Clinical Oral Implants Research

Papers
(The H4-Index of Clinical Oral Implants Research is 27. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-11-01 to 2024-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of peri‐implant diseases: A university‐representative cross‐sectional study123
Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis80
A systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns72
Peri‐implantitis: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 202171
Customized CAD/CAM titanium meshes for the guided bone regeneration of severe alveolar ridge defects: Preliminary results of a retrospective clinical study in humans59
Influence of width of keratinized tissue on the prevalence of peri‐implant diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis56
Diagnosis of peri‐implantitis in the absence of baseline data: A diagnostic accuracy study46
Impact of design elements of the implant supracrestal complex (ISC) on the risk of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: A critical review44
Soft tissue management at implants: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 202143
Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial40
Reconstructive surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial37
Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous whole‐tooth versus demineralized dentin grafts: A randomized controlled clinical trial37
Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: Consensus report of group 1 of the DGI/SEPA/Osteology Workshop35
What is the influence of implant surface characteristics and/or implant material on the incidence and progression of peri‐implantitis? A systematic literature review35
Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review34
Autogenous Mineralized Dentin versus Xenograft granules in Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implantation in Post‐extraction Sites: A Randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow‐up33
Vertical bone augmentation utilizing a titanium‐reinforced PTFE mesh: A multi‐variate analysis of influencing factors31
In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full‐arch digital implant impressions30
Surface decontamination protocols for surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review with meta‐analysis30
Non‐surgical mechanical therapy of peri‐implantitis with or without repeated adjunctive diode laser application. A 6‐month double‐blinded randomized clinical trial29
Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis28
Study on the immunopathological effect of titanium particles in peri‐implantitis granulation tissue: A case–control study28
Reconstructive treatment of peri‐implantitis infrabony defects of various configurations: 5‐year survival and success28
The comparative evaluation of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation in sites with residual bone height ≤6 mm: A two‐year prospective randomized study28
Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: Summary and consensus statements of group 1—The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 202128
Soft tissue contour and radiographic evaluation of ridge preservation in early implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial27
Erythritol airpolishing in the non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: A randomized controlled trial27
Clinical signs, symptoms, perceptions, and impact on quality of life in patients suffering from peri‐implant diseases: a university‐representative cross‐sectional study27
Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration or socket seal technique. A randomised, single‐blind controlled clinical trial27
0.096768140792847