Learned Publishing

Papers
(The TQCC of Learned Publishing is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic106
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing82
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year80
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence75
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities75
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies50
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions46
35
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms30
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202229
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view28
Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran26
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers25
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar23
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications22
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science21
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers19
Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force f19
Issue Information18
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 117
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study17
Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles?16
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review16
Issue Information14
Issue Information13
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks13
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication12
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses12
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction12
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations12
11
Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews11
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals11
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain11
Issue Information11
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers10
Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective10
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI10
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing9
Towards a DOI ‐First Referencing Model: Opportunities, Limitations and Implications for Scholarly Publishing9
9
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals8
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing8
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change8
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record8
Issue Information8
Do you still need to make that trip?8
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change8
Correction to “ DeepGreen —A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”8
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility8
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher8
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review7
An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications7
Issue Information7
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives7
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings7
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?7
Beyond the Map: Considering Reporting Quality to Strengthen Scoping Reviews7
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
7
7
Creating Onomastic Social Network Maps of Books Using Their Indexes. Case Study: ‘Papyrus: The Invention of Books in the Ancient World’7
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications6
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter6
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship6
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers6
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership6
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh6
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review6
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing6
Enhancing Consistency in Peer Review: A Statistical Analysis of Discrepancies and Proposals for Improvement6
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills6
0.079008102416992