of aggressive and humorous styles in science YouTube videos about climate change and vaccination9
1796 – An Introduction to Botany : The critical role of women in eighteenth-century science popularisation and the early promotion of science for young girls in Britain9
Threatening experts: Correlates of viewing scientists as a social threat9
1999: The BBC simulates prehistoric wildlife9
Greenpeace and the online genetically modified food debate in the UK: The role of science and scientific evidence in ‘environmental representation’8
Guidance in the chaos: Effects of science communication by virologists during the COVID-19 crisis in Germany and the role of parasocial phenomena8
Brain-computer interfaces, disability, and the stigma of refusal: A factorial vignette study8
The health and environmental risks and rewards of modernity that shape scientific optimism8
Are science communication audiences becoming more critical? Reconstructing migration between audience segments based on Swiss panel data8
Book review: John L. Rudolph Why We Teach Science (and Why We Should) RudolphJohn L.Why We Teach Science (and Why We Should). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 224 8
Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada8
Perceptions of policy problems and solutions: Climate change and structural racism8
Positions on science and religious beliefs across societies: Development of a research instrument and testing of its validity among high school students8
Deliberating enhanced weathering: Public frames, iconic ecosystems and the governance of carbon removal at scale7
The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries7
Seduction, caution, fight: Media framing of research-based expertise in Norwegian print media coverage of low energy buildings (2005–2012)7
Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review7
Martin W. Bauer: ‘“Truth-value” is not the only criterion of validity, there is also the felicity of performative knowledge claims . . .’7
The translator versus the critic: A flawed dichotomy in the age of misinformation7
Advocacy – defending science or destroying it? Interviews with 47 climate scientists about their fundamental concerns7
Academic excellence and community relevance: Can we have it all?7
Audience segmentation analysis of public intentions to get a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia6
Fiction references as framing devices in extended reality news discourse6
Contesting state expertise after COVID-196
Effects of epistemic beliefs, science populism, and social media use on climate change misperceptions6
The acceptance of evolution: A developmental view of Generation X in the United States6
Book review: Sarah R. Davies, Science Societies: Resources for Life in a Technoscientific World DaviesSarah R.Science Societies: Resources for Life in a 6
Book Review: Suzanne Simard, Finding the Mother Tree: Uncovering the Wisdom and Intelligence of the Forest6
Lucy as “one of us”: Public misconception, national narrative, and the scientific evidence about Australopithecus afarensis in Ethiopia6
Public understanding of science and technology in the Internet era6
Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media6
Richard S. Ellis, When Galaxies Were Born: The Quest for Cosmic Dawn6
Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: Examining the role of trust in science6
David S. Caudill, Expertise in Crisis: The Ideological Contours of Public Scientific Controversies6
Selected by expertise? Scientific experts in German news coverage of COVID-19 compared to other pandemics6
The invisible frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining sourcing and the underrepresentation of female expertise in pandemic news coverage6
Narratives of hope and concern? Examining the impact of climate scientists’ communication on credibility and engagement5
‘Ugly and smelly or useful insect hunters?’ Perceptions of and attitudes towards bats in the turn of the twentieth-century public sphere in Barcelona5
Science as the raison d’etat: Nehruvian scientism and the Indian science museum5
Fuelling the climate and science ‘denial machine’ on social media: A case study of the Great Barrier Reef’s 2021 ‘in danger’ recommendation on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook5
Predictors of young people’s anti-vaccine attitudes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic5
Why do experts disagree? The development of a taxonomy5
Book review: Jean Paul Bertemes, Serge Haan and Dirk Hans (eds), 50 Essentials on Science Communication (co-created by the University of Luxembourg and the Luxembourg National Research Fund)5
Imagined futures for livestock gene editing: Public engagement in the Netherlands5
Tragic Flaws and Practical Wisdom: Public reasoning behind preferences for different genetic technologies5
Breeding by intervening: Exploring the role of associations and deliberation in consumer acceptance of different breeding techniques5
Christianity-science compatibility beliefs increase nonreligious individuals’ perceptions of Christians’ intelligence and scientific ability5
Work and the public understanding of science5
Mindful mindfulness reporting: Media portrayals of scientific evidence for meditation mobile apps5
Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies5
Trust, experience, and innovation: Key factors shaping American attitudes about AI4
Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic4
Dealing with dissent from the medical ranks: Public health authorities and COVID-19 communication4
Looking back and looking ahead4
The public you want, the public you get: Exploring the relationship between the public and science in the debate on xenotransplantation4
Between data providers and concerned citizens: Exploring participation in precision public health in Switzerland4
Scientists’ public engagement goals: Perceived importance and personal prioritization4
What if some people just do not like science? How personality traits relate to attitudes toward science and technology4
Natural history museum visitors’ use of key concepts and misconceptions in written explanations of evolutionary scenarios4
Thirty years of science–society interfaces: What’s next?4
Are plain language summaries more readable than scientific abstracts? Evidence from six biomedical and life sciences journals4
A 30-nation investigation of lay heritability beliefs4
Autonomy and bioethics in fan responses to Orphan Black4
Science on the mind: Examining question ordering effects when asking about science on large-scale surveys4
European journalists and the sea: Contexts, motivations, and difficulties4
Book review essay: Digging deep into stories in science communication3
How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape “post-pandemic” environmental opinion3
“That was not the discussion we wanted to have”: Engagement of civil society organizations with synthetic biology3
A matter of right or wrong: Divisive attributes of moralized science and technology attitudes3
Feminist retroviruses to white Sharia: Gender “science fan fiction” on 4Chan3
Stereotypes and social evaluations of scientists are related to different antecedents and outcomes3
STS and science communication: Reflecting on a relationship3
How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments3
Ethics, generative AI and science communication3
Thank you reviewers3
Can homeopathy cure all diseases? Subgroups of homeopathy users based on beliefs about whether and how homeopathy should be used to treat serious conditions3
Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science3
Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news3
Book Review: The Many Voices of Modern Physics: Written Communication Practices of Key Discoveries3
Science capital: Results from a Finnish population survey3
Book Review: Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench (eds), Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology3
Mapping pathways to public understanding of climate science3
Associations of locus of control, information processing style and anti-reflexivity with climate change scepticism in an Australian sample3
0.10266494750977