OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)

Article	Citations
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion	10
Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach	10
Bothsiderism	7
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View	7
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions	6
The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited	5
Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World	5
Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior	5
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem	5
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	5
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	4
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation	4
Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes	3
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies	3
Socratic Irony and Argumentation	3
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	2
Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse	2
Teaching the Fallacies	2
Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures	2
Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings	2
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes	1
Arguments and Reason-Giving	1
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies	1
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	1
A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy	1

High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument	1
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	1
Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion	1
The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion	1
On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument	1
The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention	1
Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative	1
It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going	1
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition	1
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	1
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	1
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)	1
Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies	1
Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors	1