Learned Publishing

Papers
(The median citation count of Learned Publishing is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences48
Global academic response to COVID‐19: Cross‐sectional study29
Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access?28
Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers27
Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID‐19 research papers24
Consumer community cognition, brand loyalty, and behaviour intentions within online publishing communities: An empirical study of Epubit in China22
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness21
Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus21
Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis17
National comparisons of early career researchers' scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours16
Sharing research with academia and beyond: Insights from early career researchers in Australia and Japan15
Promoting science with linguistic devices: A large‐scale study of positive and negative words in academic writing14
The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges14
The prevalence and impact of special issues in communications journals 2015–201914
Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID‐19 crisis13
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions13
Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences13
Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals: Results of an online questionnaire survey12
Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects12
Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles12
Standardizing terminology for text recycling in research writing12
An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 202012
Fear of the academic fake? Journal editorials and the amplification of the 'predatory publishing' discourse11
Journal hijacking: Challenges and potential solutions11
The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals11
Thousands of Australian academics on the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers11
Improving peer‐review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy11
Publishing during pandemic: Innovation, collaboration, and change10
Knowledge production on predatory publishing: A systematic review10
Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation10
Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view10
Token‐curated registry in a scholarly journal: Can blockchain support journal communities?10
Human‐ and AI‐based authorship: Principles and ethics10
Journal self‐citation trends in 1975–2017 and the effect on journal impact and article citations9
Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction9
Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects9
Perspectives on institutional valuing and support for academic and translational outputs in Japan and Australia9
Scholarly journal publishing standards, policies and guidelines8
Factors influencing the choice of a publication venue in library and information science8
Why we should have listened to Jeffrey Beall from the start8
Adopting open access in an emerging country: Is gender inequality a barrier in humanities and social sciences?8
The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer: Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions8
Titles in research articles: Changes across time and discipline7
Publication practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?7
Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill7
Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits7
University presses and the impact of COVID‐197
Home country bias in academic publishing: A case study of the New England Journal of Medicine7
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers7
Journal editors and journal indexes: Internationalization pressures in the semi‐periphery of the world of science7
Factors impacting international‐indexed publishing among Vietnamese educational researchers7
Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers7
Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact7
Plain language summaries: Enabling increased diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in scholarly publishing6
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers6
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals6
COVID‐19 Rapid Review cross‐publisher initiative: What we have learned and what we are going to do next6
Why do journals discontinue? A study of Australian ceased journals6
Politics matters: The power dynamics behind Chinese English‐language humanities and social science journals6
Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo‐Ukrainian war6
Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields6
Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy—A case study in the earth and environmental sciences6
The impact of COVID‐19 on the UK publishing industry: Findings and opportunity6
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles6
Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma6
Expanding Nature: Product line and brand extensions of a scientific journal5
An analysis of journalism articles achieving high Altmetric attention scores5
The AMSTAR‐2 critical appraisal tool and editorial decision‐making for systematic reviews: Retrospective, bibliometric study5
How often are basic details of the research process mentioned in social science research papers?5
The future of scientific journals: The rise of UniAI5
Authors' choice between parent and mirror journals of Elsevier5
Evaluating equity in scholarly publishing5
Analysing the research performance of province‐level administrative regions in China4
Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers4
Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results4
Do graphical abstracts on a publisher's official website have an effect on articles' usage and citations? A propensity score matching analysis4
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought4
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers4
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies4
Objectivity of the peer‐review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies4
Scholarly journal publishing in Australia4
Beyond data: Sharing related research outputs to make data reusable4
Should authors cite sources suggested by peer reviewers? Six antidotes for handling potentially coercive reviewer citation suggestions3
Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics3
The adoption of international publishing within Vietnamese academia from 1986 to 2020: A review3
Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform3
Preliminary evidence that letters to the editor are indexed inconsistently in PubMed and in exercise science and physical therapy journals: Implications and resolutions3
Enter the dragon: China and global academic publishing3
Why openness makes research infrastructure resilient3
The resilience of scientific publication: From elite ancient academies to open access3
Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media3
A perpetual motion machine: The preserved digital scholarly record3
Attitudes of researchers towards plagiarism: A study on a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia3
