Research Evaluation

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Evaluation is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-07-01 to 2024-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)60
What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A systematic review40
No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic39
The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods39
What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany36
Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research29
On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact26
Funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: A literature review20
The role of metrics in peer assessments18
Does government support of a few leading universities have a broader impact on the higher education system? Evaluation of the Russian University Excellence Initiative17
Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review17
A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies16
Assessing research excellence: Evaluating the Research Excellence Framework15
The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output: A comparison between China and the EU15
Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: Concepts and considerations14
Capabilities for transdisciplinary research14
Does reviewing experience reduce disagreement in proposals evaluation? Insights from Marie Skłodowska-Curie and COST Actions12
How far does an emphasis on stakeholder engagement and co-production in research present a threat to academic identity and autonomy? A prospective study across five European countries12
Spreading the gospel: Legitimating university rankings as boundary work11
An exploration of referees’ comments published in open peer review journals: The characteristics of review language and the association between review scrutiny and citations11
Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices10
Beyond bean counting: Is the policy effective for the innovation efficiency of wind power industry in China?10
The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spain’s philosophical scholarship: An analysis of researchers’ perceptions10
Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review9
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery9
Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions9
Peer review in funding-by-lottery: A systematic overview and expansion9
How to evaluateex anteimpact of funding proposals? An analysis of reviewers’ comments on impact statements8
Toward a modular evaluation approach of real-world laboratories: Findings from a literature review8
Societal targeting in researcher funding: An exploratory approach8
The use of an impact framework to evaluate the impact of research on policy and practice: Screening questionnaires for intellectual disability8
The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations8
Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking8
Biographical representation, from narrative to list: The evolution of curricula vitae in the humanities, 1950 to 20107
Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?7
Measuring societal impact of research—Developing and validating an impact instrument for occupational health and safety7
Affective auditing: The emotional weight of the research excellence framework6
Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluation6
SSH researchers make an impact differently. Looking at public research from the perspective of users6
Estimating the effects of public subsidies on the performance of supported enterprises across firm sizes6
Competitive exposure and existential recognition: Visibility and legitimacy on academic social networking sites5
Mirror, mirror on the wall: is economics the fairest of them all? An investigation into the social sciences and humanities in Vietnam5
Making the cut: How panel reviewers use evaluation devices to select applications at the European Research Council5
Valorization of transdisciplinary research: An evaluation approach and empirical illustration5
Systematizing societal effects of transdisciplinary research5
Evaluating socially engaged climate research: Scientists’ visions of a climate resilient U.S. Southwest5
Valuation regimes in academia: Researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance4
Enriching research quality: A proposition for stakeholder heterogeneity4
Interdisciplinary research and policy impacts: Assessing the significance of knowledge coproduction4
Transformative academic institutions: An experimental framework for understanding regional impacts of research4
Understanding collaborative interactions in relation to research impact in social sciences and humanities: A meta-ethnography4
Gender diversity and publication activity—an analysis of STEM in the UK4
Quantifying the contributions technicians make to research3
Does monitoring performance act as an incentive for improving research performance? National and organizational level analysis of Finnish universities3
Explaining employment sector choices of doctoral graduates in Germany3
The missing links of research impact3
Research calls, competition for funding and inefficiency3
Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations3
Does R&D tax credit impact firm behaviour? Micro evidence for Portugal3
An openness framework for ex ante evaluation of societal impact of research3
The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding3
Looking for evidence of research impact and use: A qualitative study of an Australian research-policy system3
Evidence of research mastery: How applicants argue the feasibility of their research projects3
Expression of concern: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)3
Devices of evaluation: Institutionalization and impact—Introduction to the special issue3
Researcher experiences in practice-based interdisciplinary research3
Mergers and acquisitions in the public research sector. Toward a comprehensive typology2
Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience2
Research impact as understood by two funders of agricultural research in South Africa2
