OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-02-01 to 2025-02-01.)

Article	Citations
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	10
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)	10
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	7
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation	7
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	6
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	5
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies	5
Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse	5
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem	5
The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention	5
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion	4
Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation	4
The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion	3
Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation	3
On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument	3
Epidemiology of Fallacies	2
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	2
Wittgenstein and Toulmin’s Model of Argument: The Riddle Explained Away	2
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	2
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach	1
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition	1
Arguments and Reason-Giving	1
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	1
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	1
The Recursive Argument Structure	1

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse	1
The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption	1
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	1
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	1
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes	1
Representing the Structure of a Debate	1
The Persistent Interlocutor	1
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	1
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	1
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	1
Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World	1
Against the Neutral View of Poisoning the Well	1