Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Article	Citations
Mitigating global climate change and its environmental impact is a key social responsibility of scientists and should be part of research ethics policies and guidelines	121
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials	79
On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship	41
Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards	36
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study	29
Ethical committee frameworks and processes used to evaluate humanities research require reform: Findings from a UK-wide network consultation	27
OHSU Employees’ Opinions of Receipt of Clinical Care and Participation in Clinical Research at Place of Employment	27
Replication and trustworthiness	24
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers	23
The case for affiliation contribution statements	21
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality	21
Fake no more: The redemption of ChatGPT in literature reviews	18
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students	18
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study	17
Correction	17
Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study	17
Inverted U-Shaped relationship between team size and citation impact: Mediating role of responsibility diffusion	15
Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands	14
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics	13
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity	13
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals	12
A comprehensive ethics and data governance framework for data-intensive health research: Lessons from an Italian cancer research institute	12
Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine	12
Institutional policies on plagiarism management:A comparison of universities in mainland China and Hong Kong	11
Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods	11

Does YouTube promote research ethics and conduct? A content analysis of Youtube Videos and analysis of sentiments through viewers comments	10
Typology of conflict of commitment (COC) in the era of inappropriate foreign influence in research	10
Perceptions of network-level ethics in an engineering research center: Analysis of ethical issues & practices reported by scientific & engineering participants	10
Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe	10
For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group	10
A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences	10
How to write a good embedded ethics letter	9
A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction	9
The author expression ​of concern (AEOC): A proposed formal mechanism to allow authors’ legitimate concerns to be heard, and their rights and voices to be respected	9
How to embed ethics into laboratory research	9
In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline, a rejoinder to Curzer	9
Retraction (mal)practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the Dirk Smeesters’ research misconduct case	8
Transform DOI system into a science hub	8
Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context	8
Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures	8
A structural equation model for cyber academic dishonesty in higher education: Evidence from Taiwan	8
How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers	8
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates	7
COI works both ways: Investigation of misconduct by an independent research integrity organization is the way to go	7
The consistency of peer-reviewers and the process of commensuration: a comment on Bolek et al. (2022)	7
Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics	7
Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?	7
Fabrication in a study about honesty: A lost episode of columbo illustrating how forensic statistics is performed	7
Reviewer acknowledgment lists as data: Low-hanging fruit for analysis	6
Mapping nine decades of research integrity studies (1935–2024): A scientometric analysis	6
‘Special issue-ization’ as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the “big five” and the risks for research integrity	6
Incorporating replication in higher education: Supervisors’ perspectives and institutional pressures	6
Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study	6
‘I don’t believe in the neutrality of research. OK?’ Mapping researchers’ attitudes toward values in science	6
Reflections on the 2024 Final Rule on Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct	6
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders’ dishonest behavior?	6
Teaching research integrity as discussed in research integrity codes: A systematic literature review	6
Are the lists of questionable journals reasonable: A case study of early warning journal lists	6
Editorial	6
Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal	5
Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion	5
The research literature is an unsafe workplace	5
Using AI to write scholarly publications	5
Keeping the health of our home planet in mind as we do research	5
The case for compensating peer reviewers: A response to Moher and Vieira Armond	5
Timing and monitoring of financial disclosures in publications: A cross-institutional assessment of financial conflict of interest reports	5
AI, reviewer incentives, and questions raised by García et al.	5
Spin in randomized controlled trials of pharmacology in COVID-19: A systematic review	5
The use of text-matching software’s similarity scores	5
It takes two flints to start a fire: A focus group study into PhD supervision for responsible research	4
More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists’ perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase	4
“Dear Editor, may I speak with you?“	4
On “intent” in research misconduct	4
Time-based changes in authorship trend in research-intensive universities in Malaysia	4
Self-plagiarism: A retrospective study of its prevalence and patterns across scientific disciplines	4

