Research Evaluation

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Evaluation is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)48
No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic37
What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A systematic review32
The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods32
Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda30
What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany26
Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research25
On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact23
Funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: A literature review17
The role of metrics in peer assessments16
Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review15
Does government support of a few leading universities have a broader impact on the higher education system? Evaluation of the Russian University Excellence Initiative14
The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output: A comparison between China and the EU14
Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study13
A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies13
Capabilities for transdisciplinary research13
Assessing research excellence: Evaluating the Research Excellence Framework13
Fast growth of the number of proceedings papers in atypical fields in the Czech Republic is a likely consequence of the national performance-based research funding system12
How far does an emphasis on stakeholder engagement and co-production in research present a threat to academic identity and autonomy? A prospective study across five European countries11
An exploration of referees’ comments published in open peer review journals: The characteristics of review language and the association between review scrutiny and citations11
Does reviewing experience reduce disagreement in proposals evaluation? Insights from Marie Skłodowska-Curie and COST Actions11
Beyond bean counting: Is the policy effective for the innovation efficiency of wind power industry in China?10
Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: Concepts and considerations10
Spreading the gospel: Legitimating university rankings as boundary work9
Determinants of quality of research environment: An assessment of the environment submissions in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework in 20149
Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices8
DARE to be different? A novel approach for analysing diversity in collaborative research projects8
Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking8
The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations7
How to evaluateex anteimpact of funding proposals? An analysis of reviewers’ comments on impact statements7
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery7
Biographical representation, from narrative to list: The evolution of curricula vitae in the humanities, 1950 to 20107
The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spain’s philosophical scholarship: An analysis of researchers’ perceptions7
Measuring societal impact of research—Developing and validating an impact instrument for occupational health and safety7
Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?7
Peer review in funding-by-lottery: A systematic overview and expansion7
The use of an impact framework to evaluate the impact of research on policy and practice: Screening questionnaires for intellectual disability6
Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions5
SSH researchers make an impact differently. Looking at public research from the perspective of users5
Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluation5
Estimating the effects of public subsidies on the performance of supported enterprises across firm sizes5
Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review5
Societal targeting in researcher funding: An exploratory approach5
Transformative academic institutions: An experimental framework for understanding regional impacts of research4
Interdisciplinary research and policy impacts: Assessing the significance of knowledge coproduction4
Affective auditing: The emotional weight of the research excellence framework4
Understanding collaborative interactions in relation to research impact in social sciences and humanities: A meta-ethnography4
Mirror, mirror on the wall: is economics the fairest of them all? An investigation into the social sciences and humanities in Vietnam4
A register of public-sector research organizations as a tool for research policy studies and evaluation3
The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding3
Evidence of research mastery: How applicants argue the feasibility of their research projects3
Does R&D tax credit impact firm behaviour? Micro evidence for Portugal3
Enriching research quality: A proposition for stakeholder heterogeneity3
Devices of evaluation: Institutionalization and impact—Introduction to the special issue3
Valorization of transdisciplinary research: An evaluation approach and empirical illustration3
Evaluating socially engaged climate research: Scientists’ visions of a climate resilient U.S. Southwest3
Explaining employment sector choices of doctoral graduates in Germany3
Making the cut: How panel reviewers use evaluation devices to select applications at the European Research Council3
Systematizing societal effects of transdisciplinary research3
Quantifying the contributions technicians make to research3
Gender diversity and publication activity—an analysis of STEM in the UK3
Expression of concern: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)3
Assessment practices of community-engaged institutions in the USA: Common claims and uncertain methods2
Documenting development of interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers by visualizing connections2
University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact2
Toward a modular evaluation approach of real-world laboratories: Findings from a literature review2
An openness framework for ex ante evaluation of societal impact of research2
Heterogeneous impacts of research grant funding2
Valuation regimes in academia: Researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance2
What makes databases tick: Logics that underpin national databases for research output in Europe2
The effect of facilitating interdisciplinary cooperation on the research productivity of university research teams: The moderating role of government assistance2
How to select the best: Selection procedures of innovation agencies2
The impact of Italian performance-based research funding systems on the intensity of international research collaboration2
Proposed methodology for measuring the effectiveness of policies designed to further research2
Mergers and acquisitions in the public research sector. Toward a comprehensive typology2
Competitive exposure and existential recognition: Visibility and legitimacy on academic social networking sites2
Evaluation of rice research: An alternate method to capture outcomes2
Researcher experiences in practice-based interdisciplinary research2
A superb example of policy evaluation2
Does monitoring performance act as an incentive for improving research performance? National and organizational level analysis of Finnish universities2
Evaluation of the arts in performance-based research funding systems: An international perspective2
Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience2
Research impact as understood by two funders of agricultural research in South Africa2
Looking for evidence of research impact and use: A qualitative study of an Australian research-policy system2
The forms of societal interaction in the social sciences, humanities and arts: Below the tip of the iceberg1
Teachers conceptualizing and developing assessment for skill development: Trialing a maker assessment framework1
From intent to impact—The decline of broader impacts throughout an NSF project life cycle1
The funding and research trends in library and information science of NSSFC: Comparison of awards and papers1
Research and the real world: Analyzing the short- and long-term impact of knowledge transfer1
Research governance and the dynamics of science: A framework for the study of governance effects on research fields1
When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout1
Promoting narrative CVs to improve research evaluation? A review of opinion pieces and experiments1
The Corona-Eye: Exploring the risks of COVID-19 on fair assessments of impact for REF20211
The effect of applied research institutes on invention: Evidence from the Fraunhofer centres in Europe1
The program and policy change framework: A new tool to measure research use in low- and middle-income countries1
Exploring European-funded project-based networks in ICT and their links with regional total factor productivity: The FP7 and the CIP1
Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations1
ASIRPAReal-Time in the making or how to empower researchers to steer research towards desired societal goals1
Using the catastrophe theory to discover transformative research topics1
A Research Pathway Model for evaluating the implementation of practice-based research: The case of self-management health innovations1
Changing conceptualization of innovation in the European Union and its impact on universities: Critical junctures and evolving institutional demands1
Being a female academic under neoliberal evaluation: A systematic review1
The epistemic, production, and accountability prospects of social impact: An analysis of strategic research proposals1
The missing links of research impact1
Research calls, competition for funding and inefficiency1
Globalization of scientific communication: Evidence from authors in academic journals by country of origin1
Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review1
Using theory to understand how policy change happens: Insights from agricultural research for development1
Pathway profiles: Learning from five main approaches to assessing interdisciplinarity1
The systemic approach as an instrument to evaluate higher education systems: Opportunities and challenges1
Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health clinical trial definition impact on recruitment progress1
Predicting funded research project performance based on machine learning1
Boundary-work and social closure in academic recruitment: Insights from the transdisciplinary subject area Swedish as a Second Language1
A participatory approach to tracking system transformation in clusters and innovation ecosystems—Evolving practice in Sweden’s Vinnväxt programme1
Correction to: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)1
Under pressure: The extent and distribution of perceived pressure among scientists in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland1
Theory of systems change: An initial, middle-range theory of public health research impact1
Key factors affecting the promotion of researchers of the Argentine Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET)1
Lessons from mixed-method evaluations—An example from labor market research1
The conflict of impact for early career researchers planning for a future in the academy1
‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure1
S&T resource allocation considering both performance and potential: The case of Chinese research institutes1
Assessing the variety of collaborative practices in translational research: An analysis of scientists’ ego-networks1
0.047897100448608