Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Papers
(The median citation count of Method & Theory in the Study of Religion is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Global Religious History9
Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Islam: Rethinking Islamic Theology, Law, Education, and Mysticism Using the Works of al-Ghazālī8
The New Animism and Its Challenges to the Study of Religion7
Comparative Secularities: Tracing Social and Epistemic Structures beyond the Modern West6
The Yoga Studies Dispositif5
Branding Salafism: Salafi Missionaries as Social Media Influencers5
Entheogenic Experience and Spirituality4
I Want to Become an Orientalist Not a Colonizer or a “De-Colonizer”3
Rajnarayan Basu and His “Science of Religion”: The Emergence of Religious Studies through Exchanges between Bengali and Christian Reformers, Orientalists, and Theosophists3
African Witchcraft and Religion among the Yoruba: Translation as Demarcation Practice within a Global Religious History3
He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune: Big Data, Philanthrocapitalism, and the Demise of the Historical Study of Religions3
“So Many Mothers, So Little Love”: Discourse of Motherly Love and Parental Governance in 2019 Hong Kong Protests2
Global Religious History in Theory and Practice2
“Pay No Attention to That Man Behind the Curtain”: A Critique of the Rational Choice Approach to Religion2
Studying the Qurʾan in the Context of Indonesian Islamic Higher Education2
The Religious Predisposition2
Islam Is Not a “Religion” – Global Religious History and Early Twentieth-Century Debates in British Malaya2
Reversing the Gaze? Or Decolonizing the Study of the Qurʾan2
Religion, Politics, History, and Culture1
‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations1
The Discursive Side of Sociological Institutionalism in the Study of Religion1
Paying the Piper: History, Humanities, and the Scientific Study of Religion1
What’s in a (Change of) Name? Much—but Not That Much—and Not What Wiebe Claims1
A Critical Examination of Pascal Boyer’s Religion Explained The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought1
A Report on the Special Executive Committee Meeting of the International Association for the History of Religions in Delphi1
A Response to Stephen L. Young, “Let’s Take the Text Seriously”: the Protectionist Doxa in Mainstream New Testament Studies1
The Primary History as Museum Exhibit: Rethinking the Recovery of the Hebrew Bible’s Artifacts1
A Contextual Genealogical Approach to Study the Religious1
The Approach of the Fiqh Council of North America towards Identity Problems of Contemporary Muslim Minorities1
Pondering the Legacy of Geo Widengren: Isolated Genius, or Uncritical Supporter of a Band of Brothers?0
Speculative Realism and Religion: Irreduction, Objects, Forms, and Intensities0
On Redescribing Christian Origins0
Studying Islam in Western and Non-Western Contexts0
Learning from the Past0
Hearing Hindu Stories0
“What the One Thing Shows Me in the Case of Two Things”: Comparison as Essential to a Proper Academic Study of Religion0
Redescribing, But Really, Finally Moving on From Israelite Origins0
Missionary Methodology and the Making of Aztec Human Sacrifice: Decolonizing a Concept0
Religious Rituals as Civil hexis0
How Do You Solve a Problem Like ‘Religious Literacy’?: Thinking with Wolfart’s ‘Religious Literacy’ Reservations0
Taking Stock of the Academic Work of Geo Widengren: Some Observations on a Forgotten Classic and an “All-Round Historian of Religion”0
Awkward History, Awkward Theory0
Discourses on Research Freedom in the Academic Study of Religion. An Overview0
Revolutionizing the Human Sciences: A Response to Wiebe0
Editor’s Note0
‘Belief’ and Anthropology, in Use and in Theory0
“Then He Stabbed Me with a Spear”: Aggressive Sacred Images and Interreligious Polemics0
Constructing Spirituality in the Cognitive Science of Religion0
Breaking the Spell: Reconsidering Cognitive and Evolutionary Approaches to Atheism0
The Comparative Method in the Study of Religion and Race: a Reflection on Lincoln and Freiberger0
By Way of Response0
Power and the Reproduction of History: Twentieth-Century Histories of Abortion in the Ancient Mediterranean World0
A Modest Reply to Timothy Fitzgerald0
Debating Critical Religion: A Response to Timothy Fitzgerald0
Survivals: The Stakes of Religious Literacy0
“What is critical religion?” A Response to Galen Watts and Sharday Mosurinjohn, “Can Critical Religion Play by Its Own Rules?”0
“The Main Parts Are Made in Europe”: Apologetic/Critical Dichotomy and the Untold Story of Qur’anic Studies in the Iranian Academy0
Distinguishing Our Object of Study: “Religious” but not “Religion”0