What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses	4
Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates?	4
The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding	4
Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative	4
Limits of ethical non-human subjects research in an applied setting	4
Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges	4
The case for universal artificial intelligence declaration on the precedent of conflict of interest	4
Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study	4
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder	3
Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field	3
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends	3
Research data mismanagement – from questionable research practice to research misconduct	3
The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings	3
The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China	3
Responding to research misconduct allegations brought against top university officials	3
Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach	3
The justified limits of transparency in research misconduct reports	3
Maintaining ethics, Integrity, and accountability: Best practices for reporting a meta-analysis	3
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?	3
The trinity of good research: Distinguishing between research integrity, ethics, and governance	3
Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing	3
Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia	3
Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey	3
Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?	3
The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations	3
Harness editors’ networks of communication to fight publication fraud	3
The definition of research misconduct should be stated in the abstract when reporting research on research misconduct	2
A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia	2
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health	2
Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?	2
The common sense behind clinical trial names: An empirical study of trial acronyms	2
The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study	2
Are there accurate and legitimate ways to machine-quantify predatoriness, or an urgent need for an automated online tool?	2
Assessment criteria for research misconduct: Taiwanese researchers’ perceptions	2
Importance of considering historical contexts when selecting terminology for questionable journal list names	2
Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved	2
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of the Iranian medical faculty toward plagiarism	2
Peer review experiences of academic chemists in Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States	2
A practitioner-centered policy roadmap for ethical computational social science in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland	2
In Memoriam Dr. Sheldon Krimsky	2
How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code	2
Why do master’s students of humanities and social sciences publish papers in Chinese-language predatory journals? A qualitative study based on Grounded Theory	2
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university	2
Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education	2
De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of “bogus” publications at public sector universities in Pakistan	1
Correction	1
Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian universit	1
Peer reviewer fatigue, or peer reviewer refusal?	1
Polarization in research: What is it, why is it problematic, and how can it be addressed?	1
Open minds, tied hands: Awareness, behavior, and reasoning on open science and irresponsible research behavior	1
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding plagiarism of postgraduate students in Myanmar	1
AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors’ accuracy in behavioral health academic writing	1
Do authors need an Ombudsperson to resolve peer-review issues?	1
Points of departure and developing good practices for responsible internationalization in a rapidly changing world	1
Seniority, authorship order, and severity of punishment in research misconduct – shared/honorary authorships as explanations for an apparent paradox	1
Not so fast with fast funding	1
Write your paper on the motherland?	1
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values	1
The landscape of the characteristics, citations, scientific, technological, and altmetrics impacts of retracted papers in hematology	1
Developing faculty research mentors: Influence of experience with diverse mentees, gender, and mentorship training	1
Transferring rejected manuscripts to other journals: A good practice?	1
Training, networking, and support infrastructure for ombudspersons for good research practice: A survey of the status quo in the Berlin research area	1
On the (ab)use of special issues in scholarly journals	1
The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation	1
Status of animal experimentation in nutrition and dietetic research: Policies of 100 leading journals and new approach methodologies	1
No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts	1
Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study	1
Correction	1
A study on ethical review processes of local ethics committees for animal experimentation in Türkiye*	1
Training undergraduate students in HIPAA compliance	1
Not me-search, you-search: Ethical considerations for research involving marginalized outgroups	1
Truthfulness as the basis for ethical safeguards in deceptive research: An interview study with researchers	1
Evidence-based literature review, not the meta-analysis: A rejoinder	1
Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil	1
Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States	1
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?	1
Publishing important work that lacks validity or reproducibility – pushing frontiers or corrupting science?	1
Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center	1
The impact of affiliation naming proximity on the retrieval efficiency of Chinese universities-affiliated retractions in the Retraction Watch Database	1
How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?	1

Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers	1
Citation bias, diversity, and ethics	1
Self-retraction as redemption: Forgiveness for repentant authors	1
Appropriate inclusion of adult research participants with intellectual disability: an in-depth review of guidelines and policy statements	1
Perspectives on non-financial conflicts of interest in health-related journals: A scoping review	1
A tale of two formats: Graduate students’ perceptions and preferences of interactivity in Responsible conduct of research education	1
A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed	1
ChatGPT isn’t an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed	1
Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?	1
A proposal for a legally enforceable no-fault compensation framework for clinical trial-related injury in Malaysia	1
Safeguarding scientific integrity: A case study in examining manipulation in the peer review process	1
How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?	1