OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)

Article	Citations
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	18
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Argument Structures Among English Learners: Argument Proficiency, Patterns, and Communication Styles	17
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	16
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	15
(Mis)representing the Opposition and Rhetorical Success: Experimental Evidence on Faithful and Inaccurate Reformulations	15
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	8
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	7
The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered	6
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	5
Representing the Structure of a Debate	5
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	5
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	4
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	4
Metaphors and Linguistic Intimacy in Ad Populum Arguments	4
Teaching the Fallacies	4
Studying Controversies: A Path for Expansion of Argumentation Theory	3
“argument as war”: A Synergy of Metadiscourse and Pragma-dialectics in Exploring Qur’anic Argumentation	3
Apples Ergo Oranges: The Argumentative Use of Comparisons	3
A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation	3
Selective Dispute Avoidance, Deep Disagreements, and Pragmatic Meta-Arguments for Engagement	3
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness	3
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	3
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	3
Two Logical Senses of ‘Argument’	3

Info-arguments: Dialogical Ambiguity, Argument Interpretation, and the Problem of Meaning in Argumentation	2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	2
Questions as Elements of Argumentation in Political Debates	2
Is a Contradiction Between Arguments Less Likely to be Noticed When They are Implicit? An Experimental Case Study	2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	2
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	2
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	2
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	2
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	2
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	2
Teachers’ Perceptions of Argumentation in Citizenship Education: Psychometric Validation of the AASES Instrument and Mediation Analysis of Sociodemographic Variables Using SEM	2