Argumentation

Papers
(The median citation count of Argumentation is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-02-01 to 2024-02-01.)
ArticleCitations
“Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment16
Annotating Argument Schemes14
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation10
Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach8
Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation6
The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives6
The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory5
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem5
No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation5
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion5
Bothsiderism5
From Yeshiva to Academia: The Argumentative Writing Characteristics of Ultra-Orthodox Male Students5
Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems in the Spring and Autumn Period of Ancient China4
“That’s Unhelpful, Harmful and Offensive!” Epistemic and Ethical Concerns with Meta-argument Allegations4
On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion4
Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior4
Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World4
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements3
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions3
Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse3
On the Differences Between Practical and Cognitive Presumptions3
Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik2
Argument, Inference, and Persuasion2
The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions2
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation2
Whataboutisms and Inconsistency2
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies2
Socratic Irony and Argumentation2
Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes2
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View1
Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings1
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing1
Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’1
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)1
Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative1
High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument1
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition1
Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law1
Arguments and Reason-Giving1
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics1
How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments1
The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited1
Teaching the Fallacies1
Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion1
Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident1
The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention1
Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type1
Modal Qualification and the Speech-Act of Arguing in LNMA: Practical Aspects and a Theoretical Issue0
Michel Meyer (1950–2022)0
Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns0
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory0
The Persistent Interlocutor0
Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation0
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition0
Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors0
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference0
Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures0
Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation0
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning0
Epistemic Norms for Public Political Arguments0
Presuppositional Fallacies0
Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory0
Argumentum Ad Baculum, Aristotelian Civic Fear, or Praeteritio: Threats in Anti-Choice Letters0
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy0
Review of Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context, eds. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen0
Why We Need Skepticism in Argument: Skeptical Engagement as a Requirement for Epistemic Justice0
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science0
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias0
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies0
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context0
Raymond S. Nickerson, Argumentation, The Art of Persuasion0
Representing the Structure of a Debate0
Correction to: Revisiting Accounts of Narrative Explanation in the Sciences: Some Clarifications from Contemporary Argumentation Theory0
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach0
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination0
The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption0
Jain Philosophers in the Debating Hall of Classical India0
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes0
Correction to: Eddo Rigotti and Sara Greco: Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes0
On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument0
Locke and “ad”0
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies0
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction0
Argumentum Ex Divinatione: Divination and Civic Argument in the Ancient World0
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation0
Primatologists and Philosophers Debate on the Question of the Origin of Morality: A Dialectical Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation Strategies and the Pitfalls of Cross-Disciplinary Disagreement0
The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion0
Argumentation Through Languages and Cultures0
Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp0
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate0
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies0
Correction: Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination0
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context0
Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation0
Douglas Neil Walton (1942–2020)0
Do Arguments for Global Warming Commit a Fallacy of Composition?0
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse0
The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete0
Eddo Rigotti and Sara Greco: Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes0
Defeasibility, Law, and Argumentation: A Critical View from an Interpretative Standpoint0
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk0
Charles Arthur Willard (1945–2021): In Memoriam0
Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation0
Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. An Anthology of Argumentation and the Law. ed. by H. V. Hansen, F. J. Kauffeld, J. B. Freeman, and L. Bermejo-Luque. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 20190
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate0
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 20210
Assessing Classification Reliability of Conditionals in Discourse0
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate0
Christopher W. Tindale: The Anthropology of Argument: Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason0
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation0
A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy0
What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?0
It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going0
0.079607963562012