Research Evaluation

Papers
(The H4-Index of Research Evaluation is 13. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Globalization of scientific communication: Evidence from authors in academic journals by country of origin36
How bibliometric evaluation makes the academia an ‘Iron Cage’: Evidence from Chinese academics32
Towards a sustainable and responsible model for monitoring open science and research—analysis of the Finnish model for monitoring open science and research21
Competitive performativity of academic social networks: the subjectivation of competition on ResearchGate21
Do thematic funding instruments lead researchers in new directions? Strategic funding priorities and topic switching among British grant recipients19
Cross-sectional analysis of self-promotional language in texts of grant proposals across gender17
Enriching research quality: A proposition for stakeholder heterogeneity17
A Research Pathway Model for evaluating the implementation of practice-based research: The case of self-management health innovations16
Simultaneous submissions without simultaneous peer review15
Can talent policy promote green technology innovation?14
The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spain’s philosophical scholarship: An analysis of researchers’ perceptions14
How impact-focused funding influences researchers’ knowledge mobilization activities14
One size fits all? A comparative review of policy-making in the area of research impact evaluation in the UK, Poland and Norway14
Tilting at twin windmills: On article quotas and journal impact factors13
When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout13
Evaluation of economic incentives for Chinese university patent transfers: Is increasing the inventor share rate more effective?13
Research impact seen from the user side13
Correction to: Stated preference methods and STI policy studies: a foreground approach13
2.4743320941925