An Indigenous Jesus: Methodological and Theoretical Intersections in the Comparative Study of Religion0
The Eclipse of Morality: A Riposte to Lane, Wildman, & Shults’ “Paying the Piper” Commentary0
The Realism of Discourse: Critical Reflections on the Work of Kevin Schilbrack0
Comparison Considered: Some Methodological Responses0
The Case for Studying Non-Muslim Islams0
Metamodernism: A Multispecies Approach to Hermeneutics0
Burton Mack’s Challenge to the Study of Religion0
Chastening and Disciplining Comparison: Bruce Lincoln and Oliver Freiberger on the Comparative Method in the Study of Religion0
A Normative Turn in the Study of Religions?0
The Postsecular – Jürgen Habermas, the Intellectual Dark Web, and Alexandr Dugin as (In)Voluntary Participants in a Global Dispositif0
The “Constitutive Relevance of Models” (CRoM) Test0
Metamodernism: A Response About Magic0
Front matter0
Worldview Literacy as Educational Praxis0
Back matter0
On the Orientalism of Dana Logan’s Awkward Rituals0
Response to Symposium on Awkward Rituals0
Transcendence: A Defensible and Fruitful Concept for Religious Studies0
Religious Studies and the Spiritual Turn0
Memoirs of an Academic Rōnin: Religious Studies and Mentorship in the Age of Post-Truth0
Voluntary Costly Signals in Religious Communities: A Political Interpretation0
Recent Research in Syriac Studies and the Recurring Question of Identity0
Comparison and the Academic Study of Indigenous Religious Traditions0
Negotiating Identity and Power during a Crisis: An Analysis of ‘Small Stories’ Told by Australian Christian Priests during the COVID-19 Health Crisis0
A Response to My Critics0
You Can Lead a Horse to Water, But You Can’t Make It Drink0
Alternative Lenses for Qualitative Religion Research: Interstitial, Inverted, and Dialogical Approaches0
Religious Studies for Cyborgs: Cognitive Science and Social Theory after Humanism0
The Typological Phenomenology of Religion – Resurrected: Managing a Legacy from Geo Widengren0
Inevitably Comparative, but Not Inevitably Positive: the Study of Jews and Judaism within the Field of Religious Studies0
American Christian Nationalism and the Meaning of “Religion”0
“The Field, at the Moment, Is Up for Redefinition”: Twenty Five Years of Manufacturing Religion0
Curators of Global Buddhism: A Critical Genealogy and Decolonial Reading of Contemporary Curatorial Practices in Buddhist Studies0
Religionizing Christianity: Towards a Poststructuralist Notion of Global Religious History0
“Reconstructing the Study of Religion”: Entering the Conversation from a Different Corner of the Academic World0
Method and Methodology in the Study of Religion: Making Sense of the Diversity0
Tradition as Body0
Redescribing Our Primary Expertise Or, In Praise of Promiscuous Curiosities0
The Awkwardness of American Exceptionalism0
Editor’s Note0
How Do We Tell the Story of Medieval Copts? Inspirations from Burton Mack0
A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion0
Back matter0
Concepts of ‘Law’ as Both Tools and Objects in the Study of Religions: A Case from 1950s Ghana – or When may a Christian Slaughter a Sheep?0
Scholarly Values, Methods, and Evidence in the Academic Study of Religion0
Comparing ‘Religion’ and ‘Nonreligion’: towards a Critique of Modernity0
Attached Critique: Paranoid and Reparative Studies of Religion0
Theorizing Awkwardness, with Style, in the Study of Religion: A Forum on Dana W. Logan’s Awkward Rituals (2022)0
A Response to Wolfart’s “Religious Literacy”: Some Considerations and Reservations0
“‘Cause Even Though Perfect It’s Not/ It’s the Best Thing This World’s Got” – or Not?0
Religious Literacy as Religion Literacy: A Response from the UK0
Cringing at Benevolence0
Critical Humanism and the Study of Religion: A Statement and Defense0
Identity Turn: Managing Decolonialization and Identity Politics in the Study of Religion0
Editor’s Note0
Front matter0
Studying the Qurʾan: Neither Here nor There0
Colonial Modernity and Diffusion of Power: Identity and Community Formation among Mappilas of Malabar0
The Scientific Study of Religion: A Very Brief Reply to Donald Wiebe0
Global Religious History as a Rhizome: Colonial Panics and Political Islam in German East Africa0
Protecting Difference: Protectionist Strategies and the Parting of the Ways0
The Role of Canon in the Study of Hinduism and Some Notes About Bourdieu: A Response to Stephen L. Young0
Performative Animism0
Is There a Difference Between “Religion” and “Politics”?0
Reflections on Wolfart, Challenges to Religious Literacy, and Course Design0
Emotion and Islamic Hagiology: A Post-taxonomic Approach0
We Have Never Been Modern (Enough)0
Front matter0
The Role of Religious Experiences and Religious Institutions: Comparing Peter L. Berger’s and Hans Joas’ Approach to Religion0
0.050354957580566