Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Article	Citations
Using AI to write scholarly publications	91
Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review	60
Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem	38
Unethical medical treatment and research in US territories	37
Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria	31
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers	22
Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind?	19
Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19	19
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses	18
A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction	18
Citation bias, diversity, and ethics	17
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health	17
Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges	17
Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group	16
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates	15
Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers	15
Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review	15
Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates?	14
Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved	12
Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: Barriers and recommendations	12
Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles	12
Transparency in research: An analysis of ChatGPT usage acknowledgment by authors across disciplines and geographies	10
Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?	10
Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts	10
Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making	9

Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students	9
The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts	8
Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center	8
Replication and trustworthiness	8
Institutional policies on plagiarism management:A comparison of universities in mainland China and Hong Kong	8
Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study	8
Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas	8
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders’ dishonest behavior?	8
Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey	8
A critical analysis of respondent quotes used as titles of qualitative research papers that are published in peer-reviewed journals	7
How to embed ethics into laboratory research	7
The use of text-matching software’s similarity scores	7
A research misconduct severity matrix that could serve to harmonize adjudication of findings	7
Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion	7
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals	7
What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?	7
A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed	7
For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group	7
Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance index	6
Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure	6
The letter as a forum to embed ethics into the scientific literature	6
How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?	6
A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted	6
A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences	6
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends	6
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding plagiarism of postgraduate students in Myanmar	6
Identifying the factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: An evidence-based review of the literature	6
Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study	5
Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe	5
The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations	5
Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal	5
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values	5
A bibliometric investigation of the journals that were repeatedly suppressed from Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports	5
Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study	5
“Add-my-name” as a parody of research collaboration among Nigerian researchers	5
Authorship climate: A new tool for studying ethical issues in authorship	5
Scholarly publishing experience of postgraduate students in Nigerian Universities	5
Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals	5
Peer review experiences of academic chemists in Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States	5
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity	5
Research misconduct and questionable research practices form a continuum	5
Research integrity awareness among biology students – Experience from the University of Belgrade	5
Maintaining ethics, Integrity, and accountability: Best practices for reporting a meta-analysis	4
Jumping with a parachute – is promoting research integrity meaningful?	4
Recalibrated responses needed to a global research landscape in flux	4
Using the concept of “deserved trust” to strengthen the value and integrity of biomedical research	4
The trinity of good research: Distinguishing between research integrity, ethics, and governance	4
The landscape of the characteristics, citations, scientific, technological, and altmetrics impacts of retracted papers in hematology	4
“Choice-supportive bias” in science: Explanation and mitigation	4
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study	4

Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field	4
The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia	4
Authorship commerce: Bylines for sale	4
How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code	4
Conflict of interest as a cognitive bias	4
Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach	4
Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil	4
How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers	4
The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding	4
Why do master’s students of humanities and social sciences publish papers in Chinese-language predatory journals? A qualitative study based on Grounded Theory	4
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?	4
Safeguarding scientific integrity: A case study in examining manipulation in the peer review process	3
Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods	3
Research data mismanagement – from questionable research practice to research misconduct	3
ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship	3
A Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education: A proposal to complement the Predictive Modeling Tool	3
The author expression ​of concern (AEOC): A proposed formal mechanism to allow authors’ legitimate concerns to be heard, and their rights and voices to be respected	3
Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education	3
Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?	3
Research integrity and the regulatory-industrial complex	3
Defining “recklessness” in research misconduct proceedings	3
Transform DOI system into a science hub	3
Institutional approaches to preventing questionable research practices	3
Assessing the acceptability of individual studies that use deception: A systematic review of normative guidance documents	3
Better guidance is needed for editorial expressions of concern	3
How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?	3
Teaching research integrity as discussed in research integrity codes: A systematic literature review	2
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder	2
Weighted semantic plagiarism detection approach based on AHP decision model	2
Postgraduate students’ perception of plagiarism, awareness, and use of Turnitin text-matching software	2
“Researchers’ perceptions and awareness of predatory publishing: A survey”	2
An active aigiarism declaration for manuscript submission	2
Are the lists of questionable journals reasonable: A case study of early warning journal lists	2
Toward the development of a perceived IRB violation scale	2
Article retraction rates in selected MeSH term categories in PubMed published between 2010 and 2020	2
Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil	2
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university	2
Why do some academics so often publish (letters) outside their field?	2
Responding to research misconduct allegations brought against top university officials	2
Rising quantitative productivity and shifting readership in academic publishing: Bibliometric insights from monkeypox literature	2
The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct	2
A systematic scoping review of the ethics of Contributor Role Ontologies and Taxonomies	2
NIGERIA’S LOW CONTRIBUTION TO RECOGNIZED WORLD RESEARCH LITERATURE: CAUSES AND REMEDIES	2
Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study	1
Chore or desire? Students’ response to online lessons in scientific integrity	1
Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers	1
Assessment of an electronic system for research ethics committees document management: An observational study	1
Harness editors’ networks of communication to fight publication fraud	1
Reimagining IRB review to incorporate a clear and convincing standard of evidence	1
In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline, a rejoinder to Curzer	1
Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics	1
The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study	1
Training undergraduate students in HIPAA compliance	1
Frequency of receiving requested data for a systematic review and associated factors: A cross-sectional study	1
Are highly ranked dental journals at risk of editorial bias? An examination of information on the reporting of peer-review practices	1
Timing and monitoring of financial disclosures in publications: A cross-institutional assessment of financial conflict of interest reports	1
A dramatized method for teaching undergraduate students responsible research conduct	1
The “Monsanto papers” and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature	1
A comprehensive ethics and data governance framework for data-intensive health research: Lessons from an Italian cancer research institute	1
The consistency of peer-reviewers and the process of commensuration: a comment on Bolek et al. (2022)	1
Can research integrity prevail in the market? Lessons from commissioned research organizations	1
Ten Years later: Assessments of the integrity of publications from one research group with multiple retractions	1
How often are replication attempts questioned?	1
A structural equation model for cyber academic dishonesty in higher education: Evidence from Taiwan	1
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality	1
More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists’ perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase	1
How to write a good embedded ethics letter	1
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study	1
Assuring data quality in investigator-initiated trials in dutch hospitals: Balancing between mentoring and monitoring	1
Perceptions on the role of research integrity officers in French medical schools	1
Write your paper on the motherland?	1
New collaborative statement by bioethics journal editors on generative AI use	1
Family without kinship – the pluralism of European regulatory research integrity systems and its implications	1
Are there accurate and legitimate ways to machine-quantify predatoriness, or an urgent need for an automated online tool?	1
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics	1
Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey	1
Do authors need an Ombudsperson to resolve peer-review issues?	1
Fairness and COVID: Conducting research during the crisis	1
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials	1
Beyond babies: Implications of human genome editing for women, children, and families	1

Let’s be fair. What about an AI editor?	1
Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023	1
Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative	1
Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?	1
Medical research without patents: It’s preferable, it’s profitable, and it’s practicable	1
The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings	1
Whistleblowing legislation and reporting on research misconduct: A case for mutual learning	1
Governance of research and product improvement studies in consumer mental health apps. Interviews with researchers and app developers	1
No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts	1
Postprints-to-preprints linkage to enhance access to scientific literature	1