Learned Publishing

Papers
(The median citation count of Learned Publishing is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access?42
Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers33
Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID‐19 research papers29
Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus24
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness23
Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis19
Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill18
The prevalence and impact of special issues in communications journals 2015–201917
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review17
Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects17
Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID‐19 crisis16
Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles16
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills15
Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences15
Human‐ and AI‐based authorship: Principles and ethics15
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought14
Journal hijacking: Challenges and potential solutions14
Standardizing terminology for text recycling in research writing14
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles14
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review13
Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors13
Improving peer‐review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy13
Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers13
Fear of the academic fake? Journal editorials and the amplification of the 'predatory publishing' discourse13
Journal self‐citation trends in 1975–2017 and the effect on journal impact and article citations13
Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects12
Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction11
Titles in research articles: Changes across time and discipline11
Plain language summaries: Enabling increased diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in scholarly publishing11
Knowledge production on predatory publishing: A systematic review11
The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals11
Perspectives on institutional valuing and support for academic and translational outputs in Japan and Australia10
Scholarly journal publishing standards, policies and guidelines10
Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation10
Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo‐Ukrainian war9
Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact9
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers9
The future of scientific journals: The rise of UniAI9
Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals9
Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits8
Scholarly journal publishing in Australia8
Enter the dragon: China and global academic publishing8
Why do journals discontinue? A study of Australian ceased journals8
Publication practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?8
Adopting open access in an emerging country: Is gender inequality a barrier in humanities and social sciences?8
The impact of COVID‐19 on the UK publishing industry: Findings and opportunity8
Home country bias in academic publishing: A case study of the New England Journal of Medicine8
Journal editors and journal indexes: Internationalization pressures in the semi‐periphery of the world of science7
Expanding Nature: Product line and brand extensions of a scientific journal7
University presses and the impact of COVID‐197
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers7
Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy—A case study in the earth and environmental sciences7
Politics matters: The power dynamics behind Chinese English‐language humanities and social science journals7
Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields7
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals6
COVID‐19 Rapid Review cross‐publisher initiative: What we have learned and what we are going to do next6
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers6
Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma6
The AMSTAR‐2 critical appraisal tool and editorial decision‐making for systematic reviews: Retrospective, bibliometric study6
Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results6
Objectivity of the peer‐review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies5
Authors' choice between parent and mirror journals of Elsevier5
Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review5
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies5
Do graphical abstracts on a publisher's official website have an effect on articles' usage and citations? A propensity score matching analysis5
Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers5
An analysis of journalism articles achieving high Altmetric attention scores5
The two faces of the corresponding author and the need to separate them5
Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates5
ORCID growth and field‐wise dynamics of adoption: A case study of the Toulouse scientific area5
A study of the determinants of psychologists' data sharing and open data badge adoption5
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings5
A perpetual motion machine: The preserved digital scholarly record4
scite: The next generation of citations4
Enhancing journal reputation and academic socialization: Review feedback matters beyond its gatekeeping function4
Visegrád countries' scientific productivity in the European context: A 10‐year perspective using Web of Science and Scopus4
Investigating gender differences in journal selection decisions: A survey of academic researchers4
Archiving website‐based references in academic papers: Problems caused by reference rot, potential solutions and limitations4
Tracing the footsteps of open research data in China4
Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons)4
Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform4
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research4
The resilience of scientific publication: From elite ancient academies to open access4
The impact of the pandemic on early career researchers' work‐life and scholarly communications: A quantitative aerial analysis4
Reuse‐oriented data publishing: How to make the shared research data friendlier for researchers4
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain4
From sensemaking to sensegiving: A discourse analysis of the scholarly communications community's public response to the global pandemic4
Beyond data: Sharing related research outputs to make data reusable4
The need for accelerated change in diversity, equity and inclusion in publishing and learned societies4
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention3
Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media3
Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics3
Characteristics of scholarly journals published in non‐English‐speaking countries: An analysis of Library and Information Science SCOPUS journals3
A lesson in resilience: The abrupt digital transformation of society conferences in 20203
Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China3
Why openness makes research infrastructure resilient3
The academic labour of knowledge mobilization: What scholarly publishers need to know3
Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the International Political Science Review3
Chief editors in aquatic science and communication are more likely to oversee editorial boards from their own regions3
Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero‐American scientific journals3
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science3
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship3
Outside the library: Early career researchers and use of alternative information sources in pandemic times3
The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing3
What to communicate in retraction notices?3
Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market3
Editorial bias in top‐tier education journals: Factors influencing publishable scholarship in China3
Evaluating the correlation between different impact indicators for library and information science journals: Comparing the journal citation reports and scopus3
Tensions and challenges in the decolonisation of academic publishing: A cross‐tabulation analysis of articles in Island Studies Journal2
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter2
Now you have to pay! A deeper look at publishing practices of predatory journals2
Making journals more international: Language subject differences and impact performance2
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?2
Exploring the relationship between traditional bibliometrics and Altmetric scores in the primary care literature2
Preprints as an alternative to conference proceedings: A hands‐on experience at EDICIC Iberian Meeting 20192
So, what does resilience mean for scholarly publishing?2
Research grants, research collaboration, and publication in predatory journals: Evidence from publications by Indonesian social scientists2
Is AI giving us more than we can or even should handle?2
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications2
Long‐term outcomes of 2‐day training on planning and writing research on publication output of medical professionals: 11‐year cohort study2
Opportunities for eTextbook innovations and partnerships: A case study of the Marriott Library at the University of Utah2
Opening research data contributes to the citations of related research articles: Evidence from Data in Brief2
Blockchain for scholarly journal evaluation: Potential and prospects2
Missing a golden opportunity? An analysis of publication trends by income level in the Directory of Open Access Journals 1987–20202
Performance of China's journals indexed in SCIE: An evaluation based on megajournal metrics2
Is ORCID your ID? A case study at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Porto2
Breaking free from academic scams: Five key reflections on the cloned journal conundrum2
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar2
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors2
Introducing a data availability policy for journals at IOP Publishing: Measuring the impact on authors and editorial teams2
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles2
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review2
Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy?2
Can promotion on WeChat official accounts improve scholarly journals' academic impact? A micro‐level correlation comparison study2
Early‐career researchers shaping publishing strategy2
Development of a diagnostic framework and its application to open access journal publishing in Korea2
The promise and the future of research data sharing2
Patient authorship of medical research publications: An evolution, revolution, and solution?1
The robot uprising is here: Is scholarly publishing ready?1
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs1
Establishing an early indicator for data sharing and reuse1
Characteristics of Imperial College London's COVID‐19 research outputs1
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing1
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing1
The barriers and informational needs of students and junior researchers when reading scientific papers1
How do editors use editorials to lead their journals? Insights from the field of human resource management1
The phantom of the author: predatory publisher OMICS is ghost‐writing its own articles1
WhatsApp — what’s that?1
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks1
Transforming scholarly communications: The part played by the pandemic and the contribution of early career researchers1
A seat for all: Advancing racial equity in scholarly publishing of health policy and health services research1
Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review1
The production, circulation, consumption, and ownership of scientific knowledge: Historical perspectives: Review1
There is no such thing as a predatory journal1
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives1
Company culture and employee retention: Session takeaways1
Impact of a new institutional medical journal on professional identity development and academic cultural change: A qualitative study1
Publishing during a pandemic: Resilience and change1
Investigating academic conference publications from provincial administrative regions in the mainland of China1
Beyond Beall's list: The need for contemporary evaluation tools in predatory publishing research1
To my reviewers, with respect and gratitude: Guidelines from an author1
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers1
Editorial H‐score as a metric of inner authenticity for national scientific journals—Pilot study for the field of pedagogy1
University press selection of e‐book vendors forUSacademic libraries: Why work with X but not Y?1
Author identity taxonomy: Capturing diversity for the books supply chain1
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany1
STM's Research Data Year: Results, lessons learnt, and next steps1
Linguistic changes in the transition from summaries to abstracts: The case of the Journal of Experimental Medicine1
The publication facts label: A public and professional guide for research articles1
The untapped potential of early career researchers in academic publishing: Lessons learned from the Journal of Emerging Investigators model1
Declaration of conflict of interest in medical researchers: A cross‐sectional study from China1
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication1
0.043929815292358