What makes databases tick: Logics that underpin national databases for research output in Europe2
Assessment practices of community-engaged institutions in the USA: Common claims and uncertain methods2
Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health clinical trial definition impact on recruitment progress2
The effect of facilitating interdisciplinary cooperation on the research productivity of university research teams: The moderating role of government assistance2
The impact of Italian performance-based research funding systems on the intensity of international research collaboration2
University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact2
Heterogeneous impacts of research grant funding2
The epistemic, production, and accountability prospects of social impact: An analysis of strategic research proposals2
Theory of systems change: An initial, middle-range theory of public health research impact2
Under pressure: The extent and distribution of perceived pressure among scientists in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland2
Assessing the variety of collaborative practices in translational research: An analysis of scientists’ ego-networks2
The systemic approach as an instrument to evaluate higher education systems: Opportunities and challenges2
Documenting development of interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers by visualizing connections2
Proposed methodology for measuring the effectiveness of policies designed to further research2
Changing conceptualization of innovation in the European Union and its impact on universities: Critical junctures and evolving institutional demands2
Research governance and the dynamics of science: A framework for the study of governance effects on research fields2
Evaluation of rice research: An alternate method to capture outcomes2
Promoting narrative CVs to improve research evaluation? A review of opinion pieces and experiments2
The forms of societal interaction in the social sciences, humanities and arts: Below the tip of the iceberg2
ASIRPAReal-Time in the making or how to empower researchers to steer research towards desired societal goals2
Evaluation of the arts in performance-based research funding systems: An international perspective2
A Research Pathway Model for evaluating the implementation of practice-based research: The case of self-management health innovations2
From intent to impact—The decline of broader impacts throughout an NSF project life cycle2
Lessons from mixed-method evaluations—An example from labor market research1
Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review1
Assessing university policies for enhancing societal impact of academic research: A multicriteria mapping approach1
The program and policy change framework: A new tool to measure research use in low- and middle-income countries1
Using theory to understand how policy change happens: Insights from agricultural research for development1
Turning academics into researchers: The development of National Researcher Categorization Systems in Latin America1
The legal foundation of responsible research assessment: An overview on European Union and Italy1
Public research funding and science-based innovation: An analysis of ERC research grants, publications and patents1
Boundary-work and social closure in academic recruitment: Insights from the transdisciplinary subject area Swedish as a Second Language1
Using the catastrophe theory to discover transformative research topics1
Globalization of scientific communication: Evidence from authors in academic journals by country of origin1
Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review1
Correction to: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)1
The effect of applied research institutes on invention: Evidence from the Fraunhofer centres in Europe1
‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure1
Improving universities’ activities in academic startup support through public interventions: The effectiveness of the German programme ‘EXIST—leverage of potentials’1
Exploring European-funded project-based networks in ICT and their links with regional total factor productivity: The FP7 and the CIP1
Pathway profiles: Learning from five main approaches to assessing interdisciplinarity1
Effects of transdisciplinary research on scientific knowledge and reflexivity1
Practicing responsible research assessment: Qualitative study of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure assessments in the United States1
Teachers conceptualizing and developing assessment for skill development: Trialing a maker assessment framework1
How can societally-targeted research funding shape researcher networks and practices?1
Key factors affecting the promotion of researchers of the Argentine Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET)1
A participatory approach to tracking system transformation in clusters and innovation ecosystems—Evolving practice in Sweden’s Vinnväxt programme1
The conflict of impact for early career researchers planning for a future in the academy1
Prestige of scholarly book publishers—An investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries1
Research impact seen from the user side1
Aggregate level research governance effects on particle physics: A comparative analysis1
When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout1
S&T resource allocation considering both performance and potential: The case of Chinese research institutes1
Efficiency of research in various fields: Evidence from Indonesia1
Devices of future excellence: Detaching excellence recognition from ‘eminent men’1
Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices1
Measuring the effects of the social rural university campus1
The funding and research trends in library and information science of NSSFC: Comparison of awards and papers1
Predicting funded research project performance based on machine learning1
The Corona-Eye: Exploring the risks of COVID-19 on fair assessments of impact for REF20211
Research and the real world: Analyzing the short- and long-term impact of knowledge transfer1
Being a female academic under neoliberal evaluation: A systematic review1
0.023521900177002