Learned Publishing

Papers
(The TQCC of Learned Publishing is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence73
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions64
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities64
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic54
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing48
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year39
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies26
26
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms24
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers24
Public access policy in the United States: Impact of the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable23
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202223
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view22
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 122
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers22
Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force for Good’21
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar21
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science18
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review16
Issue Information15
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study15
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications15
Issue Information14
Issue Information14
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations13
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks13
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain12
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses12
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals11
Thanking our reviewers 202111
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction11
Issue Information11
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication11
11
Scholarly journal publishing in Australia11
Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective9
Correction to “DeepGreen—A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”9
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI9
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers9
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record8
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility8
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing8
Issue Information8
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings8
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals8
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review8
8
Do you still need to make that trip?7
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change7
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher7
Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy?7
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?6
Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma6
An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications6
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter6
From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh6
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review6
Issue Information6
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives6
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing6
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications6
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing6
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers6
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media6
Creating Onomastic Social Network Maps of Books Using Their Indexes. Case Study: ‘Papyrus: The Invention of Books in the Ancient World’6
6
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership6
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change6
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills5
Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis5
Toward Science‐Led Publishing5
Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?5
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers5
Issue Information5
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles5
Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape5
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research5
Review of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications' ‘Toolkits for Equity’5
The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale5
Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem5
0.095959901809692