Food Quality and Preference

Papers
(The H4-Index of Food Quality and Preference is 41. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives321
The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on food priorities. Results from a preliminary study using social media and an online survey with Spanish consumers213
Facilitators and inhibitors of organic food buying behavior142
Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand consumer purchase behavior for organic vegetables in Brazil: The role of perceived health benefits, perceived sustainability benefits and perceiv101
Reducing meat consumption in meat-loving Denmark: Exploring willingness, behavior, barriers and drivers82
Drivers of food waste reduction behaviour in the household context79
A multi-national comparison of meat eaters' attitudes and expectations for burgers containing beef, pea or algae protein79
Clean label: Why this ingredient but not that one?74
Plant-based alternatives vs dairy milk: Consumer segments and their sensory, emotional, cognitive and situational use responses to tasted products67
Consumer understanding of sustainability concept in agricultural products65
Intention to purchase wellbeing food among Korean consumers: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior65
A systematic review of studies using the Food Neophobia Scale: Conclusions from thirty years of studies65
Sustainable food choice motives: The development and cross-country validation of the Sustainable Food Choice Questionnaire (SUS-FCQ)64
Effect of information on consumers’ sensory evaluation of beef, plant-based and hybrid beef burgers62
Willingness to adopt a more plant-based diet in China and New Zealand: Applying the theories of planned behaviour, meat attachment and food choice motives61
Contextual acceptance of novel and unfamiliar foods: Insects, cultured meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and 3D printed foods60
Distinguishing meat reducers from unrestricted omnivores, vegetarians and vegans: A comprehensive comparison of Australian consumers59
What factors affect consumers’ dining sentiments and their ratings: Evidence from restaurant online review data59
Food & meal decision making in lockdown: How and who has Covid-19 affected?59
Finally, the chance to eat healthily: Longitudinal study about food consumption during and after the first COVID-19 lockdown in Italy58
Consumers’ evaluation of the environmental friendliness, healthiness and naturalness of meat, meat substitutes, and other protein-rich foods57
Impact of COVID-19 confinement on eating behaviours across 16 European countries: The COVIDiet cross-national study56
Consumers’ willingness to pay for upcycled foods54
Core dimensions of food-related lifestyle: A new instrument for measuring food involvement, innovativeness and responsibility53
Sensory acceptability of new plant protein meat substitutes52
Situational appropriateness of meat products, meat substitutes and meat alternatives as perceived by Dutch consumers50
Making ugly food beautiful: Consumer barriers to purchase and marketing options for Suboptimal Food at retail level – A systematic review50
Targeting interventions to distinct meat-eating groups reduces meat consumption47
Healthier eating: Covid-19 disruption as a catalyst for positive change46
Dynamic texture perception in plant-based yogurt alternatives: Identifying temporal drivers of liking by TDS46
Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions: Sensory term citation frequency reflects rated term intensity and applicability45
An exploratory consumer study of 3D printed food perception in a real-life military setting44
True colours: Advantages and challenges of virtual reality in a sensory science experiment on the influence of colour on flavour identification43
Flexitarianism in the Netherlands in the 2010 decade: Shifts, consumer segments and motives43
How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture43
An integrated framework to explain consumers’ purchase intentions toward green food in the Chinese context43
A combined Nutri-Score and ‘Eco-Score’ approach for more nutritious and more environmentally friendly food choices? Evidence from a consumer experiment in Belgium42
Do consumers value food products containing upcycled ingredients? The effect of nutritional and environmental information42
Americans’ acceptance of black soldier fly larvae as food for themselves, their dogs, and farmed animals42
Information, attitudes, and consumer evaluations of cultivated meat41
Insects as food and feed in Portugal and Norway – Cross-cultural comparison of determinants of acceptance41
0.073060035705566