OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)

Article	Citations
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Argument Structures Among English Learners: Argument Proficiency, Patterns, and Communication Styles	15
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	15
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	14
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	14
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	14
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	13
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	10
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	8
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	7
Representing the Structure of a Debate	7
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	6
Teaching the Fallacies	5
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	5
Studying Controversies: A Path for Expansion of Argumentation Theory	5
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	4
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition	4
Apples Ergo Oranges: The Argumentative Use of Comparisons	3
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	3
Questions as Elements of Argumentation in Political Debates	3
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness	3
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	3
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	3
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	3
Selective Dispute Avoidance, Deep Disagreements, and Pragmatic Meta-Arguments for Engagement	3

Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	3
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	3
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	2
Presuppositional Fallacies	2
High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument	2
Locke and “ad”	2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	2
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	2
The Effects of Parliamentary Debate as a Pedagogy for Argumentation in L1 and L2 Contexts	2
Correction: Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	2
Teachers’ Perceptions of Argumentation in Citizenship Education: Psychometric Validation of the AASES Instrument and Mediation Analysis of Sociodemographic Variables Using SEM	2
Info-arguments: Dialogical Ambiguity, Argument Interpretation, and the Problem of Meaning in Argumentation	2
Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton Van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal, and Peng Wu. Argumentative Style. A pragma-Dialectical Study of Functional Variety in Argumentative Discou	2
Do Arguments for Global Warming Commit a Fallacy of Composition?	2