Reuse‐oriented data publishing: How to make the shared research data friendlier for researchers3
ORCID growth and field‐wise dynamics of adoption: A case study of the Toulouse scientific area3
Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors3
From sensemaking to sensegiving: A discourse analysis of the scholarly communications community's public response to the global pandemic3
Investigating gender differences in journal selection decisions: A survey of academic researchers3
David among Goliaths: Open access publishing in scientific (semi‐)periphery3
The impact of the pandemic on early career researchers' work‐life and scholarly communications: A quantitative aerial analysis3
Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons)3
Tracing the footsteps of open research data in China3
The Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies: An initiative to foster editorial transparency in scholarly publishing3
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review3
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention3
Visegrád countries' scientific productivity in the European context: A 10‐year perspective using Web of Science and Scopus3
The need for accelerated change in diversity, equity and inclusion in publishing and learned societies3
The academic labour of knowledge mobilization: What scholarly publishers need to know2
The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing2
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings2
Can promotion on WeChat official accounts improve scholarly journals' academic impact? A micro‐level correlation comparison study2
Reforming science publishing2
Chief editors in aquatic science and communication are more likely to oversee editorial boards from their own regions2
So, what does resilience mean for scholarly publishing?2
scite: The next generation of citations2
Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China2
What significance does Publishing Studies have right now?2
The transition of ARVO journals to open access2
Introducing a data availability policy for journals at IOP Publishing: Measuring the impact on authors and editorial teams2
Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy?2
Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the International Political Science Review2
What to communicate in retraction notices?2
Performance of China's journals indexed in SCIE: An evaluation based on megajournal metrics2
Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates2
Characteristics of scholarly journals published in non‐English‐speaking countries: An analysis of Library and Information Science SCOPUS journals2
A lesson in resilience: The abrupt digital transformation of society conferences in 20202
A study of the determinants of psychologists' data sharing and open data badge adoption2
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors2
Opportunities for eTextbook innovations and partnerships: A case study of the Marriott Library at the University of Utah2
Archiving website‐based references in academic papers: Problems caused by reference rot, potential solutions and limitations2
Blockchain for scholarly journal evaluation: Potential and prospects2
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review2
Preprints as an alternative to conference proceedings: A hands‐on experience at EDICIC Iberian Meeting 20192
Early‐career researchers shaping publishing strategy2
Four reports on the OA monograph: Review2
Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero‐American scientific journals2
Collaborating for public access to scholarly publications: A case study of the partnership between the US Department of Energy and CHORUS2
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research2
The two faces of the corresponding author and the need to separate them2
Long‐term outcomes of 2‐day training on planning and writing research on publication output of medical professionals: 11‐year cohort study2
Linguistic changes in the transition from summaries to abstracts: The case of the Journal of Experimental Medicine1
Publishing during a pandemic: Resilience and change1
Declaration of conflict of interest in medical researchers: A cross‐sectional study from China1
To my reviewers, with respect and gratitude: Guidelines from an author1
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks1
Evaluating the correlation between different impact indicators for library and information science journals: Comparing the journal citation reports and scopus1
Editorial H‐score as a metric of inner authenticity for national scientific journals—Pilot study for the field of pedagogy1
Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals1
Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review1
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship1
Characteristics of Imperial College London's COVID‐19 research outputs1
Journal Information1
Outside the library: Early career researchers and use of alternative information sources in pandemic times1
The untapped potential of early career researchers in academic publishing: Lessons learned from the Journal of Emerging Investigators model1
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review1
Is ORCID your ID? A case study at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Porto1
Research grants, research collaboration, and publication in predatory journals: Evidence from publications by Indonesian social scientists1
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication1
Editorial bias in top‐tier education journals: Factors influencing publishable scholarship in China1
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills1
A seat for all: Advancing racial equity in scholarly publishing of health policy and health services research1
Establishing an early indicator for data sharing and reuse1
The production, circulation, consumption, and ownership of scientific knowledge: Historical perspectives: Review1
Author identity taxonomy: Capturing diversity for the books supply chain1
Missing a golden opportunity? An analysis of publication trends by income level in the Directory of Open Access Journals 1987–20201
1
Opening research data contributes to the citations of related research articles: Evidence from Data in Brief1
1
Making journals more international: Language subject differences and impact performance1
Investigating academic conference publications from provincial administrative regions in the mainland of China1
Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market1
The promise and the future of research data sharing1
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain1
Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review1
The publication of health sciences theses in Turkey: A study of Ege University1
Now you have to pay! A deeper look at publishing practices of predatory journals1
University press selection of e‐book vendors for US academic libraries: Why work with X but not Y?1
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles1
The barriers and informational needs of students and junior researchers when reading scientific papers1
Crypto access: Is it possible to use cryptocurrencies in scholarly periodicals?1
0.04095196723938