Learned Publishing

Papers
(The TQCC of Learned Publishing is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic118
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing90
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities89
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year89
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions85
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies56
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence53
38
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202231
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms31
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers29
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view29
Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran27
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers23
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar21
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science20
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 119
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study18
Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force f16
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications16
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review14
Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles?13
Issue Information13
Issue Information12
12
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks12
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication12
Issue Information12
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations12
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain11
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses11
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction11
Correction to “Data Availability Statements in Mega Journals: A Comparative Analysis of Global and Korea‐Affiliated Publications in Health and Medical Research”10
Issue Information10
Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews10
Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective9
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing9
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI9
Towards a DOI ‐First Referencing Model: Opportunities, Limitations and Implications for Scholarly Publishing9
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals8
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility8
Issue Information8
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher8
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record8
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives8
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change8
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings8
Correction to “ DeepGreen —A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”8
8
8
Do you still need to make that trip?8
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing8
Creating Onomastic Social Network Maps of Books Using Their Indexes. Case Study: ‘Papyrus: The Invention of Books in the Ancient World’7
Beyond the Map: Considering Reporting Quality to Strengthen Scoping Reviews7
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications7
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change7
Who Owns the Argument? A Practical Test for Author Responsibility in AI ‐Assisted Scholarly Writing7
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter7
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?7
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
7
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership6
From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh6
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers6
Do Early Career Researchers Consider AI as an Opportunity or a Threat? A Pathfinding Study6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review6
COI Declaration Policy in Medical Journals: From Authors to Editors6
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills5
After the Wow: Building Reliability in GenAI ‐Era Scholarly Publishing5
Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies5
Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?5
The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale5
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles5
Enhancing Consistency in Peer Review: A Statistical Analysis of Discrepancies and Proposals for Improvement5
Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem5
Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape5
What Happens After Rejection? Making Invisible Peer Review Visible5
Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis5
Toward Science‐Led Publishing5
Review of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications' ‘Toolkits for Equity’5
1.528578042984