OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)

Article	Citations
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	14
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	10
Representing the Structure of a Debate	10
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	9
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	9
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	9
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	8
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	8
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	6
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	5
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition	5
Teaching the Fallacies	5
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	5
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate	3
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	3
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	3
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness	2
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	2
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction	2
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	2
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	2
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	2

Negotiation as Practical Argumentation