Journal for General Philosophy of Science

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal for General Philosophy of Science is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges21
Six Theses on Mechanisms and Mechanistic Science16
Identical Quantum Particles as Distinguishable Objects14
Can Reasons and Values Influence Action: How Might Intentional Agency Work Physiologically?12
Presentist History for Pluralist Science12
What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?11
Hierarchies, Networks, and Causality: The Applied Evolutionary Epistemological Approach10
The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation9
Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis9
The Case Against Factorism: On the Labels of $$\otimes$$-Factor Hilbert-Spaces of Similar Particles in Quantum Mechanics8
Formal Models of Scientific Inquiry in a Social Context: An Introduction7
Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy7
Norms of Testimony in Broad Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Quantum Mechanics in Critical Theory7
Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem7
Typicality and Minutis Rectis Laws: From Physics to Sociology6
Otto Neurath’s Scientific Utopianism Revisited-A Refined Model for Utopias in Thought Experiments5
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem5
Machine Learning and the Future of Scientific Explanation5
Conceptual Structuralism5
Homeostatic Property Cluster Theory without Homeostatic Mechanisms: Two Recent Attempts and their Costs5
Evolutionary Epistemology: Two Research Avenues, Three Schools, and A Single and Shared Agenda5
Which Methods Are Useful to Justify Public Policies? An Analysis of Cost–Benefit Analysis, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and Non-Aggregate Indicator Systems4
Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together3
Empiricism Must, but Cannot, Presuppose Real Causation3
The Implications of the No-Free-Lunch Theorems for Meta-induction3
Addressing the Reproducibility Crisis: A Response to Hudson3
Cournot and Renouvier on Scientific Revolutions3
Appearance and Persistence as the Unity of Diachronic and Synchronic Concepts of Emergence3
Improve Popper and Procure a Perfect Simulacrum of Verification Indistinguishable from the Real Thing3
Proof, Explanation, and Justification in Mathematical Practice3
How to Justify the Symmetrization Postulate in Quantum Mechanics3
Direct Inference and Probabilistic Accounts of Induction3
Fallibilism versus Relativism in the Philosophy of Science3
Whewell’s Hylomorphism as a Metaphorical Explanation for How Mind and World Merge3
Dedekind and Wolffian Deductive Method3
Cooperative Division of Cognitive Labour: The Social Epistemology of Photosynthesis Research3
About the Reaction to Styles of Thought on the Continental Drift Debate2
On Chemical Natural Kinds2
Why Computer Simulation Cannot Be an End of Thought Experimentation2
Pluralizing Darwin: Making Counter-Factual History of Science Significant2
Methodological Signatures in Early Ethology: The Problem of Animal Subjectivity2
Phylogenetic Distribution and Trajectories of Visual Consciousness: Examining Feinberg and Mallatt’s Neurobiological Naturalism2
Leibniz, Kant, and Referring in the Quantum Domain2
Thematic Reclassifications and Emerging Sciences2
Undecidability of the Spectral Gap: An Epistemological Look2
Scientific Modeling Versus Engineering Modeling: Similarities and Dissimilarities2
Mario Bunge (1919–2020): Conjoining Philosophy of Science and Scientific Philosophy2
From Unobservable to Observable: Scientific Realism and the Discovery of Radium2
The Concept of the Universe in Physical Cosmology2
Critique of Wave-Particle Duality of Single-Photons2
On the Assessed Strength of Agents’ Bias2
0.021523952484131