Utilitas

Papers
(The TQCC of Utilitas is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
A Letter from the New Editor10
A Philosophical Metabolism Problem: Undermining of Egoistic Reasons10
Harm-Benefit Analysis for Animal Experiments Is Not Utilitarian10
The Decline of Egoism10
Garrett Cullity, Concern, Respect, and Cooperation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 326.7
Precious Goods6
Jeanine M. Grenberg, Kant’s Deontological Eudaemonism: The Dutiful Pursuit of Virtue and Happiness (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xii + 414.4
Family and Moderation in Locke’s State of Nature3
Superiority Discounting Implies the Preposterous Conclusion3
UTI volume 34 issue 4 Cover and Back matter3
Egalitarianism across Generations3
Troubled Hedonism and Social Justice: Mill and the Epicureans on the Ataraxic Life3
John Stuart Mill's Passage on Pimps and the Limits on Free Speech3
Degrees and Demands3
What if We Contain Multiple Morally Relevant Subjects?3
Christopher Woodard, Taking Utilitarianism Seriously (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xii + 217.3
Three Forms of Actualist Direct Consequentialism2
Roger Crisp, Sacrifice Regained: Morality and Self-Interest in British Moral Philosophy from Hobbes to Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2019), pp. x + 233.2
Absolute Fairness and Weighted Lotteries2
The Prospects for ‘Prospect Utilitarianism’2
What Is the Point of a Duty of Beneficence? Reevaluating Taurek2
Reply to Jay on Subjective Consequentialism and Deontic Variance2
The Subjectivity Argument against the Intrinsic Value of Pleasure2
Michael Quinn, Bentham (Cambridge and Medford: Polity Press, 2022), pp. x + 218.2
A Thomistic Solution to the Deep Problem for Perfectionism2
A Less Bad Theory of the Procreation Asymmetry and the Non-Identity Problem2
Some Acts Really Harm: A Defense of the Standard Account versus Norcross's Contextualism2
In Defence of Pigou–Dalton for Chances1
How Should Risk and Ambiguity Affect Our Charitable Giving?1
Ben Bramble & James Lenman, Should We Maximize Utility? A Debate about Utilitarianism (Abingdon, Routledge, 2025), pp. xviii + 224.1
Rule Consequentialism and Demandingness: The Wrong Solution(s)?1
Posthumous Harm and Changing Desires1
Tim Mulgan , Philosophy for an Ending World (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2024), pp. xxxiv + 292.1
Douglas Portmore, Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xvii + 324.1
Dead Sea Apple Cases of Disappointment1
Bigoted Insults, Harm, and the Intentional Infliction of Pain: A Reply to Bell1
Reciprocity, Inequality, and Unsuccessful Rescues1
The Disjunctive Repugnant Conclusion1
Shelly Kagan, Answering Moral Skepticism (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. xiv + 392.1
Should the Numbers Count for Taurek?1
Moral Significance and Overpermissiveness1
Helen McCabe, John Stuart Mill, Socialist (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2021), pp. 368.1
Clifford's Consequentialism1
Sidgwick’s Critique of Deontology: Scrupulous Fairness or Serpent-Windings?1
Trivially Satisfied Desires: A Problem for Desire-Satisfaction Theories of Well-Being1
A Letter from the Editor1
David Boonin, Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xii + 209.1
Harm, Failing to Benefit, and the Counterfactual Comparative Account1
0.078260898590088