Utilitas

Papers
(The TQCC of Utilitas is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-07-01 to 2026-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
A Philosophical Metabolism Problem: Undermining of Egoistic Reasons11
A Letter from the New Editor10
Harm-Benefit Analysis for Animal Experiments Is Not Utilitarian10
The Decline of Egoism10
Garrett Cullity, Concern, Respect, and Cooperation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 326.8
Precious Goods6
Jeanine M. Grenberg, Kant’s Deontological Eudaemonism: The Dutiful Pursuit of Virtue and Happiness (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xii + 414.4
Family and Moderation in Locke’s State of Nature4
Egalitarianism across Generations3
Christopher Woodard, Taking Utilitarianism Seriously (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xii + 217.3
John Stuart Mill's Passage on Pimps and the Limits on Free Speech3
Degrees and Demands3
Superiority Discounting Implies the Preposterous Conclusion3
What if We Contain Multiple Morally Relevant Subjects?3
Troubled Hedonism and Social Justice: Mill and the Epicureans on the Ataraxic Life3
UTI volume 34 issue 4 Cover and Back matter3
Trivially Satisfied Desires: A Problem for Desire-Satisfaction Theories of Well-Being2
Three Forms of Actualist Direct Consequentialism2
Some Acts Really Harm: A Defense of the Standard Account versus Norcross's Contextualism2
Absolute Fairness and Weighted Lotteries2
Shelly Kagan, Answering Moral Skepticism (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. xiv + 392.2
The Prospects for ‘Prospect Utilitarianism’2
What Is the Point of a Duty of Beneficence? Reevaluating Taurek2
Roger Crisp, Sacrifice Regained: Morality and Self-Interest in British Moral Philosophy from Hobbes to Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2019), pp. x + 233.2
The Subjectivity Argument against the Intrinsic Value of Pleasure2
Reply to Jay on Subjective Consequentialism and Deontic Variance2
Michael Quinn, Bentham (Cambridge and Medford: Polity Press, 2022), pp. x + 218.2
A Thomistic Solution to the Deep Problem for Perfectionism2
A Less Bad Theory of the Procreation Asymmetry and the Non-Identity Problem2
The Disjunctive Repugnant Conclusion1
Sidgwick’s Critique of Deontology: Scrupulous Fairness or Serpent-Windings?1
Reciprocity, Inequality, and Unsuccessful Rescues1
Douglas Portmore, Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xvii + 324.1
Dead Sea Apple Cases of Disappointment1
Should the Numbers Count for Taurek?1
Rule Consequentialism and Demandingness: The Wrong Solution(s)?1
Tim Mulgan , Philosophy for an Ending World (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2024), pp. xxxiv + 292.1
Posthumous Harm and Changing Desires1
In Defence of Pigou–Dalton for Chances1
Moral Significance and Overpermissiveness1
Helen McCabe, John Stuart Mill, Socialist (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2021), pp. 368.1
Ben Bramble & James Lenman, Should We Maximize Utility? A Debate about Utilitarianism (Abingdon, Routledge, 2025), pp. xviii + 224.1
Mill’s Aesthetic Action: A Reconceptualization as World-Regarding Action1
Longtermism, Technology, and Well-Being1
How Should Risk and Ambiguity Affect Our Charitable Giving?1
Harm, Failing to Benefit, and the Counterfactual Comparative Account1
David Boonin, Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. xii + 209.1
0.35667014122009