OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Argumentation is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)

Article	Citations
Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach	10
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion	10
Bothsiderism	7
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View	7
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions	6
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	5
The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited	5
Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World	5
Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior	5
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem	5
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation	4
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	4
Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes	3
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies	3
Socratic Irony and Argumentation	3
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	2
Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse	2
Teaching the Fallacies	2
Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures	2
Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings	2
Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies	1
Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors	1
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes	1
Arguments and Reason-Giving	1
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies	1

Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	1
A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy	1
High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument	1
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	1
Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion	1
The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion	1
On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument	1
The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention	1
Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative	1
It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going	1
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition	1
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	1
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	1
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)	1
Defeasibility, Law, and Argumentation: A Critical View from an Interpretative Standpoint	0
Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation	0
Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. An Anthology of Argumentation and the Law. ed. by H. V. Hansen, F. J. Kauffeld, J. B. Freeman, and L. Bermejo-Luque. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2019	0
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	0
Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)	0
Christopher W. Tindale: The Anthropology of Argument: Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason	0
Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp	0
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	0
Representing the Structure of a Debate	0
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021	0
Do Arguments for Global Warming Commit a Fallacy of Composition?	0
The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them	0
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach	0
Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation	0
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition	0
Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton Van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal, and Peng Wu. Argumentative Style. A pragma-Dialectical Study of Functional Variety in Argumentative Discou	0
Wittgenstein and Toulmin’s Model of Argument: The Riddle Explained Away	0
Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation	0
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	0
Charles Arthur Willard (1945–2021): In Memoriam	0
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	0
Primatologists and Philosophers Debate on the Question of the Origin of Morality: A Dialectical Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation Strategies and the Pitfalls of Cross-Disciplinary Disagreement	0
Argumentum Ex Divinatione: Divination and Civic Argument in the Ancient World	0
Why We Need Skepticism in Argument: Skeptical Engagement as a Requirement for Epistemic Justice	0
What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?	0
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	0
Epistemic Norms for Public Political Arguments	0
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	0
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction	0
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate	0
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	0
Michel Meyer (1950–2022)	0
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse	0
Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war	0
The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption	0
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	0

Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation	0
The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete	0
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	0
Locke and “ad”	0
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation	0
Presuppositional Fallacies	0
Assessing Classification Reliability of Conditionals in Discourse	0
Modal Qualification and the Speech-Act of Arguing in LNMA: Practical Aspects and a Theoretical Issue	0
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	0
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	0
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	0
The Persistent Interlocutor	0
Correction: Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	0
In Defense of a Normative Concept of Argument	0
Raymond S. Nickerson, Argumentation, The Art of Persuasion	0
Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns	0
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	0
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	0
Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions	0
Epidemiology of Fallacies	0